Ibn Gabirol and Judah ha-Levi's Usage of Dialogue: The Role of the Disciple in Fons Vitae and that of the King in Kitab al-Khazari

被引:1
作者
Ravitsky, Aviram [1 ]
机构
[1] Ariel Univ, Israel Heritage Dept, IL-40700 Ariel, Israel
关键词
Solomon Ibn Gabirol; Judah ha-Levi; dialogue; Neoplatonism; Kalam; Fons Vitae; Kuzari;
D O I
10.3390/rel10100549
中图分类号
B9 [宗教];
学科分类号
010107 ;
摘要
The literary framework of Solomon Ibn Gabirol's Fons Vitae is a conversation between a master and a disciple. In this article, the nature of the disciple's questions will be analyzed in order to explain the advantages of the dialogical process in Ibn Gabirol's thought. The literary framework of Judah ha-Levi's Kitab al-Khazari is similar to that of Fons Vitae. Ha-Levi's composition is built as a conversation that allegedly took place between the king of the Khazars and a Jewish scholar (haver). Analysis of the king's responses to the haver shows that the king did not fully understand the haver's lessons, in which the deep meaning of Judaism is taught. In this article, the king's responses will be analyzed and, likewise, the question of Judah ha-Levi's intention in using this literary sophistication. As is shown in this article both famous Andalusian poets and thinkers, R. Judah ha-Levi and R. Solomon Ibn Gabirol, masters of linguistic phrasing and style, used the dialogical form not only as an opportunity to present their world views, but also as a method by which to critique their own philosophies.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 59 条
  • [1] Abrahamov Binyamin, 2019, BOOK DIRECTION DUTIE, P5
  • [2] Altmann Alexander, 1958, TARBIZ, V27, P506
  • [3] Baeumker Clemens, 1895, FONS VITAE AVENCEBRO
  • [4] Baneth David H., 1977, KITAB AL RADD WA LDA
  • [5] MEDIEVAL DEBATES OF BODY AND SOUL
    BOSSY, MA
    [J]. COMPARATIVE LITERATURE, 1976, 28 (02) : 144 - 163
  • [6] Brody Robert, 1998, GEONIM BABYLONIA SHA, P185
  • [7] Daiber Hans., 1991, Encyclopaedia of Islam, V6, P636
  • [8] Davidson Herbert, 1972, REV ETUD JUIVES, V131, P381
  • [9] de Smet Daniel., 1998, Empedocles Arabus. Une lecture neoplatonicienne tardive
  • [10] Efros Israel, 1974, STUDIES MEDIEVAL JEW, P141