Among women undergoing embryo transfer, is the probability of pregnancy and live birth improved with ultrasound guidance over clinical touch alone? A systemic review and meta-analysis of prospective randomized trials

被引:55
作者
Abou-Setta, Ahmed M. [1 ]
Mansour, Ragaa T. [1 ]
Al-Inany, Hesham G. [1 ]
Aboulghar, Mona M. [1 ]
Aboulghar, Mohamed A. [1 ]
Serour, Gamal I. [1 ]
机构
[1] Egyptian IVF ET Ctr, Cairo, Egypt
关键词
ultrasound-guided ET; clinical touch ET; meta-analysis; in vitro fertilization;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.11.161
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To investigate the theory that ultrasound guidance during ET improves clinical outcomes. Design: Systematic review of prospective, randomized, controlled trials comparing ultrasound with clinical touch methods of embryo catheter guidance. Setting: Infertility centers. Patient(s): 5,968 ET cycles in women. Intervention(S): Embryo transfer with or without ultrasound guidance. Main Outcome Measure(s): Meticulous electronic (e.g., PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL) and hand searches were performed to locate trials. Primary outcome measures were the live-birth, ongoing pregnancy, and clinical pregnancy rates. Secondary outcome measures were the implantation, multiple pregnancies, and miscarriage rates. In addition, the incidences of ectopic pregnancies and difficult transfers were evaluated. Result(s): Twenty-five studies were retrieved, of which five were excluded. Meta-analysis of the remaining studies (5,968 ET cycles in women) was conducted by using the Mantel-Haenszel method (fixed-effect model). There was a significantly increased chance of a live birth (odds ratio [OR] = 1.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.19 to 2.67), ongoing pregnancy (OR = 1.51, 95% CI = 1.31 to 1.74), clinical pregnancy (OR = 1.50, 95% CI = 1.34 to 1.67), embryo implantation (OR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.22 to 1.50), and easy transfer rates after ultrasound guidance (OR = 0,68, 95% CI = 0.58 to 0.81). There was no difference in multiple pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy, or miscarriage rates. Conclusion(s): Ultrasound-guided ET significantly increases the chance of live birth and ongoing and clinical pregnancy rates compared with the clinical touch method.
引用
收藏
页码:333 / 341
页数:9
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   The effect of ultrasound (US) guided embryo transfer (ET) and the choice of catheter on the outcome of IVF [J].
Abdelmassih, VG ;
Abdelmassih, ST ;
Nagy, ZP ;
Abdelmassih, R ;
Balmaceda, J .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2001, 76 (03) :S88-S89
[2]   Firm embryo transfer catheters for assisted reproduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis using direct and adjusted indirect comparisons [J].
Abou-Setta, AM .
REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2006, 12 (02) :191-198
[3]   Soft versus firm embryo transfer catheters for assisted reproduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Abou-Setta, AM ;
Al-Inany, HG ;
Mansour, RT ;
Serour, GI ;
Aboulghar, MA .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2005, 20 (11) :3114-3121
[4]  
ALINANY HG, 2006, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, V1
[5]   TRANSFER OF EMBRYOS INTO THE UTERUS - HOW MUCH DO TECHNICAL FACTORS AFFECT PREGNANCY RATES [J].
ALSHAWAF, T ;
DAVE, R ;
HARPER, J ;
LINEHAN, D ;
RILEY, P ;
CRAFT, I .
JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 1993, 10 (01) :31-36
[6]   Three-dimensional ultrasound in embryo transfer [J].
Baba, K ;
Ishihara, O ;
Hayashi, N ;
Saitoh, M ;
Taya, J ;
Kinoshita, K .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 16 (04) :372-373
[7]  
Bar-Hava I, 2003, HUM REPROD, V18, P7
[8]   A meta-analysis of ultrasound-guided versus clinical touch embryo transfer [J].
Buckett, WM .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2003, 80 (04) :1037-1041
[9]   Embryo transfer under ultrasound guidance improves pregnancy rates after in-vitro fertilization [J].
Coroleu, B ;
Carreras, O ;
Veiga, A ;
Martell, A ;
Martinez, F ;
Belil, I ;
Hereter, L ;
Barri, PN .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2000, 15 (03) :616-620
[10]   The usefulness of ultrasound guidance in frozen-thawed embryo transfer:: a prospective randomized clinical trial [J].
Coroleu, B ;
Barri, PN ;
Carreras, O ;
Martínez, F ;
Veiga, A ;
Balasch, J .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2002, 17 (11) :2885-2890