Analysis of strain around endosseous dental implants opposing natural teeth or implants

被引:22
作者
Hekimoglu, C [1 ]
Anil, N [1 ]
Cehreli, MC [1 ]
机构
[1] Hacettepe Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Prosthodont, TR-06100 Ankara, Turkey
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.07.023
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Statement of problem. Natural teeth and implants have different force transmission characteristics to bone. Purpose. The purpose of this study was to compare strains induced around a natural tooth opposing an implant with strains around occluding implants under static and dynamic loads. Material and methods. Occlusion was created between a natural molar tooth and an implant in 1 side, and 2 implants in the contralateral side of acrylic resin models of both jaws. Strain-gauges were bonded around the neck of the natural tooth and implants, and strains were measured under 75 N and 100 N static axial and lateral dynamic loads in separate load situations using a data acquisition system at sample rate of 1000 Hz. The strain data of the natural tooth and implants were compared for each load by Kruskal-Wallis testing followed by the multiple comparison test (alpha = .05). Results. Compressive strains were induced around natural tooth and implants as a result of static axial loading, whereas combinations of compressive and tensile strains were observed during lateral dynamic loading. Strains around the natural tooth were significantly lower than the opposing implant and occluding implants in the contralateral side for most regions under all loading conditions (P < .05). There was a general tendency for increased strains around the implant opposing natural tooth under higher loads and particularly under lateral dynamic loading (P < .05). Conclusion. Under static and dynamic loads, strain magnitudes around a natural tooth were significantly lower than that of an opposing implant and occluding implants in the contralateral side.
引用
收藏
页码:441 / 446
页数:6
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   A natural tooth's stress distribution in occlusion with a dental implant [J].
Akpinar, I ;
Anil, N ;
Parnas, L .
JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2000, 27 (06) :538-545
[2]   Osteoinduction, osteoconduction and osseointegration [J].
Albrektsson, T ;
Johansson, C .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2001, 10 (Suppl 2) :S96-S101
[3]  
Astrand P, 1999, Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, V1, P17, DOI 10.1111/j.1708-8208.1999.tb00087.x
[4]   EFFECT OF SPLINTING ON ABUTMENT TOOTH MOVEMENT [J].
AYDINLIK, E ;
DAYANGAC, B ;
CELIK, E .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1983, 49 (04) :477-480
[5]  
Block MS, 2002, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V17, P473
[6]   10-YEAR SURVIVAL RATES OF FIXED PROSTHESES ON 4 OR 6 IMPLANTS AD-MODUM BRANEMARK IN FULL EDENTULISM [J].
BRANEMARK, PI ;
SVENSSON, B ;
VANSTEENBERGHE, D .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 1995, 6 (04) :227-231
[7]   OSSEOINTEGRATION AND ITS EXPERIMENTAL BACKGROUND [J].
BRANEMARK, PI .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1983, 50 (03) :399-410
[8]   MECHANICAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE IMPLANT TOOTH-SUPPORTED FIXED PARTIAL DENTURE [J].
BREEDING, LC ;
DIXON, DL ;
SADLER, JP ;
MCKAY, ML .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1995, 74 (05) :487-492
[9]   APPARENT INTRUSION OF NATURAL TEETH UNDER AN IMPLANT-SUPPORTED PROSTHESIS - A CLINICAL REPORT [J].
CHO, GC ;
CHEE, WWL .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1992, 68 (01) :3-5
[10]  
DONG WK, 1985, PHSYL PROPERTIES INT, P389