Validation and implementation of the Panbio COVID-19 Ag rapid test for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection in symptomatic hospital healthcare workers

被引:10
|
作者
Kolwijck, E. [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Brouwers-Boers, M. [1 ]
Broertjes, J. [1 ,3 ]
van Heeswijk, K. [1 ]
Runderkamp, N. [1 ]
Meijer, A. [4 ]
Hermans, M. H. A. [1 ]
Leenders, A. C. A. P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Jeroen Bosch Hosp, Dept Med Microbiol, sHertogenbosch, Netherlands
[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Med Microbiol, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Amsterdam Med Ctr, Dept Med Microbiol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Jeroen Bosch Hosp, Dept Occupat Hlth, sHertogenbosch, Netherlands
[5] Jeroen Bosch Hosp, Henri Dunantstr 1, NL-5223 GZ sHertogenbosch, Netherlands
关键词
COVID-19; Point-of-care testing; Panbio; RT-PCR; Rapid antigen detection test; SARS-CoV-2; ANTIGEN TEST;
D O I
10.1016/j.infpip.2021.100142
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: RT-PCR is the current recommended laboratory method to diagnose SARS-CoV-2 in healthcare workers (HCW). As RT-PCR is not widely available and is time-consuming, it limits decision making on removal from and return to work of possibly contagious HCW.Aim: In this study we evaluated the PanbioTM COVID-19 Ag rapid test (PanbioCAgRT) in 825 hospital HCW.Methods and finding: This study consisted of two phases. In the validation phase, we tested hospital HCW with mild symptoms (three days or less) in parallel using the Pan-bioCAgRT and the RT-qPCR test. The PanbioCAgRT demonstrated 86.7% sensitivity, 100% specificity, 100% PPV and 98.5% NPV with regard to RT-qPCR. For HCW with PanbioCAgRT-/ RT-qPCR+, the median Ct value was 30.9, whereas for the HCW with PanbioCAgRT+/RT-qPCR+ the median Ct value was 19.3 (P<0.001). In the second phase, we implemented an on-site antigen test-based strategy for symptomatic hospital HCW: HCW that tested positive with the PanbioCAgRT on-site were considered SARS-CoV-2 positive and were sent home. HCW that tested negative with the PanbioCAgRT on-site were allowed to work with PPE pending RT-qPCR test results from the laboratory. Sensitivity of the antigen test-based strategy was 72.5% and NPV was 97%. For HCW with PanbioCAgRT-/RT-qPCR+ median Ct values were 27.8.Conclusion: The PanbioCAgRTt validated in this study showed a high sensitivity and spe-cificity in samples obtained from HCW with high viral loads. The antigen-based testing strategy proposed in this study seems to be effective, safe and easy to implement in a wide range of occupational healthcare settings.& COPY; 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The Healthcare Infection Society. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Clinical application of the Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag rapid test device and SSf-COVID19 kit for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection
    Sang-Min Oh
    Jee-Soo Lee
    Hyeon Jae Jo
    Donghwan Kim
    Dohyeon Park
    Young Hoon Hwang
    Yunsang Choi
    Chan Mi Lee
    Seungjae Lee
    Euijin Chang
    Eunyoung Lee
    Taek Soo Kim
    Moon-Woo Seong
    Pyoeng Gyun Choe
    Nam Joong Kim
    BMC Research Notes, 15
  • [2] Clinical application of the Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag rapid test device and SSf-COVID19 kit for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection
    Oh, Sang-Min
    Lee, Jee-Soo
    Jo, Hyeon Jae
    Kim, Donghwan
    Park, Dohyeon
    Hwang, Young Hoon
    Choi, Yunsang
    Lee, Chan Mi
    Lee, Seungjae
    Chang, Euijin
    Lee, Eunyoung
    Kim, Taek Soo
    Seong, Moon-Woo
    Choe, Pyoeng Gyun
    Kim, Nam Joong
    BMC RESEARCH NOTES, 2022, 15 (01)
  • [3] Multicenter evaluation of the Panbio™ COVID-19 rapid antigen-detection test for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection
    Merino, Paloma
    Guinea, Jesus
    Munoz-Gallego, Irene
    Gonzalez-Donapetry, Patricia
    Carlos Galan, Juan
    Antona, Nerea
    Cilla, Gustavo
    Hernaez-Crespo, Silvia
    Luis Diaz-de Tuesta, Jose
    Gual-de Torrella, Ana
    Gonzalez-Romo, Fernando
    Escribano, Pilar
    Angel Sanchez-Castellano, Miguel
    Sota-Busselo, Mercedes
    Delgado-Iribarren, Alberto
    Garcia, Julio
    Canton, Rafael
    Munoz, Patricia
    Dolores Folgueira, Maria
    Cuenca-Estrella, Manuel
    Oteo-Iglesias, Jesus
    CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2021, 27 (05) : 758 - 761
  • [4] Evaluation of a rapid antigen test (Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag rapid test device) for SARS-CoV-2 detection in asymptomatic close contacts of COVID-19 patients
    Torres, Ignacio
    Poujois, Sandrine
    Albert, Eliseo
    Colomina, Javier
    Navarro, David
    CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2021, 27 (04) : 636.e1 - 636.e4
  • [5] Symptomatic recurrence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in healthcare workers recovered from COVID-19
    Atici, Serkan
    Ek, Omer Faruk
    Yildiz, Mehmet Siddik
    Sikgenc, Mehmet Mahfuz
    Guzel, Efraim
    Soysal, Ahmet
    JOURNAL OF INFECTION IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES, 2021, 15 (01): : 69 - 72
  • [6] Factors associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection amongst healthcare workers in a COVID-19 designated hospital
    Al Youha, Sarah
    Alowaish, Osama
    Ibrahim, Islam K.
    Alghounaim, Mohammad
    Abu-Sheasha, Ghada A.
    Fakhra, Zainab
    Al Hendi, Sarah
    AlQabandi, Yousif
    Almazeedi, Sulaiman
    Al Asoomi, Fatima
    Al-Sabah, Salman
    JOURNAL OF INFECTION AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 14 (09) : 1226 - 1232
  • [7] Clinitest rapid COVID-19 antigen test for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection: A multicenter evaluation study
    Merino-Amador, Paloma
    Gonzalez-Donapetry, Patricia
    Dominguez-Fernandez, Mercedes
    Gonzalez-Romo, Fernando
    Angel Sanchez-Castellano, Miguel
    Seoane-Estevez, Alejandro
    Delgado-Iribarren, Alberto
    Garcia, Julio
    Bou, German
    Cuenca-Estrella, Manuel
    Oteo-Iglesias, Jesus
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY, 2021, 143
  • [8] Urgent care study of the LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 Ag Test for rapid diagnosis of COVID-19
    Jared Gresh
    Harold Kisner
    Brian DuChateau
    Diagnostic and Prognostic Research, 5 (1)
  • [9] The Panbio COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test: Which Performances are for COVID-19 Diagnosis?
    Farfour, Eric
    Amiel, Carline
    Jolly, Emilie
    Zia-Chahabi, Sara
    Mazaux, Laurence
    Simonin, Pauline
    Berkane, Ines
    Cornily, Martine
    Pascreau, Tiffany
    Vasse, Marc
    CLINICAL LABORATORY, 2021, 67 (11) : 2525 - 2532
  • [10] Field evaluation of a rapid antigen test (Panbio™ COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device) for COVID-19 diagnosis in primary healthcare centres
    Albert, Eliseo
    Torres, Ignacio
    Bueno, Felipe
    Huntley, Dixie
    Molla, Estefania
    Angel Fernandez-Fuentes, Miguel
    Martinez, Mireia
    Poujois, Sandrine
    Forque, Lorena
    Valdivia, Arantxa
    Solano de la Asuncion, Carlos
    Ferrer, Josep
    Colomina, Javier
    Navarro, David
    CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2021, 27 (03) : 472.e7 - 472.e10