Sex life and sexual function in men and women before and after total disc replacement compared with posterior lumbar fusion

被引:52
作者
Berg, Svante [1 ]
Fritzell, Peter [2 ]
Tropp, Hans [3 ]
机构
[1] Lowenstromska Hosp, Stockholm Spine Ctr, SE-19489 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Falun Cent Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, S-79182 Falun, Sweden
[3] Linkoping Univ Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, S-58185 Linkoping, Sweden
关键词
Sex life; Sexual dysfunction; Retrograde ejaculation; Total disc replacement; Lumbar fusion; Low back pain; LOW-BACK-PAIN; INTERBODY FUSION; RETROGRADE EJACULATION; COMPLICATIONS; EXPOSURE; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.spinee.2009.08.454
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Sex life and sexual function maybe affected by low back pain (LBP). Sexual dysfunction after anterior lumbar fusion is reported in both men and women, but focus is mainly on impaired male biological function (retrograde ejaculation) as this may cause infertility. This has led to concern as to whether anterior surgery should be employed in men, at least in younger age groups. PURPOSE: To investigate how chronic low back pain (CLBP) of assumed discogenic origin affects sex life and sexual function in patients considered for surgical treatment, whether this is affected by surgical treatment (total disc replacement [TDR] or posterolateral fusion [PLF]/posterior lumbar interbody fusion [PLIF]), and if so, are there differences between the surgical procedures undertaken. STUDY DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial comparing TDR and instrumented lumbar spine fusion, performed either as a PLF or PLIF. PATIENT SAMPLE: One hundred fifty-two patients were included in this randomized controlled trial to compare the effect on CLBP of either TDR via an anterior retroperitoneal approach or instrumented posterior lumbar fusion, PLF or PLIF. OUTCOME MEASURES: Global assessment of back pain, back pain (visual analog scale [VAS] 0-100), function (Oswestry Disability Index [ODI] 0-100), quality of life (EQ5D [EuroQol] 0-1), and answers on specific sexual function. METHODS: Outcome was assessed using data from the Swedish Spine Register (SweSpine). In ODI, one question, ODI 8, reflects the impact of back pain on sex life. This question was analyzed separately. Patients also answered a gender-specific questionnaire preoperatively and at the 2-year follow-up to determine any sexual dysfunction regarding erection, orgasm, and ejaculation. Followup was at 1 and 2 years. RESULTS: Before surgery, 34% reported that their sex life caused some extra LBP, and an additional 30% that their sex life was severely restricted by LBP. After surgery, sex life improved in both groups, with a strong correlation to a reduction of LBP. The gender-specific questionnaire used to measure sexual function after 2 years revealed no negative effect of TDR or Fusion in men regarding erection or retrograde ejaculation. However, 26% of all men in the Fusion group, compared with 3% in the TDR group, reported postoperative deterioration in the ability to achieve orgasm, despite a reduction of LBP CONCLUSIONS: Impairment of sex life appears to be related to CLBP. An improvement in sex life after TDR or lumbar fusion was positively correlated to a reduction in LBP. Total disc replacement in this study, performed through an anterior retroperitoneal approach, was not associated with greater sexual dysfunction compared with instrumented lumbar fusion performed either as a PLF or as a PLIF. Sexual function, expressed as orgasm, deteriorated in men in the Fusion group postoperatively, in spite of this group reporting less LBP after 2 years. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:987 / 994
页数:8
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
BERG S, 2009, EUR SPINE J IN PRESS
[2]   Anterior retroperitoneal lumbosacral spine exposure: Operative technique and results [J].
Bianchi, C ;
Ballard, JL ;
Abou-Zamzam, AM ;
Teruya, TH ;
Abu-Assal, ML .
ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2003, 17 (02) :137-142
[3]   A prospective, randomized, multicenter food and drug administration Investigational device exemptions study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE™ artificial disc versus lumbar fusion Part I:: Evaluation of clinical outcomes [J].
Blumenthal, S ;
McAfee, PC ;
Guyer, RD ;
Hochschuler, SH ;
Geisler, FH ;
Holt, RT ;
Garcia, R ;
Regan, JJ ;
Ohnmeiss, DD .
SPINE, 2005, 30 (14) :1565-1575
[4]  
Brau Salvador A, 2002, Spine J, V2, P216, DOI 10.1016/S1529-9430(02)00184-5
[5]   Retrograde ejaculation after retroperitoneal lower lumbar interbody fusion [J].
Christensen, FB ;
Bunger, CE .
INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 1997, 21 (03) :176-180
[6]  
Duquesnoy B, 1998, REV RHUM, V65, P33
[7]   Video-assisted versus open anterior lumbar spine fusion surgery -: A comparison of four techniques and complications in 135 patients [J].
Escobar, E ;
Transfeldt, E ;
Garvey, T ;
Ogilvie, J ;
Graber, J ;
Schultz, L .
SPINE, 2003, 28 (07) :729-732
[8]  
Fairbank J C, 1980, Physiotherapy, V66, P271
[9]   2001 Volvo Award winner in clinical studies:: Lumbar fusion versus nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain -: A multicenter randomized controlled trial from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group [J].
Fritzell, P ;
Hägg, O ;
Wessberg, P ;
Nordwall, A .
SPINE, 2001, 26 (23) :2521-2532
[10]   Sexual function in men and women after anterior surgery for chronic low back pain [J].
Hagg, Olle ;
Fritzell, Peter ;
Nordwall, Anders .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2006, 15 (05) :677-682