Hierarchy of governance institutions and the pecking order of privatisation: Central-Eastern Europe and Central Asia reconsidered

被引:11
作者
Mickiewicz, Tomasz M. [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Dept Social Sci, SSEES, London, England
关键词
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE; TRANSITION; PRIVATIZATION; LAW; CONSEQUENCES; CORRUPTION; CAPTURE; BALANCE; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1080/14631370903339823
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This article discusses property rights, corporate governance frameworks and privatisation outcomes in the Central-Eastern Europe and Central Asia (CEECA) region. We argue that while CEECA still suffers from deficient 'higher order' institutions, this is not attracting sufficient attention from international institutions like EBRD and the World Bank, which focus on 'lower order' indicators. We discuss factors that may alleviate the negative impact of the weakness in institutional environment and argue for the pecking order of privatisation, where equivalent privatisation is given a priority but speed is not compromised.
引用
收藏
页码:399 / 423
页数:25
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]   Unbundling institutions [J].
Acemoglu, D ;
Johnson, S .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2005, 113 (05) :949-995
[2]   Codes of good governance worldwide: What is the trigger? [J].
Aguilera, RV ;
Cuervo-Cazurra, A .
ORGANIZATION STUDIES, 2004, 25 (03) :415-443
[3]  
ALUCHNA M, 2006, CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, P194
[4]  
ANDREFF W, 2006, CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, P23
[5]  
[Anonymous], CORPORATE GOVT CENTR
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2007, CAPITALISM WAS BUILT
[7]   Privatisation in Poland: Ten years after [J].
Baltowski, M ;
Mickiewicz, T .
POST-COMMUNIST ECONOMIES, 2000, 12 (04) :425-443
[8]  
BALTOWSKI M, 2006, CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, P72
[9]  
Beach W., 2007, Methodology: Measuring the 10 Economic Freedom, 2007, Index of Economic Freedom
[10]   The balance of power in closely held corporations [J].
Bennedsen, M ;
Wolfenzon, D .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2000, 58 (1-2) :113-139