The effects of allowance price on energy demand under a personal carbon trading scheme

被引:39
作者
Fan, Jin [1 ]
Li, Jun [1 ]
Wu, Yanrui [2 ]
Wang, Shanyong [1 ]
Zhao, Dingtao [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sci & Technol China, Sch Management, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Western Australia, Sch Business, Nedlands, WA 6009, Australia
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Energy; Personal carbon trading; Allowance price; Income effect; Substitution effect; COST PASS-THROUGH; EMISSIONS; CONSUMPTION; EFFICIENCY; UPSTREAM; DOWNSTREAM; CHINA;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.02.111
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Personal carbon trading (PCT) is a downstream cap-and-trade scheme which could be used to reduce carbon emissions from the household sector. To explore the effectiveness of this scheme, it is necessary to investigate how consumers respond to allowance price change. In this paper, a general utility optimization (GUO) model and a constant elasticity of substitution (CES) utility function are proposed to examine the price, substitution and income effects of carbon allowance price changes. It is shown that higher income consumers are more sensitive to the allowance price changes than lower income consumers. Moreover, the short-run adjustment in consumers' consumption of electricity in response to a change in allowance price would be lower than the long-run value. According to the sensitivity analysis, downward (upward) adjustments in the elasticity of substitution result in a positive (negative) effect on price effect. The findings in this study are used to draw policy implications. Suggestions for future research are also provided. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:242 / 249
页数:8
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   Cost pass-through of the EU emissions allowances: Examining the European petroleum markets [J].
Alexeeva-Talebi, Victoria .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2011, 33 :S75-S83
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, DOMESTIC TRADABLE QU
[3]  
[Anonymous], AM COMM SURV
[4]  
Azevedo I., 2011, The Electricity Journal, V24, P21, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.TEJ.2010.12.004
[5]   Influence of India's transformation on residential energy demand [J].
Bhattacharyya, Subhes C. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2015, 143 :228-237
[6]   Consumer lifestyle approach to US energy use and the related CO2 emissions [J].
Bin, S ;
Dowlatabadi, H .
ENERGY POLICY, 2005, 33 (02) :197-208
[7]  
Bird J, 2008, POLITICAL ACCEPTABIL
[8]   Feasible climate targets: The roles of economic growth, coalition development and expectations [J].
Blanford, Geoffrey J. ;
Richels, Richard G. ;
Rutherford, Thomas F. .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2009, 31 :S82-S93
[9]   Inducing low-carbon investment in the electric power industry through a price floor for emissions trading [J].
Brauneis, Alexander ;
Mestel, Roland ;
Palan, Stefan .
ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 53 :190-204
[10]   Public acceptability of personal carbon trading and carbon tax [J].
Bristow, Abigail L. ;
Wardman, Mark ;
Zanni, Alberto M. ;
Chintakayala, Phani K. .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 69 (09) :1824-1837