Seismic performance evaluation of steel arch bridges against major earthquakes. Part 2: Simplified verification procedure

被引:14
作者
Lu, ZH [1 ]
Usami, T [1 ]
Ge, HB [1 ]
机构
[1] Nagoya Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Chikusa Ku, Nagoya, Aichi 4648603, Japan
关键词
seismic verification procedure; seismic performance; steel arch bridge; capacity; demand; pushover analyses; ESDOF;
D O I
10.1002/eqe.406
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The performance-based philosophy has been accepted as a more reasonable design concept for engineering structures. For this purpose, capacity evaluation and demand prediction procedures for civil engineering structures under earthquake excitations are of great significance. This work presents a displacement-based seismic performance verification procedure including capacity and seismic demand predictions for steel arch bridges and investigates its applicability. Pushover analyses is employed as a basis in this method to investigate the structure's behaviors. A failure criterion for steel members accounting for the effect of local buckling is involved and an equivalent single-degree-of-freedorn (ESDOF) system with a simplified bilinear hysteretic model formulated using pushover analyses results is introduced to estimate the displacement capacity and maximum demand of steel arch bridges under major earthquakes. To check the accuracy of the proposed method, seismic capacities and demands from inulti-degree-of-freedom (MDOF) time-history analyses with Level-II design earthquake record inputs modeling major earthquakes are used as benchmarks for comparison. By a case Study, it is clarified that the proposed prediction procedure can give accurate estimations of displacernent capacities and demands of the steel arch bridge in the transverse direction, while insufficient for the longitudinal direction, which confirms the conclusion drawn in other structure types about the applicability of pushover analyses. Copyright (C) 2004 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1355 / 1372
页数:18
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2002, SPEC HIGHW BRIDG
[2]   Seismic performance and retrofit evaluation of reinforced concrete structures [J].
Bracci, JM ;
Kunnath, SK ;
Reinhorn, AM .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1997, 123 (01) :3-10
[3]   Evaluation of modal pushover analysis using generic frames [J].
Chintanapakdee, C ;
Chopra, AK .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2003, 32 (03) :417-442
[4]   A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings [J].
Chopra, AK ;
Goel, RK .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2002, 31 (03) :561-582
[5]   Statistics of single-degree-of-freedom estimate of displacement for pushover analysis of buildings [J].
Chopra, AK ;
Goel, RK ;
Chintanapakdee, C .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 2003, 129 (04) :459-469
[6]  
Fajfar P, 1996, EARTHQUAKE ENG STRUC, V25, P31, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199601)25:1<31::AID-EQE534>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-V
[8]  
Japan Road Association (JRA), 1996, SPEC HIGHW BRIDG 5
[9]  
Kono T., 2003, P 6 S DUCT DES METH, P323
[10]   Pros and cons of a pushover analysis of seismic performance evaluation [J].
Krawinkler, H ;
Seneviratna, GDPK .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 1998, 20 (4-6) :452-464