Defining dimensions of research readiness: a conceptual model for primary care research networks

被引:11
作者
Carr, Helen [1 ]
de Lusignan, Simon [1 ]
Liyanage, Harshana [1 ]
Liaw, Siaw-Teng [2 ]
Terry, Amanda [3 ]
Rafi, Imran [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Surrey, Clin Informat & Hlth Outcomes Res Grp, Dept Hlth Care Management & Policy, Guildford GU2 5XH, Surrey, England
[2] UNSW Med Australia, Sch Publ Hlth & Community Med, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
[3] Univ Western Ontario, Schulich Sch Med & Dent, Western Ctr Publ Hlth & Family Med, Ctr Studies Family Med, London, ON N6A 5C1, Canada
[4] Royal Coll Gen Practitioners, London NW1 2FB, England
关键词
General practice; Research; Medical records systems; computerised; Data collection; Patient selection; CLINICAL-DATA; HEALTH; DATABASE; RECRUITMENT; MORTALITY; LESSONS; DOCTORS; QUALITY; TRIALS; READY;
D O I
10.1186/s12875-014-0169-6
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Recruitment to research studies in primary care is challenging despite widespread implementation of electronic patient record (EPR) systems which potentially make it easier to identify eligible cases. Methods: Literature review and applying the learning from a European research readiness assessment tool, the TRANSFoRm International Research Readiness instrument (TIRRE), to the context of the English NHS in order to develop a model to assess a practice's research readiness. Results: Seven dimensions of research readiness were identified: (1) Data readiness: Is there good data quality in EPR systems; (2) Record readiness: Are EPR data able to identify eligible cases and other study data; (3) Organisational readiness: Are the health system and socio-cultural environment supportive; (4) Governance readiness: Does the study meet legal and local health system regulatory compliance; (5) Study-specific readiness; (6) Business process readiness: Are business processes tilted in favour of participation: including capacity and capability to take on extra work, financial incentives as well as intangibles such as social and intellectual capital; (7) Patient readiness: Are systems in place to recruit patients and obtain informed consent? Conclusions: The model might enable the development of interventions to increase participation in primary care-based research and become a tool to measure the progress of practice networks towards the most advanced state of readiness.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Defining dimensions of research readiness: a conceptual model for primary care research networks
    Helen Carr
    Simon de Lusignan
    Harshana Liyanage
    Siaw-Teng Liaw
    Amanda Terry
    Imran Rafi
    BMC Family Practice, 15
  • [2] Defining and Measuring Successful Emergency Care Networks: A Research Agenda
    Glickman, Seth W.
    Delgado, M. Kit
    Hirshon, Jon Mark
    Hollander, Judd E.
    Iwashyna, Theodore J.
    Jacobs, Alice K.
    Kilaru, Austin S.
    Lorch, Scott A.
    Mutter, Ryan L.
    Myers, Sage R.
    Owens, Pamela L.
    Phelan, Michael P.
    Pines, Jesse M.
    Seymour, Christopher W.
    Wang, N. Ewen
    Branas, Charles C.
    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2010, 17 (12) : 1297 - 1305
  • [3] Increasing Primary Care Comorbidity: A Conceptual Research and Practice Framework
    Corser, William D.
    RESEARCH AND THEORY FOR NURSING PRACTICE, 2011, 25 (04) : 238 - 251
  • [4] Professional learning networks: a conceptual model and research opportunities
    Poortman, Cindy L.
    Brown, Chris
    Schildkamp, Kim
    EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2022, 64 (01) : 95 - 112
  • [5] Towards efficient use of research resources: a nationwide database of ongoing primary care research projects in the Netherlands
    Kortekaas, Marlous F.
    van de Pol, Alma C.
    van der Horst, Henriette E.
    Burgers, Jako S.
    Slort, Willemjan
    de Wit, Niek J.
    FAMILY PRACTICE, 2014, 31 (02) : 229 - 235
  • [6] The Spanish primary care collaborative research network (REDIAPP):: a model of research on psychiatry in primary care for export?
    Garcia-Campayo, Javier
    Magallon, Rosa
    Monreal, Antonio
    Bolibar, Boni
    Martin Zurro, Amando
    PRIMARY CARE & COMMUNITY PSYCHIATRY, 2007, 12 (3-4) : 131 - 135
  • [7] Evaluating Primary Care Research Networks: A Review of Currently Available Tools
    Bleeker, Joan M. C.
    Stalman, Wim A. B.
    van der Horst, Henriette E.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BOARD OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2010, 23 (04) : 465 - 475
  • [8] Practice-based research networks: Building the infrastructure of primary care research
    Nutting, PA
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY PRACTICE, 1996, 42 (02) : 199 - 203
  • [9] Global health and primary care research
    Beasley, John W.
    Starfield, Barbara
    van Weel, Chris
    Rosser, Walter W.
    Haq, Cynthia L.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BOARD OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2007, 20 (06) : 518 - 526
  • [10] Employers and Universities: Conceptual Dimensions, Research Evidence and Implications
    Tomlinson, Michael
    HIGHER EDUCATION POLICY, 2021, 34 (01) : 132 - 154