Patellar tendon or semitendinosus tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction -: A prospective, randomized study with a 7-year follow-up

被引:124
作者
Liden, Mattias [1 ]
Ejerhed, Lars
Sernert, Ninni
Laxdal, Gauti
Kartus, Juri
机构
[1] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Dept Plast Surg, SE-41345 Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Norra Alvsborg Cty Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Trollhattan, Sweden
[3] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, SE-41345 Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
anterior cruciate ligament; patellar tendon; semitendinosus; autograft; surgery; randomized; prospective;
D O I
10.1177/0363546506298275
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The aim of the study was to compare the results after arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using central-third bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) autografts and triple/quadruple semitendinosus (ST) autografts. Hypothesis: In the long-term, ACL reconstruction using BTB autografts will render more donor-site problems than ST autografts. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: A randomized series of 71 patients (22 women and 49 men) with a unilateral ACL rupture who underwent reconstructive surgery were included in the study. The BTB graft was used in 34 patients (BTB group) and the ST-tendon graft was used in 37 patients (ST group). The patients were examined a median of 86 months (range, 68 to 114 months) after the reconstruction. Results: Sixty-eight of 71 patients (96%) were examined at follow-up. The clinical assessments at follow-up revealed no significant differences between the BTB group and the ST group in terms of the Lysholm score, Tegner activity level, International Knee Documentation Committee evaluation system, 1-legged hop test, KT-1000 arthrometer laxity measurements, manual Lachman test, and range of motion. A significant improvement was seen in both groups compared with the preoperative values in terms of most clinical assessments. Donor-site morbidity in the form of knee-walking ability, kneeling ability, and area of disturbed anterior knee sensitivity revealed no significant differences between the groups. Conclusion: Seven years after ACL reconstruction, the subjective and objective outcomes were similar after using the central-third BTB autograft and triple/quadruple ST autograft. Furthermore, no difference in terms of donor-site morbidity was found between the 2 groups.
引用
收藏
页码:740 / 748
页数:9
相关论文
共 55 条
[31]   Anterior knee pain 7 years after an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft [J].
Järvelä, T ;
Kannus, P ;
Järvinen, M .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE & SCIENCE IN SPORTS, 2000, 10 (04) :221-227
[32]   Complications following arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction - A 2-5-year follow-up of 604 patients with special emphasis on anterior knee pain [J].
Kartus, J ;
Magnusson, L ;
Stener, S ;
Brandsson, S ;
Eriksson, BI ;
Karlsson, J .
KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 1999, 7 (01) :2-8
[33]   Factors affecting donor-site morbidity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts [J].
Kartus J. ;
Stener S. ;
Lindahl S. ;
Engström B. ;
Eriksson B.I. ;
Karlsson J. .
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 1997, 5 (4) :222-228
[34]   The localization of the infrapatellar nerves in the anterior knee region with special emphasis on central third patellar tendon harvest: A dissection study on cadaver and amputated specimens [J].
Kartus, J ;
Ejerhed, L ;
Eriksson, BI ;
Karlsson, J .
ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 1999, 15 (06) :577-586
[35]   Donor-site morbidity and anterior knee problems after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autografts [J].
Kartus, J ;
Movin, T ;
Karlsson, J .
ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2001, 17 (09) :971-980
[36]   Comparison of traditional and subcutaneous patellar tendon harvest - A prospective study of donor site-related problems after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using different graft harvesting techniques [J].
Kartus, J ;
Ejerhed, L ;
Sernert, N ;
Brandsson, S ;
Karlsson, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2000, 28 (03) :328-335
[37]   Is bracing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction necessary? A 2-year follow-up of 78 consecutive patients rehabilitated with or without a brace [J].
Kartus J. ;
Stener S. ;
Köhler K. ;
Sernert N. ;
Eriksson B.I. ;
Karlsson J. .
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 1997, 5 (3) :157-161
[38]   A BIOMECHANICAL COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT SURGICAL TECHNIQUES OF GRAFT FIXATION IN ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION [J].
KUROSAKA, M ;
YOSHIYA, S ;
ANDRISH, JT .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 1987, 15 (03) :225-229
[39]   A prospective randomized comparison of bone-patellar tendon-bone and hamstring grafts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction [J].
Laxdal, G ;
Kartus, J ;
Hansson, L ;
Heidvall, M ;
Ejerhed, L ;
Karlsson, J .
ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2005, 21 (01) :34-42
[40]   Structural properties of six tibial fixation methods for anterior cruciate ligament soft tissue grafts [J].
Magen, HE ;
Howell, SM ;
Hull, ML .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 1999, 27 (01) :35-43