A novel hybrid MCDM model combining the SAW, TOPSIS and GRA methods based on experimental design

被引:203
作者
Wang, Peng [1 ]
Zhu, Zhouquan [1 ]
Wang, Yonghu [2 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Polytech Univ, Sch Marine Sci & Technol, Xian 710072, Peoples R China
[2] Civil Aviat Flight Univ China, Flight Technol Coll, Guanghan 618307, Sichuan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Multiple criteria decision making; SAW; TOPSIS; GRA; Experimental design; Response surface methodology; GREY RELATIONAL ANALYSIS; DECISION-MAKING; MOORA METHOD; SELECTION; AHP; OPTIMIZATION; ALGORITHM;
D O I
10.1016/j.ins.2016.01.076
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) is a difficult task because the existing alternatives are frequently in conflict with each other. This study presents a hybrid MCDM method combining simple additive weighting (SAW), techniques for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS) and grey relational analysis (GRA) techniques. A feature of this method is that it employs an experimental design technique to assign attribute weights and then combines different MCDM evaluation methods to construct the hybrid decision-making model. This model can guide a decision maker in making a reasonable judgment without requiring professional skills or extensive experience. The ranking results agreed upon by multiple MCDM methods are more trustworthy than those generated by a single MCDM method. The proposed method is illustrated in a practical application scenario involving an IC packaging company. Four additional numerical examples are provided to demonstrate the applicability of the proposed method. In all of the cases, the results obtained using the proposed method were highly similar to those derived by previous studies, thus proving the validity and capability of this method to solve real-life MCDM problems. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 45
页数:19
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
Afshari A., 2010, International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, V1, P511, DOI DOI 10.7763/IJIMT.2010.V1.89
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1992, Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications
[3]  
[Anonymous], 10 AIAA AV TECHN INT
[4]  
Aruldoss M., 2013, Am. J. Inform. Syst, V1, P31, DOI DOI 10.12691/AJIS-1-1-5
[5]   Modeling and optimization I: Usability of response surface methodology [J].
Bas, Deniz ;
Boyaci, Ismail H. .
JOURNAL OF FOOD ENGINEERING, 2007, 78 (03) :836-845
[6]   Response surface methodology (RSM) as a tool for optimization in analytical chemistry [J].
Bezerra, Marcos Almeida ;
Santelli, Ricardo Erthal ;
Oliveira, Eliane Padua ;
Villar, Leonardo Silveira ;
Escaleira, Luciane Amlia .
TALANTA, 2008, 76 (05) :965-977
[7]   Attribute based specification, comparison and selection of a robot [J].
Bhangale, PP ;
Agrawal, VP ;
Saha, SK .
MECHANISM AND MACHINE THEORY, 2004, 39 (12) :1345-1366
[8]   ON THE EXPERIMENTAL ATTAINMENT OF OPTIMUM CONDITIONS [J].
BOX, GEP ;
WILSON, KB .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 1951, 13 (01) :1-45
[9]   A PREFERENCE RANKING ORGANIZATION METHOD - (THE PROMETHEE METHOD FOR MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING) [J].
BRANS, JP ;
VINCKE, PH .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1985, 31 (06) :647-656
[10]  
Brauers WKM, 2006, CONTROL CYBERN, V35, P445