Applying spatially explicit capture-recapture models to estimate black bear density in South Carolina

被引:3
作者
Azad, Shefali [1 ]
McFadden, Katherine [2 ]
Clark, Joseph D. [3 ]
Wactor, Tammy [4 ]
Jachowski, David S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Clemson Univ, Dept Forestry & Environm Conservat, Clemson, SC 29634 USA
[2] Clemson Univ, South Carolina Cooperat Fish & Wildlife Res, US Geol Survey, Clemson, SC 29634 USA
[3] US Geol Survey, Northern Rocky Mt Sci Ctr, Southern Appalachian Field Branch, 274 Ellington Plant Sci Bldg, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
[4] Wildlife & Freshwater Fisheries, South Carolina Dept Nat Resources, Clemson, SC 29631 USA
来源
WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN | 2019年 / 43卷 / 03期
关键词
abundance; black bear; density; hair snare; South Carolina; spatially explicit capture-recapture; Ursus americanus; ESTIMATING POPULATION-SIZE; MARK-RECAPTURE; GRIZZLY BEARS; DNA; HAIR; HETEROGENEITY;
D O I
10.1002/wsb.1007
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Population density is an important component of wildlife management decisions, but can be difficult to estimate directly for an itinerant, wide-ranging species such as the American black bear (Ursus americanus). In South Carolina, USA, where there has been growth in black bear populations and bear-human-conflict reports during the past several decades, managers need robust estimates of population size to inform management strategies. We used maximum-likelihood capture-recapture models, using hair snares to collect DNA samples, to estimate density and abundance for a harvested population of black bear in northwestern South Carolina during 2013 to 2014. Models were tested in a spatially explicit framework using the secr package in Program R. Black bear density was estimated at 0.133 bears/km(2) (SE = 0.034) in 2013 and 0.179 bears/km(2) (SE = 0.043) in 2014. Black bear abundance in our study area was estimated to be 586 bears (SE = 95) in 2013 and 680 bears (SE = 128) in 2014, which are 2-3-fold lower than previous estimates. We suggest that these estimates be considered a baseline for state biologists to employ in the population's management and in developing future harvest-regulation strategies. Overall our study highlighted the potential for model choice to influence density estimates, and we concluded that spatially explicit models were appropriate for this study because geographic closure could not be assumed. (c) 2019 The Wildlife Society.
引用
收藏
页码:500 / 507
页数:8
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], THESIS
  • [2] [Anonymous], THESIS
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1982, PUBLICATIONS
  • [4] Demographic trends of a harvested American black bear population in northwestern South Carolina
    Azad, Shefali
    Wactor, Tammy
    Jachowski, David
    [J]. URSUS, 2017, 28 (01) : 56 - 65
  • [5] Relationship of Acorn Mast Production to Black Bear Population Growth Rates and Human-Bear Interactions in Northwestern South Carolina
    Azad, Shefali
    Wactor, Tammy
    Jachowski, David
    [J]. SOUTHEASTERN NATURALIST, 2017, 16 (02) : 235 - 251
  • [6] Spatially explicit maximum likelihood methods for capture-recapture studies
    Borchers, D. L.
    Efford, M. G.
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 2008, 64 (02) : 377 - 385
  • [7] Bowman JL, 2001, URSUS-SERIES, V12, P153
  • [8] BURNHAM K.P., 2002, MODEL SELECTION MULT, P352
  • [9] COWAN I M, 1972, IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources) Publications New Series, V23, P343
  • [10] Individual heterogeneity as a pitfall in population estimates based on non-invasive genetic sampling: a review and recommendations
    Ebert, Cornelia
    Knauer, Felix
    Storch, Ilse
    Hohmann, Ulf
    [J]. WILDLIFE BIOLOGY, 2010, 16 (03) : 225 - 240