CT-Guided intervention with low radiation dose: Feasibility and experience

被引:31
作者
Lucey, Brian C.
Varghese, Jose C.
Hochberg, Aaron
Blake, Michael A.
Soto, Jorge A.
机构
[1] Boston Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Div Body Imaging, Boston, MA 02118 USA
[2] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, Div Abdominal Imaging, Boston, MA 02114 USA
关键词
biopsy; CT technique; interventional radiology; radiation dose;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.06.0378
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of performing CT-guided interventional procedures with a very low radiation dose. MATERIALS AND METHODS. We performed 291 CT-guided interventional procedures using a low dose of radiation. The subjects were 165 men and 126 women 22 - 89 years old with a mean age of 65 years. CT fluoroscopy was not used. The procedures were 201 percutaneous biopsies and 90 percutaneous aspiration or drainage procedures. Before the procedure, images were obtained with standard mAs of 175 - 250 mAs. All subsequent CT was performed at a reduced mAs. Technical success of catheter placement and biopsy was calculated, and the results were compared with those of procedures performed over the previous 12 months with standard radiation doses. Patient weight, lesion size, and number of CT acquisitions needed to complete the procedure were recorded. RESULTS. All but three aspiration or drainage procedures performed at 30 mAs were successful, for a success rate of 96.7%. The technical success rate of biopsy performed at 30 mAs was 93.5%. In the cases of 13 patients undergoing biopsy, the masses were not identified with low-dose technique, and these procedures were completed at a higher dose. Results were independent of patient weight and lesion size. The technical success rate was 98% for percutaneous drainage performed at a standard radiation dose in the 12 months before introduction of the low-dose technique. The technical success rate was 87.5% for biopsy performed at a standard radiation dose in the 12 months before introduction of the low-dose technique. The complication rate of the low-dose technique was comparable to that of the standard-dose technique. CONCLUSION. Low-dose radiation technique using 30 mAs results in technical success for both catheter placement and percutaneous biopsy comparable to standard radiation dose.
引用
收藏
页码:1187 / 1194
页数:8
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   Evaluation of patient and staff doses during various CT fluoroscopy guided interventions [J].
Buls, N ;
Pagés, J ;
de Mey, J ;
Osteaux, M .
HEALTH PHYSICS, 2003, 85 (02) :165-173
[2]   Feasibility of MDCT colonography in ultra-low-dose technique in the detection of colorectal lesions: Comparison with high-resolution video colonoscopy [J].
Cohnen, M ;
Vogt, C ;
Beck, A ;
Andersen, K ;
Heinen, W ;
vom Dahl, S ;
Aurich, V ;
Haeussinger, D ;
Moedder, U .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2004, 183 (05) :1355-1359
[3]   Impact of low-dose CT on lung cancer screening [J].
Diederich, S ;
Wormanns, D .
LUNG CANCER, 2004, 45 :S13-S19
[4]   Guidance of percutaneous pulmonary biopsies with real-time CT fluoroscopy [J].
Froelich, JJ ;
Ishaque, N ;
Regn, J ;
Saar, B ;
Walthers, EM ;
Klose, KJ .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2002, 42 (01) :74-79
[5]   Value of CT fluoroscopy for percutaneous biopsy procedures [J].
Gianfelice, D ;
Lepanto, L ;
Perreault, P ;
Chartrand-Lefebvre, C ;
Milette, PC .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2000, 11 (07) :879-884
[6]   Helical CT for nephrolithiasis and ureterolithiasis: Comparison of conventional and reduced radiation-dose techniques [J].
Heneghan, JP ;
McGuire, KA ;
Leder, RA ;
DeLong, DM ;
Yoshizumi, T ;
Nelson, RC .
RADIOLOGY, 2003, 229 (02) :575-580
[7]   Detection of urinary tract stones at low-radiation-dose CT with Z-axis automatic tube current modulation: Phantom and clinical studies [J].
Kalra, MK ;
Maher, MM ;
D'Souza, RV ;
Rizzo, S ;
Halpern, EF ;
Blake, MA ;
Saini, S .
RADIOLOGY, 2005, 235 (02) :523-529
[8]   Detection and characterization of lesions on low-radiation-dose abdominal CT images postprocessed with noise reduction filters [J].
Kalra, MK ;
Maher, MM ;
Blake, MA ;
Lucey, BC ;
Karau, K ;
Toth, TL ;
Avinash, G ;
Halpern, EF ;
Saini, S .
RADIOLOGY, 2004, 232 (03) :791-797
[9]  
Mettler Fred A. Jr., 2000, Journal of Radiological Protection, V20, P353, DOI 10.1088/0952-4746/20/4/301
[10]   CT fluoroscopy-guided interventional procedures: Techniques and radiation dose to radiologists [J].
Paulson, EK ;
Sheafor, DH ;
Enterline, DS ;
McAdams, HP ;
Yoshizumi, TT .
RADIOLOGY, 2001, 220 (01) :161-167