Trait aggression is associated with five-factor personality traits in males

被引:15
作者
Dam, Vibeke H. [1 ,2 ]
Hjordt, Liv Vadskjaer [1 ]
da Cunha-Bang, Sofi [1 ]
Sestoft, Dorte [3 ]
Knudsen, Gitte Moos [1 ]
Stenbaek, Dea Siggaard [1 ]
机构
[1] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Rigshosp, Neurosci Ctr, Neurobiol Res Unit, Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Fac Hlth & Med Sci, Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Minist Justice, Clin Forens Psychiat, Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
aggression; Buss– Perry Aggression Questionnaire; five‐ factor personality; violent offenders; ANTISOCIAL-BEHAVIOR; PSYCHOPATHY; DISORDERS; AGREEABLENESS; INVENTORIES; VIOLENCE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1002/brb3.2175
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Background Although aggression is conceptualized as a dimensional construct with violent behavior representing the extreme end of a spectrum, studies on the involvement of personality traits in human aggression have typically only included data representing a restricted spectrum of aggressive behaviors. Methods In the current study, we therefore examine whether trait aggression is associated with five-factor model personality traits in an enriched sample of 259 men with a broad continuum of trait aggression, ranging from very low to very high including 39 incarcerated aggressive violent offenders. All participants completed the NEO Personality Inventory-Revised (NEO PI-R) and the Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire (BPAQ). The association between each of the five NEO PI-R personality traits and trait aggression (BPAQ) was investigated using five linear regression models, covarying for group status, age and educational level. Results Higher BPAQ scores were positively associated with Neuroticism and negatively associated with Agreeableness and Conscientiousness. Conclusion Our results indicate that those high in Neuroticism and low in Agreeableness and Conscientiousness are at higher risk of exhibiting aggressive behavior, underlining the relevance of these higher order personality traits in understanding aggressive behavior. We argue that studying individual personality differences should be offered a greater attention within violent and criminal behaviors.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, PERSONALITY ADULTHOO
[2]   Direct and indirect relations between the Big 5 personality traits and aggressive and violent behavior [J].
Barlett, Christopher P. ;
Anderson, Craig A. .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2012, 52 (08) :870-875
[3]   Psychology as the Science of Self-Reports and Finger Movements Whatever Happened to Actual Behavior? [J].
Baumeister, Roy F. ;
Vohs, Kathleen D. ;
Funder, David C. .
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2007, 2 (04) :396-403
[4]   Personality and aggressive behavior under provoking and neutral conditions: A meta-analytic review [J].
Bettencourt, B. Ann ;
Talley, Amelia ;
Benjamin, Arlin James ;
Valentine, Jeffrey .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2006, 132 (05) :751-777
[5]   A META-ANALYSIS EXPLORING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PSYCHOPATHY AND INSTRUMENTAL VERSUS REACTIVE VIOLENCE [J].
Blais, Julie ;
Solodukhin, Elizabeth ;
Forth, Adelle E. .
CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND BEHAVIOR, 2014, 41 (07) :797-821
[6]  
Brazil K J., 2016, Encyclopedia of personality and individual differences, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_1079-1, 10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_1079-1]
[7]   THE AGGRESSION QUESTIONNAIRE [J].
BUSS, AH ;
PERRY, M .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 63 (03) :452-459
[8]   Trait aggression and trait impulsivity are not related to frontal cortex 5-HT2A receptor binding in healthy individuals [J].
da Cunha-Bang, Sophie ;
Stenbaek, Dea Siggaard ;
Holst, Klaus ;
Licht, Cecilie Loe ;
Jensen, Peter Steen ;
Frokjaer, Vibe Gedso ;
Mortensen, Erik Lykke ;
Knudsen, Gitte Moos .
PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH-NEUROIMAGING, 2013, 212 (02) :125-131
[9]  
Domino G., 2006, PSYCHOL TESTING
[10]   Agreeableness, empathy, and helping: A person X situation perspective [J].
Graziano, William G. ;
Habashi, Meara M. ;
Sheese, Brad E. ;
Tobin, Renee A. .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 93 (04) :583-599