Removal of arsenic and natural organic matter from groundwater using ferric and alum salts: A case study of central Banat region (Serbia)

被引:26
作者
Tubic, Aleksandra [1 ]
Agbaba, Jasmina [1 ]
Dalmacija, Bozo [1 ]
Ivancev-Tumbas, Ivana [1 ]
Dalmacija, Milena [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Novi Sad, Dept Chem, Fac Sci, Novi Sad 21000, Serbia
来源
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND HEALTH PART A-TOXIC/HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING | 2010年 / 45卷 / 03期
关键词
Arsenic; dissolved organic matter; ground water; ferrous chloride; polyaluminium chloride; aluminium sulphate; ENHANCED COAGULATION; DRINKING-WATER; IONS;
D O I
10.1080/10934520903467931
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper presents a comparison of the efficacy of three different coagulants (polyaluminium chloride (PACl), Aluminium sulphate (Al(2)(SO(4))(3)) and ferrous chloride (FeCl(3))) for natural organic matter and arsenic (As) removal from groundwater. Coagulation efficacy was evaluated for the coagulants alone and for combinations of them (PACl/FeCl(3); Al(2)(SO(4))(3)/FeCl(3)), on the basis of changes in dissolved organic matter (DOC) and arsenic content. For single coagulants, PACl (30 mg Al/L) showed optimal efficacy for DOC removal (57%, relative to raw water). The highest arsenic reduction (<5 mu g As/L in coagulated water) was achieved when a very high 300 mg/L dose of FeCl(3) was used. However, if PACl (30 mg Al/L) and FeCl(3) (10 mg FeCl(3)/L) are combined, the efficacy of DOC removal increases compared to PACl and FeCl(3) alone under similar doses (66% decrease in DOC relative to raw water). The DOC and As contents of the coagulated water after application of these doses were 2.26 mg C/L and 9.7 mu g/L, respectively, compared to 6.44 mg C/L and 60.5 mu g As/L measured in the raw groundwater. The combination of Al(2)(SO(4))(3) and FeCl(3) did not show any improvement in DOC and As removal efficacy relative to using those coagulants alone.
引用
收藏
页码:363 / 369
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
*AWWA APHA WEF, 1998, STAND METH EX WAT WA
[2]   Determination of arsenic removal efficiency by ferric ions using response surface methodology [J].
Baskan, Meltem Bilici ;
Pala, Aysegul .
JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2009, 166 (2-3) :796-801
[3]  
Carlson K, 2000, J AM WATER WORKS ASS, V92, P63
[4]  
Edzwald JK, 1994, P AWWA WQTC C SAN FR
[5]   Seasonal variations in the disinfection by-product precursor profile of a reservoir water [J].
Goslan, EH ;
Fearing, DA ;
Banks, J ;
Wilson, D ;
Hills, P ;
Campbell, AT ;
Parsons, SA .
JOURNAL OF WATER SUPPLY RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY-AQUA, 2002, 51 (08) :475-482
[6]   Arsenic removal during conventional aluminium-based drinking-water treatment [J].
Gregor, J .
WATER RESEARCH, 2001, 35 (07) :1659-1664
[7]  
IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer), 1987, IARC MON S7, V1-42, P100
[8]   Removing arsenic from groundwater for the developing world - a review [J].
Jiang, JQ .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2001, 44 (06) :89-98
[9]  
MILOSAVLJEVIC S, 1997, 100 YEARS HYDROGEOLO, V2, P117
[10]   Hydrogeological conditions and quality of ground waters in northern Banat, Pannonian basin [J].
Nikic, Zoran ;
Vidovic, Milka .
ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY, 2007, 52 (06) :1075-1084