Contrast-detail characteristic evaluations of several display devices

被引:15
|
作者
Wang, JH [1 ]
Anderson, J [1 ]
Lane, T [1 ]
Stetson, C [1 ]
Moore, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas, SW Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Dallas, TX 75235 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1007/BF03167651
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The contrast-detail characteristic of a display system is a powerful tool for evaluating displayed image quality. It takes into account the physical properties of the display, the psychophysical aspects of the observer, and the viewing conditions. It is a more sensitive measurement of the displayed image quality than a simple Society of Motion Picture and Television (SMPTE) pattern. Yet, it is relatively simple to measure and requires no special equipment or analysis tools. In this presentation, the results of the evaluation of several cathode ray tube (CRT) monitors and a digital projector will be presented. Contrast-detail characteristics of these display devices were measured under various gamma and display settings. The results show excellent intraobserver and interobserver variance (<1 step on the grayscale). Extraneous light, such as room lighting, affects the contrast threshold more severely at low background levels more than at high background. Gamma settings on graphics adapters affect the shapes of the contrast-detail curve for all display types. Gamma settings of approximately 2.0 result in a better contrast threshold for both high and low background brightness. The results show complex differences in contrast-detail characteristics for different display types. The digital projector display not only has significantly worse performance than CRT monitors, but also is affected more by extraneous light. High-brightness monitors with optimal monitor and graphics adapter settings have better performance than color or low-brightness monitors. However, under some settings, the performance of high-brightness monitors is not always better at all object sizes and background levels. Copyright (C) 2000 by W.B. Saunders Company.
引用
收藏
页码:162 / 167
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] AN EMPIRICAL-INVESTIGATION OF VARIABILITY IN CONTRAST-DETAIL DIAGRAM MEASUREMENTS
    LOO, LND
    DOI, K
    ISHIDA, M
    METZ, CE
    CHAN, HP
    HIGASHIDA, Y
    KODERA, Y
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE SOCIETY OF PHOTO-OPTICAL INSTRUMENTATION ENGINEERS, 1983, 419 : 68 - 76
  • [32] Theoretic model for contrast-detail detectability prediction in digital mammography
    Liu, H
    Fajardo, LL
    Chen, J
    Baxter, R
    RADIOLOGY, 1996, 201 : 348 - 348
  • [33] A CLINICAL-EVALUATION OF CONTRAST-DETAIL ANALYSIS FOR ULTRASOUND IMAGES
    LOPEZ, H
    LOEW, MH
    BUTLER, PF
    HILL, MC
    ALLMAN, RM
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1990, 17 (01) : 48 - 57
  • [34] Characterizing atherosclerotic plaque with Computed Tomography: a Contrast-Detail study
    Kasraie, Nima
    Clarke, Geoffrey David
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2012: IMAGE PERCEPTION, OBSERVER PERFORMANCE, AND TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2012, 8318
  • [35] BEAM ENERGY EFFECTS ON CONTRAST-DETAIL MEASUREMENTS IN CT SCANNERS
    COHEN, G
    WAGNER, LK
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1981, 5 (06) : 944 - 944
  • [36] LOW CONTRAST DETECTABILITY AND CONTRAST-DETAIL ANALYSIS IN ULTRASOUND B-SCANS
    WAGNER, RF
    SMITH, SW
    SANDRIK, JM
    LOPEZ, H
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1981, 8 (05) : 740 - 740
  • [37] CONTRAST-DETAIL ANALYSIS OF IMAGE DEGRADATION DUE TO LOSSY COMPRESSION
    COOK, LT
    INSANA, MF
    MCFADDEN, MA
    HALL, TJ
    COX, GG
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1995, 22 (06) : 715 - 721
  • [38] Factors Affecting Contrast-Detail Performance in Computed Tomography: A Review
    Alsleem, Haney
    Davidson, Robert
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION SCIENCES, 2013, 44 (02) : 62 - 70
  • [39] A theoretical model for contrast-detail detectability prediction in digital radiography
    Liu, H
    Fajardo, LL
    Baxter, R
    BIOMEDICAL SENSING, IMAGING, AND TRACKING TECHNOLOGIES I, 1996, 2676 : 116 - 121
  • [40] Contrast-detail analysis of the effect of image compression on computed tomographic images
    Cook, LT
    Cox, GG
    Insana, MF
    McFadden, MA
    Hall, TJ
    Gaborski, RS
    Lure, FYM
    IMAGE PERCEPTION - MEDICAL IMAGING 1996, 1996, 2712 : 128 - 137