Stakeholder preference elicitation and modelling in multi-criteria decision analysis - A case study on urban water supply

被引:68
作者
Kodikara, P. N. [1 ]
Perera, B. J. C. [1 ]
Kularathna, M. D. U. P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Victoria Univ, Melbourne, Vic 8001, Australia
[2] Melbourne Water, Melbourne, Vic 3001, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Multiple criteria analysis; Stakeholder preference elicitation; Urban water supply systems; RESERVOIR SYSTEM; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; MANAGEMENT; ALLOCATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejor.2010.02.016
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Integration of multiple objectives to evaluate the alternative operating rules for urban water supply reservoir systems can be effectively accomplished by multi-criteria decision aid techniques, where preference elicitation and modelling plays an important role. This paper describes a preference elicitation and modelling procedure involving the multi-criteria outranking method PROMETHEE in evaluating these alternative operating rules. The Melbourne water supply system was considered as the case study. Eight performance measures (PMs) were identified under four main objectives to evaluate the system performance under alternative operating rules. Three major hypothetical stakeholder groups namely, resource managers, water users, and environmental interest groups were considered in decision-making. An interviewer-assisted questionnaire survey was used to derive the preference functions and weights of the PMs. The evaluation of alternative operating rules is not covered in this paper, rather an approach to elicit and model stakeholder preferences in decision-making is described. Crown Copyright (C) 2010 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:209 / 220
页数:12
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Case study:: Application of multicriteria decision making to urban water supply [J].
Abrishamchi, A ;
Ebrahimian, A ;
Tajrishi, M ;
Mariño, MA .
JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2005, 131 (04) :326-335
[2]   A critical review of multi-criteria decision making methods with special reference to forest management and planning [J].
Ananda, Jayanath ;
Herath, Gamini .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 68 (10) :2535-2548
[3]  
[Anonymous], REV INFORM RECHERCHE
[4]   HOW TO SELECT AND HOW TO RANK PROJECTS - THE PROMETHEE METHOD [J].
BRANS, JP ;
VINCKE, P ;
MARESCHAL, B .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1986, 24 (02) :228-238
[5]  
BRANS JP, 2005, STATE ART SURVEYS
[6]   CalSim:: Generalized model for reservoir system analysis [J].
Draper, AJ ;
Munévar, A ;
Arora, SK ;
Reyes, E ;
Parker, NL ;
Chung, FI ;
Peterson, LE .
JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2004, 130 (06) :480-489
[7]   Determining the weights of criteria in the ELECTRE type methods with a revised Simos' procedure [J].
Figueira, J ;
Roy, B .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2002, 139 (02) :317-326
[8]   CLINICAL DECISION-ANALYSIS [J].
FISCHHOFF, B .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1980, 28 (01) :28-43
[9]   2004 Julian Hinds water resources development award lecture [J].
Galloway, GE .
JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 2005, 131 (04) :251-252
[10]   Design and implementation of a group DSS for sustaining renewable energies exploitation [J].
Georgopoulou, E ;
Sarafidis, Y ;
Diakoulaki, D .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1998, 109 (02) :483-500