A comparative study of warping and rigid body registration for the prostate and pelvic MR volumes

被引:62
作者
Fei, BW
Kemper, C
Wilson, DL
机构
[1] Case Western Reserve Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[2] Univ Hosp Cleveland, Dept Radiol, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
关键词
image registration; mutual information; thin plate spline; prostate cancer therapy; interventional magnetic resonance imaging;
D O I
10.1016/S0895-6111(02)00093-9
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
A three-dimensional warping registration algorithm was created and compared to rigid body registration of magnetic resonance (MR) pelvic volumes including the prostate. The rigid body registration method combines the advantages of mutual information (MI) and correlation coefficient at different resolutions. Warping registration is based upon independent optimization of many interactively placed control points (CP's) using MI and a thin plate spline transformation. More than 100 registration experiments with 17 MR volume pairs determined the quality of registration under conditions simulating potential interventional MRI-guided treatments of prostate cancer. For image pairs that stress rigid body registration (e.g. supine, the diagnostic position, and legs raised, the treatment position), both visual and numerical evaluation methods showed that warping consistently worked better than rigid body. Experiments showed that approximate to 180 strategically placed CP's were sufficiently expressive to capture important features of the deformation. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:267 / 281
页数:15
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Prostate target volume variations during a course of radiotherapy
    Antolak, JA
    Rosen, II
    Childress, CH
    Zagars, GK
    Pollack, A
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1998, 42 (03): : 661 - 672
  • [2] MEASUREMENT OF PROSTATE MOVEMENT OVER THE COURSE OF ROUTINE RADIOTHERAPY USING IMPLANTED MARKERS
    BALTER, JM
    SANDLER, HM
    LAM, K
    BREE, RL
    LICHTER, AS
    TENHAKEN, RK
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1995, 31 (01): : 113 - 118
  • [3] Bharatha A, 2001, RADIOLOGY, V221, P224
  • [4] OPTIMIZATION OF PROSTATE CARCINOMA STAGING - COMPARISON OF IMAGING AND CLINICAL METHODS
    BONI, RAH
    BONER, JA
    DEBATIN, JF
    TRINKLER, F
    KNONAGEL, H
    VONHOCHSTETTER, A
    HELFENSTEIN, U
    KRESTIN, GP
    [J]. CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 1995, 50 (09) : 593 - 600
  • [5] BOOKSTEIN FL, 1991, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V511, P326, DOI 10.1007/BFb0033763
  • [6] Carr T, 2000, AUSTRALAS J AGEING, V19, P3
  • [7] A physics-based coordinate transformation for 3-D image matching
    Davis, MH
    Khotanzad, A
    Flamig, DP
    Harms, SE
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 1997, 16 (03) : 317 - 328
  • [8] Comparison and evaluation of rigid, affine, and nonrigid registration of breast MR images
    Denton, ERE
    Sonoda, LI
    Rueckert, D
    Rankin, SC
    Hayes, C
    Leach, MO
    Hill, DLG
    Hawkes, DJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1999, 23 (05) : 800 - 805
  • [9] Feasibility and acute toxicities of radioimmunoguided prostate brachytherapy
    Ellis, RJ
    Sodee, DB
    Spirnak, JP
    Dinchman, KH
    O'Leary, AW
    Samuels, MA
    Resnick, MI
    Kinsella, TJ
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2000, 48 (03): : 683 - 687
  • [10] Robust registration method for interventional MRI-guided thermal ablation of prostate cancer
    Fei, BW
    Wheaton, A
    Lee, Z
    Nagano, K
    Duerk, JL
    Wilson, DL
    [J]. MEDICAL IMAGING 2001: VISUALIZATION, DISPLAY, AND IMAGE-GUIDED PROCEDURES, 2001, 4319 : 53 - 60