Integrating Multimodal Arguments Into High School Writing Instruction

被引:26
作者
Howell, Emily [1 ,2 ]
Butler, Tracy [3 ]
Reinking, David [4 ]
机构
[1] Iowa State Univ, Literacy, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[2] Iowa State Univ, Online Literacy Coaching Certificate, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[3] Anderson Univ, English & Literacy, Anderson, SC USA
[4] Clemson Univ, Clemson, SC USA
关键词
argument; multimodal; multiliteracies; formative experiment; TOULMINS MODEL; LITERACY; TECHNOLOGIES; CLASSROOMS; STUDENTS; ENGLISH; DEFENSE; ACCOUNT; IMPACT; TEXTS;
D O I
10.1177/1086296X17700456
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
We conducted a formative experiment investigating how an intervention that engaged students in constructing multimodal arguments could be integrated into high school English instruction to improve students' argumentative writing. The intervention entailed three essential components: (a) construction of arguments defined as claims, evidence, and warrants; (b) digital tools that enabled the construction of multimodal arguments; and (c) a process approach to writing. The intervention was implemented for 11 weeks in high school English classrooms. Data included classroom observations; interviews with the teacher, students, and administrators; student reflections; and the products students created. These data, analyzed using grounded-theory coding and constant-comparison analysis, informed iterative modifications of the intervention. A retrospective analysis led to several assertions contributing to an emerging pedagogical theory that may guide efforts to promote high school students' ability to construct arguments using digital tools.
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 209
页数:29
相关论文
共 79 条
[1]   In defence of multimodal re-signification: a response to Havard Skaar's 'In defence of writing' [J].
Adami, Elisabetta .
LITERACY, 2011, 45 (01) :44-50
[2]   English as a Second Language Learners' Exploration of Multimodal Texts in a Junior High School [J].
Ajayi, Lasisi .
JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT & ADULT LITERACY, 2009, 52 (07) :585-595
[3]   Why bother theorizing adolescents' online literacies for classroom practice and research? [J].
Alvermann, Donna E. .
JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT & ADULT LITERACY, 2008, 52 (01) :8-19
[4]   Reconceiving argument [J].
Andrews, R .
EDUCATIONAL REVIEW, 1997, 49 (03) :259-269
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1986, NAT C RES ENGL
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2008, NCTE DEF 21 CENT LIT
[7]  
Applebee A.N., 2013, Writing instruction that works: Proven methods for middle and high school classrooms
[8]   The 'digital natives' debate: A critical review of the evidence [J].
Bennett, Sue ;
Maton, Karl ;
Kervin, Lisa .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 39 (05) :775-786
[9]   Writing in Multimodal texts - A social semiotic account of designs for learning [J].
Bezerner, Jeff ;
Kress, Gunther .
WRITTEN COMMUNICATION, 2008, 25 (02) :166-195
[10]  
Birdsell DavidS., 2004, Visual Rhetoric in a Digital World, P309