Potential impacts of the Emissions Reduction Fund on the Australian economy

被引:13
作者
Duy Nong [1 ]
Siriwardana, Mahinda [2 ]
机构
[1] Colorado State Univ, Dept Agr & Resource Econ, Ft Collins, CO 80526 USA
[2] Univ New England, UNE Business Sch, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Australia; Emissions Reduction Fund; Energy efficiency; Resource efficiency; Electricity generation sector; GTAP-E model; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; UNIFORM PRICE; AUCTIONS; MARKET; BEHAVIOR; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2018.06.023
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper examines the impacts of the Emissions Reduction Fund on the Australian economy. The GTAP-E model has been extended to allocate the subsidy directly to each eligible sector. The simulation of the subsidy policy has been supplemented by introducing an improvement of energy efficiency to non-agricultural sectors and of resource efficiency by using endowment factors in the agricultural sector. Results indicate that, with the current budget of A$2.55 billion, or US$1.86 billion (Scenario 1), Australia can only achieve the minimum cumulative emissions reduction target of 225 MtCO(2)-e during 2015-20. Australia needs a budget of US$2.08 billion (Scenario 2) to achieve the maximum cumulative emissions reduction target of 279 MtCO(2)-e. In both scenarios, the agricultural sector receives the highest payment from the Australian Federal Government under the subsidy programme, followed by the electricity generation sector. Under the scheme, Australia experiences only a mild contraction in the economy, with a reduction of real GDP by 037% and 0.55% in the two scenarios, respectively. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:387 / 398
页数:12
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   An Overview of the GTAP 9 Data Base [J].
Aguiar, Angel ;
Narayanan, Badri ;
McDougall, Robert .
JOURNAL OF GLOBAL ECONOMIC ANALYSIS, 2016, 1 (01) :181-208
[2]   The impact of increased efficiency in the industrial use of energy: A computable general equilibrium analysis for the United Kingdom [J].
Allan, Grant ;
Hanley, Nick ;
McGregor, Peter ;
Swales, Kim ;
Turner, Karen .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2007, 29 (04) :779-798
[3]   Experimental comparisons of auctions under single- and multi-unit demand [J].
Alsemgeest, P ;
Noussair, C ;
Olson, M .
ECONOMIC INQUIRY, 1998, 36 (01) :87-97
[4]  
[Anonymous], AUSTR ENERGY PROJECT
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2006, J ECON INTERACT COOR, DOI DOI 10.1007/S11403-006-0012-9
[6]  
[Anonymous], POP EST PROJ
[7]  
Arndt C, 1996, GTAP TECHNICAL PAPER, P2
[8]   Validating energy-oriented CGE models [J].
Beckman, Jayson ;
Hertel, Thomas ;
Tyner, Wallace .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2011, 33 (05) :799-806
[9]   A Uniform Price Auction for Conservation Easements in the Canadian Prairies [J].
Brown, Laura K. ;
Troutt, Elizabeth ;
Edwards, Cynthia ;
Gray, Brian ;
Hu, Wanjing .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2011, 50 (01) :49-60
[10]  
Burniaux J M, 2002, 16 GTAP PURD U