Differentiation between benign and malignant vertebral compression fractures using qualitative and quantitative analysis of a single fast spin echo T2-weighted Dixon sequence

被引:16
作者
Bacher, Sebastien [1 ,2 ]
Hajdu, Steven David [1 ,2 ]
Maeder, Yael [1 ,2 ]
Dunet, Vincent [1 ,2 ]
Hilbert, Tom [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Omoumi, Patrick [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Lausanne Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Rue Bugnon 46, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
[2] Univ Lausanne, Rue Bugnon 46, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
[3] Siemens Healthcare AG, Adv Clin Imaging Technol, Lausanne, Switzerland
[4] Ecole Polytech Fed Lausanne EPFL, LTS5, Lausanne, Switzerland
关键词
Magnetic resonance imaging; Spinal fractures; Compression fractures; Bone marrow; Diagnostic imaging; FAT-SUPPRESSION; DISCRIMINATE BENIGN; MRI; FRACTION;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-021-07947-1
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objectives To determine and compare the qualitative and quantitative diagnostic performance of a single sagittal fast spin echo (FSE) T2-weighted Dixon sequence in differentiating benign and malignant vertebral compression fractures (VCF), using multiple readers and different quantitative methods. Methods From July 2014 to June 2020, 95 consecutive patients with spine MRI performed prior to cementoplasty for acute VCFs were retrospectively included. VCFs were categorized as benign (n = 63, mean age = 76 +/- 12 years) or malignant (n = 32, mean age = 63 +/- 12 years) with a best valuable comparator as a reference. Qualitative analysis was independently performed by four radiologists by categorizing each VCF as either benign or malignant using only the image sets provided by FSE T2-weighted Dixon sequences. Quantitative analysis was performed using two different regions of interest (ROI1-2) and three methods (signal drop, fat fraction (FF) from ROIs, FF maps). Diagnostic performance was compared using ROC curves analyses. Interobserver agreement was assessed using kappa statistics and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Results The qualitative diagnostic performance ranged from area under the curve (AUC) = 0.97 (95% CI: 0.91-1.00) to AUC = 0.99 (95% CI: 0.95-1.0). The quantitative diagnostic performance ranged from AUC = 0.82 (95% CI: 0.73-0.89) to AUC = 0.97 (95% CI: 0.91-0.99). Pairwise comparisons showed no statistical difference in diagnostic performance (all p > 0.0013, Bonferroni-corrected p < 0.0011). All five cases with disagreement among the readers were correctly diagnosed at quantitative analysis using ROI2. Interobserver agreement was excellent for both qualitative and quantitative analyses. Conclusions A single FSE T2-weighted Dixon sequence can be used to differentiate benign and malignant VCF with high diagnostic performance using both qualitative and quantitative analyses, which can provide complementary information.
引用
收藏
页码:9418 / 9427
页数:10
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Fat-Suppression Techniques for 3-T MR Imaging of the Musculoskeletal System [J].
Del Grande, Filippo ;
Santini, Francesco ;
Herzka, Daniel A. ;
Aro, Michael R. ;
Dean, Cooper W. ;
Gold, Garry E. ;
Carrino, John A. .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2014, 34 (01) :217-233
[2]   Fat suppression in MR imaging: Techniques and pitfalls [J].
Delfaut, EM ;
Beltran, J ;
Johnson, G ;
Rousseau, J ;
Marchandise, X ;
Cotten, A .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 1999, 19 (02) :373-382
[3]   COMPARING THE AREAS UNDER 2 OR MORE CORRELATED RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES - A NONPARAMETRIC APPROACH [J].
DELONG, ER ;
DELONG, DM ;
CLARKEPEARSON, DI .
BIOMETRICS, 1988, 44 (03) :837-845
[4]   SIMPLE PROTON SPECTROSCOPIC IMAGING [J].
DIXON, WT .
RADIOLOGY, 1984, 153 (01) :189-194
[5]   A Novel Classification System for Spinal Instability in Neoplastic Disease An Evidence-Based Approach and Expert Consensus From the Spine Oncology Study Group [J].
Fisher, Charles G. ;
DiPaola, Christian P. ;
Ryken, Timothy C. ;
Bilsky, Mark H. ;
Shaffrey, Christopher I. ;
Berven, Sigurd H. ;
Harrop, James S. ;
Fehlings, Michael G. ;
Boriani, Stefano ;
Chou, Dean ;
Schmidt, Meic H. ;
Polly, David W. ;
Biagini, Roberto ;
Burch, Shane ;
Dekutoski, Mark B. ;
Ganju, Aruna ;
Gerszten, Peter C. ;
Gokaslan, Ziya L. ;
Groff, Michael W. ;
Liebsch, Norbert J. ;
Mendel, Ehud ;
Okuno, Scott H. ;
Patel, Shreyaskumar ;
Rhines, Laurence D. ;
Rose, Peter S. ;
Sciubba, Daniel M. ;
Sundaresan, Narayan ;
Tomita, Katsuro ;
Varga, Peter P. ;
Vialle, Luiz R. ;
Vrionis, Frank D. ;
Yamada, Yoshiya ;
Fourney, Daryl R. .
SPINE, 2010, 35 (22) :E1221-E1229
[6]   Comparison of Qualitative and Quantitative Evaluation of Diffusion-Weighted MRI and Chemical-Shift Imaging in the Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Vertebral Body Fractures [J].
Geith, Tobias ;
Schmidt, Gerwin ;
Biffar, Andreas ;
Dietrich, Olaf ;
Duerr, Hans Roland ;
Reiser, Maximilian ;
Baur-Melnyk, Andrea .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2012, 199 (05) :1083-1092
[7]   Fat Suppression with Dixon Techniques in Musculoskeletal Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Pictorial Review [J].
Guerini, Henri ;
Omoumi, Patrick ;
Guichoux, Francois ;
Vuillemin, Valerie ;
Morvan, Gerard ;
Zins, Marc ;
Thevenin, Fabrice ;
Drape, Jean Luc .
SEMINARS IN MUSCULOSKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2015, 19 (04) :335-347
[8]   Differentiation of Acute Osteoporotic and Malignant Vertebral Fractures by Quantification of Fat Fraction With a Dixon MRI Sequence [J].
Kim, Dong Hyun ;
Yoo, Hye Jin ;
Hong, Sung Hwan ;
Choi, Ja-Young ;
Chae, Hee Dong ;
Chung, Bo Mi .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2017, 209 (06) :1331-1339
[9]   Fat fraction estimation of morphologically normal lumbar vertebrae using the two-point mDixon turbo spin-echo MRI with flexible echo times and multipeak spectral model of fat: Comparison between cancer and non-cancer patients [J].
Lee, Seung Hyun ;
Lee, Young Han ;
Hahn, Seok ;
Suh, Jin-Suck .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2016, 34 (08) :1114-1120
[10]   Reliability and Validity of Different MRI Sequences in Improving the Accuracy of Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Vertebral Fractures: A Meta-Analysis [J].
Li, Kun ;
Huang, Lixin ;
Lang, Zhijin ;
Ni, Li ;
Du, Jun ;
Yang, Huilin .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2019, 213 (02) :427-436