Pressure Improvement on a Supercritical High-Lift Wing Using Simple and Modulated Pulse Jet Vortex Generator

被引:28
作者
Abdolahipour, Soheila [1 ]
Mani, Mahmoud [2 ]
Shams Taleghani, Arash [1 ]
机构
[1] Minist Sci Res & Technol, Aerosp Res Inst, Mahestan St,POB 14665-834, Tehran, Iran
[2] Amirkabir Univ Technol, Dept Aerosp Engn, 350 Hafez Ave,Valiasr Sq, Tehran 1591634311, Iran
关键词
High-lift configuration; Unsteady blowing; Pulsed jet vortex generator; Burst modulation; Pressure coefficient; Total pressure loss; DECELERATING BOUNDARY-LAYER; ACTIVE SEPARATION CONTROL; AERODYNAMIC FLOW-CONTROL; LEADING-EDGE; PART; AIRFOIL; REATTACHMENT; OPTIMIZATION; FREQUENCY; ACTUATION;
D O I
10.1007/s10494-022-00327-9
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
In this paper, an experimental study, aimed at delaying flow separation on a high-lift device using a pulsed blowing excitation method, is reported. The main objective of this investigation was to evaluate a new pulsed jet generation strategy to enhance flow control performance. In these experiments, two types of signal waveform were implemented to produce the unsteady blowing; a simple square-wave excitation signal for the first case, and a burst modulated excitation signal for the second case. The signal modulation was the first time to be used for a fast-switching solenoid valve actuator. Another objective of this study was to evaluate a new arrangement of the jet exit slots, in the form of a vortex generator which was employed for the first time on the high-lift device. For this purpose, a NASA SC(2)-0714 airfoil with a single slotted flap was employed. The vortex generator jets emanated from the shoulder of the trailing-edge flap with excitation frequencies from 40 to 1000 Hz. Pressure distribution around the model and wake total pressure deficit were measured. The results indicated that ejection from vortex generator slot pairs was able to prevent flow separation completely in most conditions. These measurements revealed that the burst modulated excitation signal was accompanied by more aerodynamic improvements and less air consumption relative to the simple pulsed jet excitation signal. In the best flow control mode, the results showed about a 53% increase in the value of the suction pressure peak on the flap and a 38% decrease in drag with a reduction in total pressure loss.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 100
页数:36
相关论文
共 62 条
[31]   Control of a decelerating boundary layer. Part 2: Optimization of slotted jets vortex generators [J].
Godard, G. ;
Foucaut, J. M. ;
Stanislas, M. .
AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 10 (05) :394-400
[32]   Control of a decelerating boundary layer. Part 1: Optimization of passive vortex generators [J].
Godard, G ;
Stanislas, M .
AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 10 (03) :181-191
[33]   The control of flow separation by periodic excitation [J].
Greenblatt, D ;
Wygnanski, IJ .
PROGRESS IN AEROSPACE SCIENCES, 2000, 36 (07) :487-545
[34]   Combined Active Separation Control on the Leading Edge and on the Trailing Edge Flap of a Slatless High-Lift Configuration [J].
Haucke, Frank ;
Bauer, Matthias ;
Nitsche, Wolfgang .
NEW RESULTS IN NUMERICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL FLUID MECHANICS X, 2016, 132 :215-225
[35]   Penetration and mixing of fully modulated turbulent jets in crossflow [J].
Johari, H ;
Pacheco-Tougas, M ;
Hermanson, JC .
AIAA JOURNAL, 1999, 37 (07) :842-850
[36]   Scaling of fully pulsed jets in crossflow [J].
Johari, Hamid .
AIAA JOURNAL, 2006, 44 (11) :2719-2725
[37]  
Kolzsch A., 2017, THESIS TU MUNCHEN
[38]   Active Control of Bluff-Body Flows Using Plasma Actuators [J].
Konstantinidis, Efstathios .
ACTUATORS, 2019, 8 (03)
[39]   The effects of pulse frequency and duty cycle on the skin friction downstream of pulsed jet vortex generators in an adverse pressure gradient turbulent boundary layer [J].
Kostas, J. ;
Foucaut, J. M. ;
Stanislas, M. .
AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 13 (01) :36-48
[40]   Stability analysis of separated flows subject to control by zero-net-mass-flux jet [J].
Marxen, Olaf ;
Kotapati, Rupesh B. ;
Mittal, Rajat ;
Zaki, Tamer .
PHYSICS OF FLUIDS, 2015, 27 (02)