Inference for the cost-effectiveness acceptability curve and cost-effectiveness ratio

被引:58
作者
O'Hagan, A
Stevens, JW
Montmartin, J
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, Stat Serv Unit, Sheffield S3 7RH, S Yorkshire, England
[2] Astra Charnwood, Loughborough, Leics, England
关键词
D O I
10.2165/00019053-200017040-00004
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The aim of this article is to consider Bayesian and frequentist inference methods for measures of incremental cost effectiveness in data obtained via a clinical trial. The most useful measure is the cost-effectiveness (C/E) acceptability curve. Recent publications on Bayesian estimation have assumed a normal posterior distribution, which ignores uncertainty in estimated variances; and suggest unnecessarily complicated methods of computation. We present a simple Bayesian computation for the C/E acceptability curve and a simple frequentist analogue. Our approach takes account of errors in estimated variances, resulting in calculations that are based on distributions rather than normal distributions. If inference is required about the C/E ratio, we argue that the standard frequentist procedures give unreliable or misleading inferences, and present instead a Bayesian interval.
引用
收藏
页码:339 / 349
页数:11
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
Bala MV, 1999, DRUG INF J, V33, P841, DOI 10.1177/009286159903300325
[2]   THE CE PLANE - A GRAPHIC REPRESENTATION OF COST-EFFECTIVENESS [J].
BLACK, WC .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1990, 10 (03) :212-214
[3]  
Briggs A, 1998, HEALTH ECON, V7, P723, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199812)7:8<723::AID-HEC392>3.3.CO
[4]  
2-F
[5]  
Briggs AH, 1999, HEALTH ECON, V8, P257, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199905)8:3<257::AID-HEC427>3.0.CO
[6]  
2-E
[7]   NOTE ON A CONDITIONAL PROPERTY OF STUDENTS [J].
BUEHLER, RJ ;
FEDDERSEN, AP .
ANNALS OF MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS, 1963, 34 (03) :1098-&
[8]   Statistical analysis in pharmacoeconomic studies - A review of current issues and standards [J].
Coyle, D .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 1996, 9 (06) :506-516
[9]  
DARBY SC, 1980, BIOMETRIKA, V67, P607
[10]  
Drummond M, 1993, Health Econ, V2, P205, DOI 10.1002/hec.4730020303