共 62 条
Improving secure messaging: A framework for support, partnership & information-giving communicating electronically (SPICE)
被引:7
作者:
Alpert, Jordan M.
[1
]
Wang, Shu
[2
]
Bylund, Carma L.
[3
]
Markham, Merry Jennifer
[4
]
Bjarnadottir, Ragnhildur, I
[5
]
Lee, Ji-Hyun
[2
]
Lafata, Jennifer Elston
[6
,7
]
Salloum, Ramzi G.
[8
]
机构:
[1] Univ Florida, Dept Advertising, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Dept Biostat, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[3] Univ Florida, Dept Publ Relat, Div Hematol & Oncol, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[4] Univ Florida, Dept Med, Div Hematol & Oncol, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[5] Univ Florida, Coll Nursing, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[6] Univ N Carolina, UNC Eshelman Sch Pharm, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[7] Univ N Carolina, UNC Lineberger Comprehens Canc Ctr, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[8] Univ Florida, Dept Hlth Outcomes & Biomed Informat, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
关键词:
Patient-Provider Communication;
Patient Portal;
Discrete Choice Experiment;
Patient-Centered Communication;
PATIENT-CENTERED COMMUNICATION;
PHYSICIAN COMMUNICATION;
DECISION-MAKING;
E-MAIL;
CANCER;
CARE;
PARTICIPATION;
WORKFLOW;
PEOPLE;
ACCESS;
D O I:
10.1016/j.pec.2020.11.021
中图分类号:
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号:
1004 ;
120402 ;
摘要:
Background: Patient-centered communication benefits patients and is widely endorsed. However, it is primarily associated with face-to-face contexts, although patients are increasingly using electronic platforms, such as secure messaging in patient portals, to communicate with providers. Purpose: Given the popularity of secure messaging and its ability to impact the patient-provider relationship, this study aimed to determine which attributes of patient-centered communication are most desired by cancer patients using secure messaging. Methods: A 26 balanced incomplete block design discrete choice experiment was conducted using the best-worst scaling technique. Respondents were asked to select their most and least preferred attributes of two simulated patient-provider exchanges within each of eight choice sets. Results: 210 respondents indicated that either level of partnership (high and low) and either level of information-giving (high and low) were most preferred, while response times greater than 24 hours and low levels of support were least favored. Conclusions: Similar to face-to-face communication, patients value aspects of patient-centered communication in the secure messaging setting and desire them to be included in provider replies. Practice Implications: Patient-centered communication is important to patients using secure messaging. Providers should incorporate SPICE (Support, Partnership, and Information-giving while Communicating Electronically). (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1380 / 1386
页数:7
相关论文