Environmental Design Guidelines for Circular Building Components: The Case of the Circular Building Structure

被引:32
作者
Eberhardt, Leonora Charlotte Malabi [1 ]
van Stijn, Anne [2 ]
Stranddorf, Liv Kristensen [3 ]
Birkved, Morten [4 ]
Birgisdottir, Harpa [1 ]
机构
[1] Aalborg Univ, Dept Built Environm, DK-2450 Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Architecture & Built Environm, Dept Management Built Environm, NL-2628 BL Delft, Netherlands
[3] Tech Univ Denmark, Dept Civil Engn, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark
[4] Univ Southern Denmark, SDU Life Cycle Engn, Dept Chem Engn Biotechnol & Environm Technol, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark
关键词
circular economy (CE); life cycle assessment (LCA); material flow analysis (MFA) design guidelines; buildings; structure; BUILT ENVIRONMENT; ECONOMY; STRATEGIES; LCA; DECONSTRUCTION; COMBINATIONS; CHALLENGES; MITIGATION; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.3390/su13105621
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Transitioning to a circular built environment can reduce the environmental impacts, resource consumption and waste generation emanating from buildings. However, there are many options to design circular building components, and limited knowledge on which options lead to the best environmental performance. Few guidelines exist and they build on conventional environmental performance assessments that focus on single life cycles, whereas the circular economy (CE) focuses on a sequence of multiple use- and life cycles. In this article, environmental design guidelines for circular building components were developed in five steps. First, examples of circular variants of a building structure were synthesized. Second, the environmental performance of these variants was compared with a business-as-usual variant through Life Cycle Assessments (LCA) and Material Flow Analysis (MFA) respectively. Circular parameters of these variants were tested using a scenario-specific approach. Third, from 24 LCAs and MFAs, a scorecard, rules-of-thumb and nine environmental design guidelines for designing circular building components were developed that provide guidance on which circular pathways and variants lead to the best environmental performance. For components with a long functional-technical lifespan, the following are promoted: resource efficiency, longer use through adaptable design, low-impact biomaterials and facilitating multiple cycles after and of use. Fourth, the design guidelines were evaluated by 49 experts from academia, industry and government in seven expert sessions. Further research is needed to validate the generalizability of the design guidelines. However, this research makes an important step in supporting the development of circular building components and, subsequently, the transition to a circular built environment.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]  
Aagaard N.J., 2013, Levetider af Bygningsdele ved Vurdering af Bredygtighed og Totalkonomi
[2]  
Agency I.E., 2019, GLOBAL STATUS REPORT
[3]   Recent developments, future challenges and new research directions in LCA of buildings: A critical review [J].
Anand, Chirjiv Kaur ;
Amor, Ben .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 67 :408-416
[4]   Comparison of GHG emissions from circular and conventional building components [J].
Andersen, Camilla Ernst ;
Kanafani, Kai ;
Zimmermann, Regitze Kjaer ;
Rasmussen, Freja Nygaard ;
Birgisdottir, Harpa .
BUILDINGS & CITIES, 2020, 1 (01) :379-392
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2008, ISO 14040
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2011, EN15978 EUR COMM STA
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2010, 219311 ISO
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2006, ENV MAN LIF CYCL ASS
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2019, The Circularity Gap Report 2019
[10]  
Birgisdottir H., 2019, DIALOGVAERKTOJ CIRKU