Evaluating Harms in the Assessment of Net Benefit: A Framework for Newborn Screening Condition Review

被引:33
作者
Goldenberg, Aaron J. [1 ]
Comeau, Anne Marie [2 ]
Grosse, Scott D. [3 ]
Tanksley, Susan [4 ]
Prosser, Lisa A. [5 ,6 ]
Ojodu, Jelili [7 ]
Botkin, Jeffrey R. [8 ]
Kemper, Alex R. [9 ]
Green, Nancy S. [10 ]
机构
[1] Case Western Reserve Univ, Sch Med, Dept Bioeth, 10900 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[2] Univ Massachusetts, Sch Med, New England Newborn Screening Program, 305 South St, Jamaica Plain, MA 02130 USA
[3] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Natl Ctr Birth Defects & Dev Disabil, 4770 Buford Highway, Atlanta, GA 30341 USA
[4] State Hlth Serv, Texas Dept, Newborn Screening Lab, Lab Serv Sect, POB 149347,MC 1947, Austin, TX 78714 USA
[5] Univ Michigan, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, CHEAR Unit, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[6] Univ Michigan Hlth Syst, SPH CHEAR Unit, Pediat, Hlth Management & Policy, 300 N Ingalls St,Rm 6E14,SPC 5456, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[7] Assoc Publ Hlth Labs, 8515 Georgia Ave,Suite 700, Silver Spring, MD 20910 USA
[8] Univ Utah, Dept Pediat, 75 South 2000 East 108, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[9] Duke Univ, Duke Clin Res Inst, Dept Pediat, 2400 Pratt St Rm 0311,Terrace Level,NP, Durham, NC 27705 USA
[10] Columbia Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Pediat, 630 West 168 St,Black Bldg 2-241,Box 168, New York, NY 10032 USA
关键词
Harms; Burdens; Newborn screening; Net benefit; False positive; ADVISORY-COMMITTEE; KRABBE-DISEASE; HEALTH-CARE; CANCER; CHALLENGES; DISORDERS; PARENTS; UPDATE; IMPACT; NEED;
D O I
10.1007/s10995-015-1869-9
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children ("Advisory Committee'') makes recommendations to the HHS Secretary regarding addition of new conditions to the national Recommended Uniform Screening Panel for newborns. The Advisory Committee's decision-making process includes assessing the net benefit of screening for nominated conditions, informed by systematic evidence reviews generated by an independent Condition Review Workgroup. The evidence base regarding harms associated with screening for specific conditions is often more limited than that for benefits. Procedures The process for defining potential harms from newborn screening reviewed the frameworks from other public health evidence-based review processes, adapted to newborn screening by experts in systematic review, newborn screening programs and bioethics, with input from and approval by the Advisory Committee. Main findings To support the Advisory Committee's review of nominated conditions, the Workgroup has developed a standardized approach to evaluation of harms and relevant gaps in the evidence. Types of harms include the physical burden to infants; psychosocial and logistic burdens to families from screening or diagnostic evaluation; increased risk of medical treatment for infants diagnosed earlier than children with clinical presentation; delayed diagnosis from false negative results; psychosocial harm from false positive results; uncertainty of clinical diagnosis, age of onset or clinical spectrum; and disparities in access to diagnosis or therapy. Conclusions Estimating the numbers of children at risk, the magnitude, timing and likelihood of harms will be integrated into Workgroup reports to the Advisory Committee.
引用
收藏
页码:693 / 700
页数:8
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Methods for developing evidence-based recommendations by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) [J].
Ahmed, Faruque ;
Temte, Jonathan L. ;
Campos-Outcalt, Doug ;
Schuenemann, Holger J. .
VACCINE, 2011, 29 (49) :9171-9176
[2]   Supporting Family Adaptation to Presymptomatic and Untreatable Conditions in an Era of Expanded Newborn Screening [J].
Bailey, Donald B., Jr. ;
Armstrong, F. Daniel ;
Kemper, Alex R. ;
Skinner, Debra ;
Warren, Steven F. .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 34 (06) :648-661
[3]  
Baily MA, 2008, HASTINGS CENT REP, V38, P23
[4]   Newborn screening technology: Proceed with caution [J].
Botkin, JR ;
Clayton, EW ;
Fost, NC ;
Burke, W ;
Murray, TH ;
Baily, MA ;
Wilfond, B ;
Berg, A ;
Ross, LF .
PEDIATRICS, 2006, 117 (05) :1793-1799
[5]   Universal State Newborn Screening Programs Can Reduce Health Disparities [J].
Brosco, Jeffrey P. ;
Grosse, Scott D. ;
Ross, Lainie Friedman .
JAMA PEDIATRICS, 2015, 169 (01) :7-8
[6]   Committee report: Method for evaluating conditions nominated for population-based screening of newborns and children [J].
Calonge, Ned ;
Green, Nancy S. ;
Rinaldo, Piero ;
Lloyd-Puryear, Michele ;
Dougherty, Denise ;
Boyle, Coleen ;
Watson, Michael ;
Trotter, Tracy ;
Terry, Sharon F. ;
Howell, R. Rodney .
GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2010, 12 (03) :153-159
[7]   Challenges in systematic reviews that assess treatment harms [J].
Chou, R ;
Helfand, M .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2005, 142 (12) :1090-1099
[8]   The false-positive in universal newborn hearing screening [J].
Clemens, CJ ;
Davis, SA ;
Bailey, AR .
PEDIATRICS, 2000, 106 (01) :E7
[9]   Balancing benefits and harms in health care - We need to get better ividence about harms [J].
Cuervo, LG ;
Clarke, M .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 327 (7406) :65-66
[10]   Developmental and Functional Outcomes in Children with a Positive Newborn Screen for Krabbe Disease: A Pilot Study of a Phone-Based Interview Surveillance Technique [J].
Duffner, Patricia K. ;
Granger, Carl ;
Lyon, Nancy ;
Niewczyk, Paulette ;
Barczykowski, Amy ;
Bauer, Sarah ;
Msall, Michael E. .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2012, 161 (02) :258-+