An ex ante assessment of value conflicts and social acceptance of sustainable heating systems An agent-based modelling approach

被引:17
作者
de Wildt, Tristan E. [1 ]
Boijmans, Anne R. [1 ]
Chappin, Emile J. L. [1 ]
Herder, Paulien M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Technol Policy & Management, Jaffalaan 5, NL-2628 BX Delft, Netherlands
关键词
Sustainable heating; Social acceptance; Value conflicts; Value change; Agent-based modelling; Scenario discovery; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; PUBLIC VALUES; PUMP SYSTEMS; INTEGRATION; RENEWABLES; INNOVATION; DYNAMICS; ADOPTION; JUSTICE;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112265
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper demonstrates an approach to assess, ex ante, the social acceptance of sustainable heating systems in city districts. More sustainable heating systems are required in city districts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. However, these systems may lack social acceptance as they often require significant adjustments to homes and may lead to a noticeable loss of in-home thermal comfort. Predicting social acceptance is often difficult due to the long-term planning horizon for energy systems. It is therefore unclear which design requirements and policy guidelines need to be specified ex ante. We suggest an approach to anticipate social acceptance by identifying value conflicts embedded in sustainable heating systems in specific social settings. These value conflicts might cause a lack of social acceptance over time due to value change. We demonstrate this approach using a case of community-driven heating initiative in The Hague, the Netherlands. We identify value conflicts embedded in various sustainable heating systems using an agent-based model. We formulate scenarios of value change to understand the severity of resulting social acceptance issues and discuss suitable heating systems for the city district. The approach can be used to support the decision-making process of policymakers at the local level, even in situations of limited local expertise.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 88 条
  • [1] ACM, 2017, EN 2017
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2014, FUTURE ENERGY
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2017, SOCIALISEREN NETKOST
  • [4] Merging validation and evaluation of ecological models to 'evaludation': A review of terminology and a practical approach
    Augusiak, Jacqueline
    Van den Brink, Paul J.
    Grimm, Volker
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2014, 280 : 117 - 128
  • [5] Energy efficiency and household behavior: the rebound effect in the residential sector
    Aydin, Erdal
    Kok, Nils
    Brounen, Dirk
    [J]. RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2017, 48 (03) : 749 - 782
  • [6] EXPLORATORY MODELING FOR POLICY ANALYSIS
    BANKES, S
    [J]. OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1993, 41 (03) : 435 - 449
  • [7] Making computational social science effective - Epistemology, methodology, and technology
    Bankes, S
    Lempert, R
    Popper, S
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE COMPUTER REVIEW, 2002, 20 (04) : 377 - 388
  • [8] Social acceptance of low carbon energy and associated infrastructures: A critical discussion
    Batel, Susana
    Devine-Wright, Patrick
    Tangeland, Torvald
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 58 : 1 - 5
  • [9] Agent-based modeling: Methods and techniques for simulating human systems
    Bonabeau, E
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2002, 99 : 7280 - 7287
  • [10] Model Parameter Estimation and Uncertainty: A Report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force-6
    Briggs, Andrew H.
    Weinstein, Milton C.
    Fenwick, Elisabeth A. L.
    Karnon, Jonathan
    Sculpher, Mark J.
    Paltiel, A. David
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2012, 15 (06) : 835 - 842