Resilience theory incorporated into urban wastewater systems management. State of the art

被引:103
作者
Juan-Garcia, P. [1 ,2 ]
Butler, D. [3 ]
Comas, J. [2 ,4 ]
Darch, G. [1 ]
Sweetapple, C. [3 ]
Thornton, A. [1 ]
Corominas, Ll [2 ]
机构
[1] Atkins, Hub 500 Pk Ave, Bristol BS32 4RZ, Avon, England
[2] Univ Girona, Catalan Inst Water Res ICRA, Sci & Technol Pk,Carrer Emili Grahit 101, E-17003 Girona, Spain
[3] Univ Exeter, Coll Engn Math & Phys Sci, Ctr Water Syst, Exeter, Devon, England
[4] Univ Girona, Inst Environm, LEQUIA, Campus Montilivi,Carrer Maria Aurelia Capmany 69, E-17003 Girona, Catalonia, Spain
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Management; Resilience; Sewer systems; Wastewater; WRRF; CLIMATE-CHANGE; INFRASTRUCTURE; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.watres.2017.02.047
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Government bodies, utilities, practitioners, and researchers have growing interest in the incorporation of resilience into wastewater management. Since resilience is a multidisciplinary term, it is important to review what has been achieved in the wastewater sector, and describe the future research directions for the forthcoming years. This work presents a critical review of studies that deal with resilience in the wastewater treatment sector, with a special focus on understanding how they addressed the key elements for assessing resilience, such as stressors, system properties, metrics and interventions to increase resilience. The results showed that only 17 peer-reviewed papers and 6 relevant reports, a small subset of the work in wastewater research, directly addressed resilience. The lack of consensus in the definition of resilience, and the elements of a resilience assessment, is hindering the implementation of resilience in wastewater management. To date, no framework for resilience assessment is complete, comprehensive or directly applicable to practitioners; current examples are lacking key elements (e.g. a comprehensive study of stressors, properties and metrics, examples of cases study, ability to benchmark interventions or connectivity with broader frameworks). Furthermore, resilience is seen as an additional cost or extra effort, instead of a means to overcome project uncertainty that could unlock new opportunities for investment. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 161
页数:13
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2015, P WATER ENV FED, DOI DOI 10.2175/193864715819555715
  • [2] [Anonymous], RES TASK FIN GROUP 1
  • [3] A New Approach to Urban Water Management: Safe and Sure
    Butler, D.
    Farmani, R.
    Fu, G.
    Ward, S.
    Diao, K.
    Astaraie-Imani, M.
    [J]. 16TH WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM ANALYSIS CONFERENCE (WDSA2014): URBAN WATER HYDROINFORMATICS AND STRATEGIC PLANNING, 2014, 89 : 347 - 354
  • [4] Butler D., 2016, GLOB CHALLENGES
  • [5] Campos L. C., 2015, INFRASTRUCTURE CLIMA, V5
  • [6] Adaptation of UK wastewater infrastructure to climate change
    Campos, Luiza Cintra
    Darch, Geoff
    [J]. INFRASTRUCTURE ASSET MANAGEMENT, 2015, 2 (03)
  • [7] Conroy P., 2013, 13RG063
  • [8] Conroy P., 2013, RESILIENCE PLANNING
  • [9] Definition of realistic disturbances as a crucial step during the assessment of resilience of natural wastewater treatment systems
    Cuppens, A.
    Smets, I.
    Wyseure, G.
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 65 (08) : 1506 - 1513
  • [10] Transforming 'value engineering' froman art form into a science - process resilience modelling
    Currie, J.
    Wragg, N.
    Roberts, C.
    Tattersall, J.
    Leslie, G.
    [J]. WATER PRACTICE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 9 (01): : 104 - 114