Automated Machine Learning for High-Throughput Image-Based Plant Phenotyping

被引:57
|
作者
Koh, Joshua C. O. [1 ]
Spangenberg, German [2 ,3 ]
Kant, Surya [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Agr Victoria, Grains Innovat Pk,110 Natimuk Rd, Horsham, Vic 3400, Australia
[2] AgriBio, Agr Victoria, Ctr AgriBiosci, 5 Ring Rd, Bundoora, Vic 3083, Australia
[3] La Trobe Univ, Sch Appl Syst Biol, Bundoora, Vic 3083, Australia
[4] Univ Melbourne, Ctr Agr Innovat, Sch Agr & Food, Fac Vet & Agr Sci, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
关键词
automated machine learning; neural architecture search; high-throughput plant phenotyping; wheat lodging assessment; unmanned aerial vehicle; ARCHITECTURES; DEPTH; RGB;
D O I
10.3390/rs13050858
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Automated machine learning (AutoML) has been heralded as the next wave in artificial intelligence with its promise to deliver high-performance end-to-end machine learning pipelines with minimal effort from the user. However, despite AutoML showing great promise for computer vision tasks, to the best of our knowledge, no study has used AutoML for image-based plant phenotyping. To address this gap in knowledge, we examined the application of AutoML for image-based plant phenotyping using wheat lodging assessment with unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) imagery as an example. The performance of an open-source AutoML framework, AutoKeras, in image classification and regression tasks was compared to transfer learning using modern convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures. For image classification, which classified plot images as lodged or non-lodged, transfer learning with Xception and DenseNet-201 achieved the best classification accuracy of 93.2%, whereas AutoKeras had a 92.4% accuracy. For image regression, which predicted lodging scores from plot images, transfer learning with DenseNet-201 had the best performance (R-2 = 0.8303, root mean-squared error (RMSE) = 9.55, mean absolute error (MAE) = 7.03, mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) = 12.54%), followed closely by AutoKeras (R-2 = 0.8273, RMSE = 10.65, MAE = 8.24, MAPE = 13.87%). In both tasks, AutoKeras models had up to 40-fold faster inference times compared to the pretrained CNNs. AutoML has significant potential to enhance plant phenotyping capabilities applicable in crop breeding and precision agriculture.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 19
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Using Sensors and Unmanned Aircraft Systems for High-Throughput Phenotyping of Biomass in Perennial Ryegrass Breeding Trials
    Wang, Junping
    Badenhorst, Pieter
    Phelan, Andrew
    Pembleton, Luke
    Shi, Fan
    Cogan, Noel
    Spangenberg, German
    Smith, Kevin
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2019, 10
  • [42] Analysis of hyperspectral images for detection of drought stress and recovery in maize plants in a high-throughput phenotyping platform
    Asaari, Mohd Shahrimie Mohd
    Mertens, Stien
    Dhondt, Stijn
    Inze, Dirk
    Wuyts, Nathalie
    Scheunders, Paul
    COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2019, 162 : 749 - 758
  • [43] A view from above: can drones be used for image-based phenotyping in garden rose breeding?
    Borra-Serrano, I.
    Kemeltaeva, A.
    Van Laere, K.
    Lootens, P.
    Leus, L.
    XXXI INTERNATIONAL HORTICULTURAL CONGRESS, IHC2022: INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON INNOVATIONS IN ORNAMENTALS: FROM BREEDING TO MARKET, 2023, 1368 : 271 - 279
  • [44] A HIGH-THROUGHPUT PHENOTYPING PIPELINE FOR RAPID EVALUATION OF MORPHOLOGICAL AND PHYSIOLOGICAL CROP TRAITS ACROSS LARGE FIELDS
    Das, Sumanta
    Massey-Reed, Sean Reynolds
    Mahuika, Jenny
    Watson, James
    Cordova, Celso
    Otto, Loren
    Zhao, Yan
    Chapman, Scott
    George-Jaeggli, Barbara
    Jordan, David
    Hammer, Graeme L.
    Potgieter, Andries B.
    2022 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM (IGARSS 2022), 2022, : 7783 - 7786
  • [45] Combining self-organizing maps and biplot analysis to preselect maize phenotypic components based on UAV high-throughput phenotyping platform
    Han, Liang
    Yang, Guijun
    Dai, Huayang
    Yang, Hao
    Xu, Bo
    Li, Heli
    Long, Huiling
    Li, Zhenhai
    Yang, Xiaodong
    Zhao, Chunjiang
    PLANT METHODS, 2019, 15 (1)
  • [46] Automated machine learning for deep learning based malware detection
    Brown, Austin
    Gupta, Maanak
    Abdelsalam, Mahmoud
    COMPUTERS & SECURITY, 2024, 137
  • [47] Toward Automated Machine Learning-Based Hyperspectral Image Analysis in Crop Yield and Biomass Estimation
    Li, Kai-Yun
    Sampaio de Lima, Raul
    Burnside, Niall G.
    Vahtmaee, Ele
    Kutser, Tiit
    Sepp, Karli
    Cabral Pinheiro, Victor Henrique
    Yang, Ming-Der
    Vain, Ants
    Sepp, Kalev
    REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 14 (05)
  • [48] The Prediction of Recombination Hotspot Based on Automated Machine Learning
    Ye, Dong-Xin
    Yu, Jun-Wen
    Li, Rui
    Hao, Yu-Duo
    Wang, Tian-Yu
    Yang, Hui
    Ding, Hui
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2025, 437 (06)
  • [49] QUIC website fingerprinting based on automated machine learning
    Ha, Joonseo
    Roh, Heejun
    ICT EXPRESS, 2024, 10 (03): : 594 - 599
  • [50] High Throughput Field Phenotyping of Wheat Plant Height and Growth Rate in Field Plot Trials Using UAV Based Remote Sensing
    Holman, Fenner H.
    Riche, Andrew B.
    Michalski, Adam
    Castle, March
    Wooster, Martin J.
    Hawkesford, Malcolm J.
    REMOTE SENSING, 2016, 8 (12)