Further Evidence for the Expansion of Adult Cochlear Implant Candidacy Criteria

被引:31
作者
Perkins, Elizabeth [1 ]
Dietrich, Mary S. [1 ]
Manzoor, Nauman [1 ]
O'Malley, Matthew [1 ]
Bennett, Marc [1 ]
Rivas, Alejandro [1 ]
Haynes, David [1 ]
Labadie, Robert [1 ]
Gifford, Rene [1 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Med Ctr, Nashville, TN USA
关键词
CNC word scores; Cochlear implant; Expanding indications; SPEECH-PERCEPTION; CLINICAL-TRIAL; HEARING-LOSS; DEAF; RECOGNITION; PERFORMANCE; COGNITION; SYSTEM; EASE;
D O I
10.1097/MAO.0000000000003068
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: 1) To complete a follow-up investigation of postoperative outcomes for adult cochlear implant (CI) recipients scoring >= 30% Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant (CNC) preoperatively, and 2) to describe the postoperative performance trajectory for this group of higher performing patients. Study Design: Retrospective chart review. Setting: Tertiary referral center. Patients: One hundred four (105 ears) postlingually deafened adults who scored >= 30% CNC word recognition in the ear to be implanted preoperatively. Interventions: One hundred four subjects underwent cochlear implantation. Main Outcome Measures: Pre- and postoperative CNC word scores and AzBio sentences in quiet and noise in the ear to be implanted as well as the bilateral-aided condition pre-CI and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-CI. Results: Statistically significant improvement was demonstrated for CNC and AzBio sentences in quiet and noise for the CI alone and bilateral listening conditions. Most improvement was demonstrated by 6-months postoperatively (p < 0.001) with the exception of AzBio sentences in noise demonstrating improvement within 3 months (p < 0.001). For patients with preop CNC scores up to 40% (n = 57), all recipients demonstrated either equivocal (n = 17) or statistically significant improvement (n = 40) for CNC word recognition in the CI-alone condition and none demonstrated a significant decrement in the bilateral condition. For patients with preop CNC scores >40% (n = 47, 48 ears), 89.3% (42 patients) demonstrated either equivocal (n = 24, 50%) or statistically significant improvement (n = 19, 39.6%) for CNC word recognition in the CI-only condition and none demonstrated a significant decrement in the bilateral condition. Conclusions: CI candidates with preoperative CNC word scores higher than conventional CI recipients derive statistically significant benefit from cochlear implantation for both the CI ear and best-aided condition. These data provide further support for the expansion of adult CI candidacy up to at least 40% CNC word recognition preoperatively with consideration given to further expansion possibly up to 60%.
引用
收藏
页码:815 / 823
页数:9
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Effect of Preoperative Residual Hearing on Speech Perception After Cochlear Implantation [J].
Adunka, Oliver F. ;
Buss, Emily ;
Clark, Marcia S. ;
Pillsbury, Harold C. ;
Buchman, Craig A. .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 2008, 118 (11) :2044-2049
[2]   Nucleus Freedom North American clinical trial [J].
Balkany, Thomas ;
Hodges, Annelle ;
Menapace, Christine ;
Hazard, Linda ;
Driscoll, Colin ;
Gantz, Bruce ;
Kelsall, David ;
Luxford, William ;
McMenomy, Sean ;
Neely, J. Gail ;
Peters, Brian ;
Pillsbury, Harold ;
Roberson, Joseph ;
Schramm, David ;
Telian, Steven ;
Waltzman, Susan ;
Westerberg, Brian ;
Payne, Stacy .
OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2007, 136 (05) :757-762
[3]   Factors Affecting Auditory Performance of Postlinguistically Deaf Adults Using Cochlear Implants: An Update with 2251 Patients [J].
Blamey, Peter ;
Artieres, Franoise ;
Baskent, Deniz ;
Bergeron, Francois ;
Beynon, Andy ;
Burke, Elaine ;
Dillier, Norbert ;
Dowell, Richard ;
Fraysse, Bernard ;
Gallego, Stephane ;
Govaerts, Paul J. ;
Green, Kevin ;
Huber, Alexander M. ;
Kleine-Punte, Andrea ;
Maat, Bert ;
Marx, Mathieu ;
Mawman, Deborah ;
Mosnier, Isabelle ;
O'Connor, Alec Fitzgerald ;
O'Leary, Stephen ;
Rousset, Alexandra ;
Schauwers, Karen ;
Skarzynski, Henryk ;
Skarzynski, Piotr H. ;
Sterkers, Olivier ;
Terranti, Assia ;
Truy, Eric ;
Van de Heyning, Paul ;
Venail, Frederic ;
Vincent, Christophe ;
Lazard, Diane S. .
AUDIOLOGY AND NEURO-OTOLOGY, 2013, 18 (01) :36-47
[4]   Cochlear implant outcomes in the elderly [J].
Chatelin, V ;
Kim, EJ ;
Driscoll, C ;
Larky, J ;
Polite, C ;
Price, L ;
Lalwani, AK .
OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2004, 25 (03) :298-301
[5]  
Etymotic Research Inc, 2005, BKB SIN TEST
[6]   Recognition of speech presented at soft to loud levels by adult cochlear implant recipients of three cochlear implant systems [J].
Firszt, JB ;
Holden, LK ;
Skinner, MW ;
Tobey, EA ;
Peterson, A ;
Gaggl, W ;
Runge-Samuelson, CL ;
Wackym, PA .
EAR AND HEARING, 2004, 25 (04) :375-387
[7]   Speech recognition materials and ceiling effects: Considerations for cochlear implant programs [J].
Gifford, Rene H. ;
Shallop, Jon K. ;
Peterson, Anna Mary .
AUDIOLOGY AND NEURO-OTOLOGY, 2008, 13 (03) :193-205
[8]   Evidence for the Expansion of Adult Cochlear Implant Candidacy [J].
Gifford, Rene H. ;
Dorman, Michael F. ;
Shallop, Jon K. ;
Sydlowski, Sarah A. .
EAR AND HEARING, 2010, 31 (02) :186-194
[9]   Prevalence of Hearing Loss by Severity in the United States [J].
Goman, Adele M. ;
Lin, Frank R. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2016, 106 (10) :1820-1822
[10]   The Effect of Hearing Loss and Hearing Aids on the Use of Information and Communication Technologies by Community-Living Older Adults [J].
Gonsalves, Chris ;
Pichora-Fuller, Margaret Kathleen .
CANADIAN JOURNAL ON AGING-REVUE CANADIENNE DU VIEILLISSEMENT, 2008, 27 (02) :145-157