Extramural depth of tumor invasion at thin-section MR in patients with rectal cancer: Results of the MERCURY Study

被引:339
作者
Fowler, J. M. [1 ]
Beagley, C. E. [1 ]
Blomqvist, L. [1 ]
Brown, G. [1 ]
Daniels, I. R. [1 ]
Heald, R. J. [1 ]
Moran, B. J. [1 ]
Norman, A. R. [1 ]
Peppercorn, P. D. [1 ]
Quirke, P. [1 ]
Sebag-Montefiore, D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal Marsden Hosp, Dept Radiol, Sutton SM2 5PT, Surrey, England
关键词
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2431051825
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To prospectively evaluate the accuracy of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in depicting the extramural depth of tumor invasion in patients who have rectal cancer, with histopathologic results as the reference standard. Materials and Methods: The Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Rectal Cancer European Equivalence ( MERCURY) Study received ethics approval from all participating centers, and all patients gave informed consent. Consecutive patients ( n = 679) with adenocarcinoma of the rectum consented to participate. Imaging workshops for participating specialist gastrointestinal radiologists were held to ensure standardization of image acquisition techniques. Standardized MR image interpretation and data reporting were performed by using previously validated criteria. MR images were prospectively singly read by the specialist gastrointestinal radiologists. The maximal extramural depth (EMD) of tumor spread, defined at histopathologic analysis as the distance from the outer edge of the longitudinal muscularis propria to the outer edge of the tumor, was measured and recorded. The maximal EMD was the reference standard. The MR and histopathologic results were considered to be equivalent when the 95% confidence interval of the difference between them was within +/- 0.5 mm. Results: Tumor EMD measurements obtained at both MR imaging and histopathologic analysis were available for 295 ( 95%) of 311 patients after primary surgery. Mean EMDs were 2.80 mm +/- 4.60 ( standard deviation) and 2.81 mm +/- 4.28 at MR imaging and histopathologic analysis, respectively. The mean difference between the MR-derived and histopathologically derived EMDs was -0.05 mm +/- 3.85 ( 95% confidence interval: -0.49 mm, 0.40 mm). Therefore, MR and histopathologic assessments of tumor spread were considered equivalent to within 0.5 mm. Conclusion: Demonstration of accurate measurement of the depth of extramural tumor spread in the MERCURY Study enabled accurate preoperative prognostication.
引用
收藏
页码:132 / 139
页数:8
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in prediction of tumour-free resection margin in rectal cancer surgery
    Beets-Tan, RGH
    Beets, GL
    Vliegen, RFA
    Kessels, AGH
    Van Boven, H
    De Bruine, A
    von Meyenfeldt, MF
    Baeten, CGMI
    van Engelshoven, JMA
    [J]. LANCET, 2001, 357 (9255) : 497 - 504
  • [2] Rectal cancer: Local staging and assessment of lymph node involvement with endoluminal US, CT, and MR imaging - A meta-analysis
    Bipat, S
    Glas, AS
    Slors, FJM
    Zwinderman, AH
    Bossuyt, PMM
    Stoker, J
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2004, 232 (03) : 773 - 783
  • [3] Blomqvist L, 1997, ACTA RADIOL, V38, P437
  • [4] Rectal adenocarcinoma: assessment of tumour involvement of the lateral resection margin by MRI of resected specimen
    Blomqvist, L
    Rubio, C
    Holm, T
    Machado, M
    Hindmarsh, T
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1999, 72 (853) : 18 - 23
  • [5] Morphologic predictors of lymph node status in rectal cancer with use of high-spatial-resolution MR imaging with histopathologic comparison
    Brown, G
    Richards, CJ
    Bourne, MW
    Newcombe, RG
    Radcliffe, AG
    Dallimore, NS
    Williams, GT
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2003, 227 (02) : 371 - 377
  • [6] High-resolution MRI of the anatomy important in total mesorectal excision of the rectum
    Brown, G
    Kirkham, A
    Williams, GT
    Bourne, M
    Radcliffe, AG
    Sayman, J
    Newell, R
    Sinnatamby, C
    Heald, RJ
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2004, 182 (02) : 431 - 439
  • [7] Preoperative assessment of prognostic factors in rectal cancer using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging
    Brown, G
    Radcliffe, AG
    Newcombe, RG
    Dallimore, NS
    Bourne, MW
    Williams, GT
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2003, 90 (03) : 355 - 364
  • [8] Rectal carcinoma: Thin-section MR imaging for staging in 28 patients
    Brown, G
    Richards, CJ
    Newcombe, RG
    Dallimore, NS
    Radcliffe, AG
    Carey, DP
    Bourne, MW
    Williams, GT
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1999, 211 (01) : 215 - 222
  • [9] Colorectal cancer pathology reporting: A regional audit
    Bull, AD
    Biffin, AHB
    Mella, J
    Radcliffe, AG
    Stamatakis, JD
    Steele, RJC
    Williams, GT
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 1997, 50 (02) : 138 - 142
  • [10] Compton Carolyn C, 2002, Clin Colorectal Cancer, V2, P149, DOI 10.3816/CCC.2002.n.020