Evaluation of GPROF V05 Precipitation Retrievals under Different Cloud Regimes

被引:5
|
作者
Tan, Jackson [1 ,2 ]
Cho, Nayeong [1 ,2 ]
Oreopoulos, Lazaros [2 ]
Kirstetter, Pierre [3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Baltimore, MD USA
[2] NASA Goddard Space Flight Ctr, Earth Sci Div, Greenbelt, MD USA
[3] Univ Oklahoma, Sch Meteorol, Norman, OK USA
[4] Univ Oklahoma, Sch Civil Engn & Environm Sci, Norman, OK USA
[5] NOAA, Severe Storms Lab, Norman, OK USA
关键词
Clouds; Precipitation; Rainfall; Climate classification; regimes; Cloud retrieval; Microwave observations; Radars; Radar observations; Remote sensing; Satellite observations; Clustering; SATELLITE; FRAMEWORK; SURFACE; ERROR; RADAR; LAND;
D O I
10.1175/JHM-D-21-0154.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Precipitation retrievals from passive microwave satellite observations form the basis of many widely used precipitation products, but the performance of the retrievals depends on numerous factors such as surface type and precipitation variability. Previous evaluation efforts have identified bias dependence on precipitation regime, which may reflect the influence on retrievals of recurring factors. In this study, the concept of a regime-based evaluation of precipitation from the Goddard profiling (GPROF) algorithm is extended to cloud regimes. Specifically, GPROF V05 precipitation retrievals under four different cloud regimes are evaluated against ground radars over the United States. GPROF is generally able to accurately retrieve the precipitation associated with both organized convection and less organized storms, which collectively produce a substantial fraction of global precipitation. However, precipitation from stratocumulus systems is underestimated over land and overestimated over water. Similarly, precipitation associated with trade cumulus environments is underestimated over land, while biases over water depend on the sensor's channel configuration. By extending the evaluation to more sensors and suppressed environments, these results complement insights previously obtained from precipitation regimes, thus demonstrating the potential of cloud regimes in categorizing the global atmosphere into discrete systems. Significance StatementTo understand how the accuracy of satellite precipitation depends on weather conditions, we compare the satellite estimates of precipitation against ground radars in the United States, using cloud regimes as a proxy for different recurring atmospheric systems. Consistent with previous studies, we found that errors in the satellite precipitation vary under different regimes. Satellite precipitation is, reassuringly, more accurate for storm systems that produce intense precipitation. However, in systems that produce weak or isolated precipitation, the errors are larger due to retrieval limitations. These findings highlight the important role of atmospheric states on the accuracy of satellite precipitation and the potential of cloud regimes for categorizing the global atmosphere.
引用
收藏
页码:389 / 402
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of V05 Precipitation Estimates from GPM Constellation Radiometers Using KuPR as the Reference
    You, Yalei
    Petkovic, Veljko
    Tan, Jackson
    Kroodsma, Rachael
    Berg, Wesley
    Kidd, Chris
    Peters-Lidard, Christa
    JOURNAL OF HYDROMETEOROLOGY, 2020, 21 (04) : 705 - 728
  • [2] Performance Evaluation of Version 5 (V05) of Integrated Multi-Satellite Retrievals for Global Precipitation Measurement (IMERG) over the Tianshan Mountains of China
    Yang, Min
    Li, Zhongqin
    Anjum, Muhammad Naveed
    Gao, Yayu
    WATER, 2019, 11 (06)
  • [3] Validation of GPM IMERG V05 and V06 Precipitation Products over Iran
    Hosseini-Moghari, Seyed-Mohammad
    Tang, Qiuhong
    JOURNAL OF HYDROMETEOROLOGY, 2020, 21 (05) : 1011 - 1037
  • [4] GPROF V7 and beyond: assessment of current and potential future versions of the GPROF passive microwave precipitation retrievals against ground radar measurements over the continental US and the Pacific Ocean
    Pfreundschuh, Simon
    Guilloteau, Clement
    Brown, Paula J.
    Kummerow, Christian D.
    Eriksson, Patrick
    ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES, 2024, 17 (02) : 515 - 538
  • [5] Evaluation of hydrological utility of IMERG Final run V05 and TMPA 3B42V7 satellite precipitation products in the Yellow River source region, China
    Yuan, Fei
    Wang, Bing
    Shi, Chunxiang
    Cui, Wei
    Zhao, Chongxu
    Liu, Yi
    Ren, Liliang
    Zhang, Limin
    Zhu, Yonghua
    Chen, Tao
    Jiang, Shanhu
    Yang, Xiaoli
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2018, 567 : 696 - 711
  • [6] Benefits of the Successive GPM Based Satellite Precipitation Estimates IMERG-V03,-V04,-V05 and GSMaP-V06,-V07 Over Diverse Geomorphic and Meteorological Regions of Pakistan
    Satge, Frederic
    Hussain, Yawar
    Bonnet, Marie-Paule
    Hussain, Babar M.
    Martinez-Carvajal, Hernan
    Akhter, Gulraiz
    Uagoda, Rogerio
    REMOTE SENSING, 2018, 10 (09)
  • [7] Soil nitrogen dynamics in northeastern Patagonia steppe under different precipitation regimes
    M.J. Mazzarino
    M.B. Bertiller
    C. Sain
    P. Satti
    F. Coronato
    Plant and Soil, 1998, 202 : 125 - 131
  • [8] A Simple Scaling Analysis of Rainfall in Andalusia (Spain) under Different Precipitation Regimes
    Casas-Castillo, Maria del Carmen
    Rodriguez-Sola, Raul
    Llabres-Brustenga, Alba
    Garcia-Marin, Amanda Penelope
    Estevez, Javier
    Navarro, Xavier
    WATER, 2022, 14 (08)
  • [9] Exploration of aerosol-precipitation relationships under different climate regimes in China
    Xiao, Yuanyuan
    Zhang, Jun
    Zhu, Jingxuan
    Dai, Qiang
    GISCIENCE & REMOTE SENSING, 2025, 62 (01)
  • [10] Soil nitrogen dynamics in northeastern Patagonia steppe under different precipitation regimes
    Mazzarino, MJ
    Bertiller, MB
    Sain, C
    Satti, P
    Coronato, F
    PLANT AND SOIL, 1998, 202 (01) : 125 - 131