Goal-based models for discrete choice analysis

被引:7
作者
Marley, A. A. J. [1 ,2 ]
Swait, J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Victoria, Dept Psychol, POB 1700 STN CSC, Victoria, BC V8W 2Y2, Canada
[2] UniSA Business Sch, Inst Choice, Level 13,140 Arthur St, Sydney, NSW 2060, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Choice model; Hybrid model; Goals; Heterogeneity; Multi-stage choice; Probabilistic choice; Strategy; RANDOM REGRET MINIMIZATION; RANDOM UTILITY; STOCHASTIC CHOICE; DECISION-MAKING; ATTITUDES; PREFERENCES; UNCERTAINTY; TRAITS; LOGIT; AREA;
D O I
10.1016/j.trb.2017.03.005
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Goals direct decision making, from the most abstract levels of motivation to the multitudinous details of evaluation of options available for choice. However, the pervasive influence of goals in decision processes is generally not explicitly recognized at the level of demand model formulation and specification. In applied economics generally, and transportation specifically, demand models relate product/service attributes directly to behavior, using utility (or value) as a shorthand representation for the impact of goals. In this paper we argue that this is a limiting view that restricts our thinking about decision making and, hence, our representation and inference-making about that behavior. We support this argument by reinterpreting and/or extending various applications of hybrid models in transportation to a goal-based framework and formulating goal-based choice models which recognize that goals (1) are drivers of choice, (2) explain the choice of strategy, (3) are part of the constraint set and (4) contribute to explaining impacts of the decision context on the allocation of cognitive resources by the decision maker. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:72 / 88
页数:17
相关论文
共 71 条
  • [1] Abou-Zeid M., 2014, Handbook of Choice Modelling, P383, DOI DOI 10.4337/9781781003152.00025
  • [2] Stochastic Choice and Preferences for Randomization
    Agranov, Marina
    Ortoleva, Pietro
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2017, 125 (01) : 40 - 68
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1959, INDIVIDUAL CHOICE BE
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1993, ADAPTIVE DECISION MA
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1995, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, DOI [10.1016/0969-6989(95)00038-0, DOI 10.1016/0969-6989(95)00038-0]
  • [6] Goal constructs in psychology: Structure, process, and content
    Austin, JT
    Vancouver, JB
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1996, 120 (03) : 338 - 375
  • [7] Preference and lifestyle heterogeneity among potential plug-in electric vehicle buyers
    Axsen, Jonn
    Bailey, Joseph
    Castro, Marisol Andrea
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2015, 50 : 190 - 201
  • [8] Hybrid choice models: Progress and challenges
    Ben-Akiva, M
    Mcfadden, D
    Train, K
    Walker, J
    Bhat, C
    Bierlaire, M
    Bolduc, D
    Boersch-Supan, A
    Brownstone, D
    Bunch, DS
    Daly, A
    De Palma, A
    Gopinath, D
    Karlstrom, A
    Munizaga, MA
    [J]. MARKETING LETTERS, 2002, 13 (03) : 163 - 175
  • [9] Ben-Akiva M., 1985, Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand
  • [10] Bliemer M. C. J., 2015, 14 INT C TRAV BEH RE