Diagnostic delay for giant cell arteritis - a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:67
作者
Prior, James A. [1 ]
Ranjbar, Hoda [1 ]
Belcher, John [1 ]
Mackie, Sarah L. [2 ,3 ]
Helliwell, Toby [1 ]
Liddle, Jennifer [1 ,4 ]
Mallen, Christian D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Keele Univ, Res Inst Primary Care & Hlth Sci, Newcastle Upon Tyne ST5 5BG, Tyne & Wear, England
[2] Univ Leeds, Leeds Inst Rheumat & Musculoskeletal Med, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[3] NIHR Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomed Res Unit, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[4] Newcastle Univ, Inst Hlth & Soc, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
来源
BMC MEDICINE | 2017年 / 15卷
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
Diagnostic delay; Giant cell arteritis; Meta-analysis; Systematic review; TEMPORAL ARTERITIS; POLYMYALGIA-RHEUMATICA; CLINICAL SPECTRUM; VISUAL MANIFESTATIONS; AORTIC-ANEURYSM; BIOPSY-PROVEN; POPULATION; DISEASE; ONSET; RISK;
D O I
10.1186/s12916-017-0871-z
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Giant cell arteritis (GCA), if untreated, can lead to blindness and stroke. The study's objectives were to (1) determine a new evidence-based benchmark of the extent of diagnostic delay for GCA and (2) examine the role of GCA-specific characteristics on diagnostic delay. Methods: Medical literature databases were searched from inception to November 2015. Articles were included if reporting a time-period of diagnostic delay between onset of GCA symptoms and diagnosis. Two reviewers assessed the quality of the final articles and extracted data from these. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to pool the mean time-period (95% confidence interval (CI)) between GCA symptom onset and diagnosis, and the delay observed for GCA-specific characteristics. Heterogeneity was assessed by I-2 and by 95% prediction interval (PI). Results: Of 4128 articles initially identified, 16 provided data for meta-analysis. Mean diagnostic delay was 9.0 weeks (95% CI, 6.5 to 11.4) between symptom onset and GCA diagnosis (I-2 = 96.0%; P < 0.001; 95% PI, 0 to 19.2 weeks). Patients with a cranial presentation of GCA received a diagnosis after 7.7 (95% CI, 2.7 to 12.8) weeks (I-2 = 98.4%; P < 0.001; 95% PI, 0 to 27.6 weeks) and those with non-cranial GCA after 17.6 (95% CI, 9.7 to 25.5) weeks (I-2 = 96.6%; P < 0.001; 95% PI, 0 to 46.1 weeks). Conclusions: The mean delay from symptom onset to GCA diagnosis was 9 weeks, or longer when cranial symptoms were absent. Our research provides an evidence-based benchmark for diagnostic delay of GCA and supports the need for improved public awareness and fast-track diagnostic pathways.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
AIELLO PD, 1993, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V100, P550
[2]   Diagnosis and management of giant cell arteritis [J].
Barraclough, Kevin ;
Mallen, Christian D. ;
Helliwell, Toby ;
Hider, Samantha L. ;
Dasgupta, Bhaskar .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2012, 62 (599) :329-330
[3]  
Brack A, 1999, ARTHRITIS RHEUM, V42, P311, DOI 10.1002/1529-0131(199902)42:2<311::AID-ANR14>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-F
[5]   GIANT-CELL ARTERITIS (TEMPORAL ARTERITIS) PRESENTING AS FEVER OF UNDETERMINED ORIGIN [J].
CALAMIA, KT ;
HUNDER, GG .
ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 1981, 24 (11) :1414-1418
[6]  
CUETO FB, 1985, MED CLIN-BARCELONA, V85, P43
[7]   Sonographic and clinical pattern of extracranial and cranial giant cell arteritis [J].
Czihal, M. ;
Zanker, S. ;
Rademacher, A. ;
Tato, F. ;
Kuhlencordt, P. J. ;
Schulze-Koops, H. ;
Hoffmann, U. .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2012, 41 (03) :231-236
[8]   Projected Worldwide Disease Burden from Giant Cell Arteritis by 2050 [J].
De Smit, Elisabeth ;
Palmer, Andrew J. ;
Hewitt, Alex W. .
JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2015, 42 (01) :119-125
[9]   TEMPORAL ARTERITIS - THE SILENT PRESENTATION AND DELAY IN DIAGNOSIS [J].
DESMET, GD ;
KNOCKAERT, DC ;
BOBBAERS, HJ .
JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1990, 227 (04) :237-240
[10]   Biopsy proven and biopsy negative temporal arteritis:: differences in clinical spectrum at the onset of the disease [J].
Duhaut, P ;
Pinède, L ;
Bornet, H ;
Demolombe-Ragué, S ;
Dumontet, C ;
Ninet, J ;
Loire, R ;
Pasquier, J .
ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 1999, 58 (06) :335-341