Deep Learning for Patient-Specific Quality Assurance: Predicting Gamma Passing Rates for IMRT Based on Delivery Fluence Informed by log Files

被引:14
作者
Huang, Ying [1 ]
Pi, Yifei [2 ]
Ma, Kui [3 ]
Miao, Xiaojuan [4 ]
Fu, Sichao [4 ]
Zhu, Zhen [1 ]
Cheng, Yifan [1 ]
Zhang, Zhepei [1 ]
Chen, Hua [1 ]
Wang, Hao [1 ]
Gu, Hengle [1 ]
Shao, Yan [1 ]
Duan, Yanhua [1 ]
Feng, Aihui [1 ]
Zhuo, Weihai [5 ]
Xu, Zhiyong [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Shanghai Chest Hosp, Shanghai 200030, Peoples R China
[2] Zhengzhou Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Radiat Oncol, Zhengzhou, Henan, Peoples R China
[3] Varian Med Syst, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Gen Hosp Western Theater Command PLA, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[5] Fudan Univ, Key Lab Nucl Phys & Ion Beam Applicat MOE, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China
关键词
convolutional neural network; deep learning; log files; quality assurance; QA; COMPLEXITY; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.1177/15330338221104881
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives: In this study, we propose a deep learning-based approach to predict Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) quality assurance (QA) gamma passing rates using delivery fluence informed by log files. Methods: A total of 112 IMRT plans for chest cancers were planned and measured by portal dosimetry equipped on TrueBeam linac. The convolutional neural network (CNN) based learning model was trained using delivery fluence as inputs and gamma passing rates (GPRs) of 4 different criteria (3%/3 mm, 2%/3 mm, 3%/2 mm, and 2%/2 mm) as outputs. Model performance for both validation and test sets was assessed using mean absolute error (MAE), mean squared error (MSE), root MSE (RMSE), Spearman rank correlation coefficients (Sr), and Determination coefficient (R-2) between the measured and predicted GPR values. Results: In the test set, the MAE of the prediction model were 0.402, 0.511, 1.724, and 2.530, the MSE were 0.640, 0.986, 6.654, and 9.508, the RMSE were 0.800, 0.993, 2.580, and 3.083, the Sr were 0.643, 0.684, 0.821, and 0.824 (P < .001) and the R-2 were 0.4110, 0.4666, 0.6677, and 0.6769 for 3%/3 mm, 3%/2 mm, 2%/3 mm, and 2%/2 mm, respectively. The MAE and RMSE of the prediction model decreased with stricter gamma criteria while the Sr and R-2 between measured and predicted GPR values increased. Conclusions: The CNN prediction model based on delivery fluence informed by log files could accurately predict IMRT QA passing rates for different gamma criteria. It could reduce QA workload and improve efficiency in pretreatment QA. Our results suggest that the CNN prediction model based on delivery fluence informed by log files may be a promising tool for the gamma evaluation of IMRT QA.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2016, ICLR
[2]   Experimental validation of a commercial 3D dose verification system for intensity-modulated arc therapies [J].
Boggula, Ramesh ;
Lorenz, Friedlieb ;
Mueller, Lutz ;
Birkner, Mattias ;
Wertz, Hansjoerg ;
Stieler, Florian ;
Steil, Volker ;
Lohr, Frank ;
Wenz, Frederik .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2010, 55 (19) :5619-5633
[3]   A machine learning approach to the accurate prediction of multi-leaf collimator positional errors [J].
Carlson, Joel N. K. ;
Park, Jong Min ;
Park, So-Yeon ;
Park, Jong In ;
Choi, Yunseok ;
Ye, Sung-Joon .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2016, 61 (06) :2514-2531
[4]   Comparison of four commercial devices for RapidArc and sliding window IMRT QA [J].
Chandraraj, Varatharaj ;
Stathakis, Sotirios ;
Manickam, Ravikumar ;
Esquivel, Carlos ;
Supe, Sanjay S. ;
Papanikolaou, Nikos .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 12 (02) :338-349
[5]   Technical Note: Relationships between gamma criteria and action levels: Results of a multicenter audit of gamma agreement index results [J].
Crowe, Scott B. ;
Sutherland, Bess ;
Wilks, Rachael ;
Seshadri, Venkatakrishnan ;
Sylvander, Steven ;
Trapp, Jamie V. ;
Kairn, Tanya .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (03) :1501-1506
[6]   IMRT commissioning: Multiple institution planning and dosimetry comparisons, a report from AAPM Task Group 119 [J].
Ezzell, Gary A. ;
Burmeister, Jay W. ;
Dogan, Nesrin ;
LoSasso, Thomas J. ;
Mechalakos, James G. ;
Mihailidis, Dimitris ;
Molineu, Andrea ;
Palta, Jatinder R. ;
Ramsey, Chester R. ;
Salter, Bill J. ;
Shi, Jie ;
Xia, Ping ;
Yue, Ning J. ;
Xiao, Ying .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 36 (11) :5359-5373
[7]   Predicting VMAT patient-specific QA results using a support vector classifier trained on treatment plan characteristics and linac QC metrics [J].
Granville, Dal A. ;
Sutherland, Justin G. ;
Belec, Jason G. ;
La Russa, Daniel J. .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2019, 64 (09)
[8]   Cross verification of independent dose recalculation, log files based, and phantom measurement-based pretreatment quality assurance for volumetric modulated arc therapy [J].
Han, Ce ;
Yi, Jinling ;
Zhu, Kecheng ;
Zhou, Yongqiang ;
Ai, Yao ;
Zheng, Xiaomin ;
Xie, Congying ;
Jin, Xiance .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 21 (11) :98-104
[9]   Improvement of prediction and classification performance for gamma passing rate by using plan complexity and dosiomics features [J].
Hirashima, Hideaki ;
Ono, Tomohiro ;
Nakamura, Mitsuhiro ;
Miyabe, Yuki ;
Mukumoto, Nobutaka ;
Iramina, Hiraku ;
Mizowaki, Takashi .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2020, 153 :250-257
[10]   Quality assurance of geometric accuracy based on an electronic portal imaging device and log data analysis for Dynamic WaveArc irradiation [J].
Hirashima, Hideaki ;
Miyabe, Yuki ;
Nakamura, Mitsuhiro ;
Mukumoto, Nobutaka ;
Mizowaki, Takashi ;
Hiraoka, Masahiro .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 19 (03) :234-242