The mutual constraints of states and global value chains during COVID-19: The case of personal protective equipment

被引:27
作者
Dallas, Mark P. [1 ]
Horner, Rory [2 ,3 ]
Li, Lantian [4 ]
机构
[1] Union Coll, Dept Polit Sci & Asian Studies, Schenectady, NY 12308 USA
[2] Univ Manchester, Global Dev Inst, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
[3] Univ Johannesburg, Dept Geog Environm Management & Energy Studies, Auckland Pk, Johannesburg, South Africa
[4] Northwestern Univ, Dept Sociol, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
关键词
Global value chains (GVC); States; COVID-19; Personal protective equipment (PPE); China; Europe; United States; PRODUCTION NETWORKS; GOVERNANCE; TRADE; FIRMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105324
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Shortages of critical medical supplies during the COVID-19 pandemic have turned global value chains (GVCs) in personal protective equipment (PPE) into a political lightning rod. Some blame excessive outsourcing and foreign dependency for causing shortages, thus urging greater state intervention; others applaud GVCs for their flexibility and scaling up of production, while blaming states for undermining GVC operations. Using policy process-tracing and monthly trade data of seven PPE products across the US, Europe, China and Malaysia, this paper goes beyond the binary debate of either the 'failure' or 'success' of GVCs to show when and under what conditions states interacted with GVCs to produce mixed outcomes in provisioning countries with PPEs. We identify interactions between the type of state intervention and two key structural features of GVCs -geographic distribution of production and technological attributes of the product. Conceptually, the paper demonstrates the mutual constraints of states and GVCs, and highlights structural factors involved in the relationship. Looking to the future of GVCs, we caution against wholesale declarations that GVCs should be abandoned or maintained, instead concluding that paying attention to GVC structure, states and their interactions are crucial. (c) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]   The political economy of state governance in global production networks: change, crisis and contestation in the South African fruit sector [J].
Alford, Matthew ;
Phillips, Nicola .
REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2018, 25 (01) :98-121
[2]  
Anner Mark, 2020, 2020 2020 IEEE IEEE
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2020, COVID-19 Trade Watch
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2020, OECD Policy Responses to Coronavirus (COVID-19), DOI DOI 10.1787/04934EF4-EN
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2019, GENDER WORK GLOBAL V
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2020, Joe Biden for President: Official Campaign Website
[7]  
Arumugam T., 2020, NEW STRAITS TIMES
[8]  
Asian Development Bank, 2020, GLOB SHORT PERSN PRO
[9]   Global Capitalism and Commodity Chains: Looking Back, Going Forward [J].
Bair, Jennifer .
COMPETITION & CHANGE, 2005, 9 (02) :153-180
[10]  
Baldwin R., 2020, COVID 19 TRADE POLIC