The Cost-Effectiveness of Prostate Cancer Detection with the Use of Prostate Health Index

被引:41
作者
Heijnsdijk, Eveline A. M. [1 ]
Denham, Dwight [2 ]
de Koning, Harry J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus MC, Dept Publ Hlth, POB 2040, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Beckman Coulter Inc, Global Hlth Econ & Reimbursement, Brea, CA USA
关键词
cost-effectiveness; modeling; PHI; prostate cancer; PSA; screening; ROTTERDAM SECTION; FOLLOW-UP; ANTIGEN; OVERDETECTION; MORTALITY; NG/ML; ERSPC;
D O I
10.1016/j.jval.2015.12.002
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Background: Clinical trial results suggested that prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening can reduce prostate cancer mortality. Nevertheless, because the specificity of the PSA test for cancer detection is low, it leads to many negative biopsies. The Beckman Coulter Prostate Health Index (PHI) testing demonstrates improved specificity compared with the PSA-only screening and therefore may improve the cost-effectiveness of prostate cancer detection. Objective: To examine the cost-effectiveness of adding PHI testing to improve cancer detection for men with elevated serum PSA. Methods: A microsimulation model, based on the results of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer trial, was used to evaluate the effects of PSA screening and PHI reflex testing. We predicted the numbers of prostate cancers, negative biopsies, deaths, quality-adjusted life-years gained, and cost-effectiveness of both PSA (cutoff 3 ng/mL) and PHI (cutoff 25) testing methods for a European population, screened from age 50 to 75 years at 4-year intervals. Results: When the PHI test was added to the PSA screening, for men with a PSA between 3 and 10 ng/mL, the model predicted a 23% reduction in negative biopsies. This would lead to a 17% reduction in costs for diagnostics and 1% reduction in total costs for prostate cancer. The cost-effectiveness (3.5% discounted) was 11% better. Limitations found were the modeling assumptions on the sensitivity and specificity of PHI by tumor stage and cutoff values. Conclusions: Compared with PSA-only screening, the use of a PHI test can substantially reduce the number of negative biopsies and improve the cost-effectiveness of prostate cancer detection.
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 157
页数:5
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   20-year outcomes following conservative management of clinically localized prostate cancer [J].
Albertsen, PC ;
Hanley, JA ;
Fine, J .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 293 (17) :2095-2101
[2]  
[Anonymous], EUR STAND POP
[3]   Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in localized prostate cancer:: the Scandinavian Prostate Cancer Group-4 randomized trial [J].
Bill-Axelson, Anna ;
Holmberg, Lars ;
Filen, Frej ;
Ruutu, Mirja ;
Garmo, Hans ;
Busch, Christer ;
Nordling, Stig ;
Haggman, Michael ;
Andersson, Swen-Olof ;
Bratell, Stefan ;
Spangberg, Anders ;
Palmgren, Juni ;
Adami, Hans-Olov ;
Johansson, Jan-Erik .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2008, 100 (16) :1144-1154
[4]   Serum pro-prostate specific antigen preferentially detects aggressive prostate cancers in men with 2 to 4 ng/ml prostate specific antigen [J].
Catalona, WJ ;
Bartsch, G ;
Rittenhouse, HG ;
Evans, CL ;
Linton, HJ ;
Horninger, W ;
Klocker, H ;
Mikolajczyk, SD .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 171 (06) :2239-2244
[5]  
Catalona WJ, 2011, J UROLOGY, V185, P1650
[6]   Lead times and overdetection due to prostate-specific antigen screening:: Estimates from the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer [J].
Draisma, G ;
Boer, R ;
Otto, SJ ;
van der Cruijsen, IW ;
Damhuis, RAM ;
Schröder, FH ;
de Koning, HJ .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2003, 95 (12) :868-878
[7]  
Ekwueme Donatus U, 2007, Prev Chronic Dis, V4, pA100
[8]   Evaluation of [-2] proPSA and Prostate Health Index (phi) for the detection of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Filella, Xavier ;
Gimenez, Nuria .
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2013, 51 (04) :729-739
[9]   Overdetection, overtreatment and costs in prostate-specific antigen screening for prostate cancer [J].
Heijnsdijk, E. A. M. ;
der Kinderen, A. ;
Wever, E. M. ;
Draisma, G. ;
Roobol, M. J. ;
de Koning, H. J. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2009, 101 (11) :1833-1838
[10]  
Heijnsdijk EA, 2015, JNCI-J NATL CANCER I, V107, P36