The current status of research on the structure of evaluative space

被引:166
作者
Norris, Catherine J. [1 ]
Gollan, Jackie [2 ]
Berntson, Gary G. [3 ]
Cacioppo, John T. [4 ]
机构
[1] Dartmouth Coll, Hanover, NH 03755 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
[3] Ohio State Univ, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[4] Univ Chicago, Ctr Cognit & Social Neurosci, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
关键词
Positivity; Negativity; Depression; Ambivalence; EMOTIONAL FACIAL EXPRESSIONS; NUCLEUS-ACCUMBENS SHELL; FRONTAL EEG ASYMMETRY; NEURAL RESPONSES; MAJOR DEPRESSION; ATTENTIONAL BIAS; BRAIN ASYMMETRY; NEGATIVITY BIAS; ANTIDEPRESSANT TREATMENT; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES;
D O I
10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.03.011
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The structure of evaluative space shapes emotional life and must be capable of an astonishing range of emotional experience and expression. In this article, we outline the current status of research on the Evaluative Space Model (ESM; Cacioppo et al., 1997, 1999), which proposes that behavioral predispositions (e.g., approach, withdrawal) are the ultimate output of the affect system, which is defined by operating characteristics that differ for positivity and negativity, and across levels of the nervous system. First, we summarize the tenets of the model, as well as counterarguments raised by other theorists. To address these counterarguments, we discuss the postulates of affective oscillation and calibration, two features of the affect system proposed to underlie the durability and adaptability of affect. Finally, we consider the implications of disorder in the structure of evaluative space for the comprehension and treatment of depression and anxiety. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:422 / 436
页数:15
相关论文
共 146 条
[1]   The stability of resting frontal electroencephalographic asymmetry in depression [J].
Allen, JJB ;
Urry, HL ;
Hitt, SK ;
Coan, JA .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2004, 41 (02) :269-280
[2]   Suppression of the emotional Stroop effect by increased anxiety in patients with social phobia [J].
Amir, N ;
McNally, RJ ;
Riemann, BC ;
Burns, J ;
Lorenz, M ;
Mullen, JT .
BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 1996, 34 (11-12) :945-948
[3]  
[Anonymous], PSYCHOL REV, DOI DOI 10.1037/0033-295X.84.3.231
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1965, The expression of the emotions in man and animals
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1999, The Center for Research in Psychophysiology
[6]  
Baumeister R. F., 2001, Review of General Psychology, V5, P323, DOI [DOI 10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323, DOI 10.1037//1089-2680.5.4.323, 10.1037//1089-2680.5.4.323]
[7]  
Berntson GG, 2008, HANDBOOK OF APPROACH AND AVOIDANCE MOTIVATION, P307
[8]  
Berntson GG, 2003, EXPANDING THE BOUNDARIES OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL SCIENCES: CASE STUDIES IN INTERDISCIPLINARY INNOVATION, P18
[9]   NEUROBEHAVIORAL ORGANIZATION AND THE CARDINAL PRINCIPLE OF EVALUATIVE BIVALENCE [J].
BERNTSON, GG ;
BOYSEN, ST ;
CACIOPPO, JT .
BRAIN MECHANISMS: PAPERS IN MEMORY OF ROBERT THOMPSON, 1993, 702 :75-102
[10]  
Berntson GrayG., 2009, HDB NEUROSCIENCE BEH