共 33 条
Heparin Anti-Xa Activity, a Readily Available Unique Test to Quantify Apixaban, Rivaroxaban, Fondaparinux, and Danaparoid Levels
被引:20
作者:
Boissier, Elodie
[1
]
Senage, Thomas
[2
,3
]
Babuty, Antoine
[1
,4
]
Gouin-Thibault, Isabelle
[5
]
Rozec, Bertrand
[6
,7
]
Roussel, Jean-Christian
[2
]
Sigaud, Marianne
[1
,4
]
Ternisien, Catherine
[1
,4
]
Trossaert, Marc
[1
,4
]
Fouassier, Marc
[1
,4
]
Lakhal, Karim
[6
]
机构:
[1] CHU Nantes, Lab Hematol, Nantes, France
[2] CHU Nantes, Serv Chirurg Thorac & Cardiovasc, Nantes, France
[3] Univ Nantes, Ctr Natl Rech Sci CNRS, Inst Natl Sante & Rech Med INSERM 1246, Study Perinatal Paediat & Adolescent Hlth Epidemi, Nantes, France
[4] CHU Nantes, Ctr Traitement Hemophilie, Nantes, France
[5] CHU Rennes, Lab Hematol, Rennes, France
[6] CHU Nantes, Hop Laennec, Serv Anesthesie Reanimat, Nantes, France
[7] Univ Nantes, INSERM, Ctr Natl Rech Sci CNRS, Inst Thorax, Nantes, France
关键词:
DIRECT ORAL ANTICOAGULANTS;
MOLECULAR-WEIGHT HEPARIN;
GUIDANCE;
PLASMA;
ASSAYS;
MANAGEMENT;
SSC;
D O I:
10.1213/ANE.0000000000005114
中图分类号:
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号:
100217 ;
摘要:
BACKGROUND: Despite their usefulness in perioperative and acute care settings, factor-Xa inhibitor-specific assays are scarcely available, contrary to heparin anti-Xa assay. We assessed whether the heparin anti-Xa assay can (1) be used as a screening test to rule out apixaban, rivaroxaban, fondaparinux, and danaparoid levels that contraindicate invasive procedures according to current guidelines (>30 ng center dot mL(-1), >30 ng center dot mL(-1), >0.1 mu g center dot mL(-1), and >0.1 IU center dot mL(-1), respectively), (2) quantify the anticoagulant level if found significant, that is, if it exceeded the abovementioned threshold. METHODS: In the derivation cohort then in the validation cohort, via receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis, we evaluated the ability of heparin anti-Xa assay to detect levels of factor-Xa inhibitors above or below the abovementioned safety thresholds recommended for an invasive procedure (screening test). Among samples with relevant levels of factor-Xa inhibitor, we determined the conversion factor linking the measured level and heparin anti-Xa activity in a derivation cohort. In a validation cohort, the estimated level of each factor-Xa inhibitor was thus inferred from heparin anti-Xa activity. The agreement between measured and estimated levels of factor-Xa inhibitors was assessed. RESULTS: Among 989 (355 patients) and 756 blood samples (420 patients) in the derivation and validation cohort, there was a strong linear relationship between heparin anti-Xa activities and factor-Xa inhibitors measured level (r = 0.99 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.99-0.99]). In the derivation cohort, heparin anti-Xa activity <= 0.2, <= 0.3, <0.1, <0.1 IU center dot mL(-1) reliably ruled out a relevant level of apixaban, rivaroxaban, fondaparinux, and danaparoid, respectively (area under the ROC curve >= 0.99). In the validation cohort, these cutoffs yielded excellent classification accuracy (>= 96%). If this screening test indicated relevant level of factor-Xa inhibitor, estimated and measured levels closely agreed (Lin's correlation coefficient close to its maximal value: 95% CI, 0.99-0.99). More than 96% of the estimated levels fell into the predefined range of acceptability (ie, 80%-120% of the measured level). CONCLUSIONS: A unique simple test already widely used to assay heparin was also useful for quantifying these 4 other anticoagulants. Both clinical and economic impacts of these findings should be assessed in a specific study.
引用
收藏
页码:707 / 716
页数:10
相关论文