New pasture plants intensify invasive species risk

被引:82
作者
Driscoll, Don A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Catford, Jane A. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Barney, Jacob N. [6 ]
Hulme, Philip E. [7 ]
Inderjit [8 ,9 ]
Martin, Tara G. [1 ,2 ,10 ]
Pauchard, Anibal [11 ,12 ]
Pysek, Petr [13 ,14 ]
Richardson, David M. [15 ]
Riley, Sophie [16 ]
Visser, Vernon [15 ]
机构
[1] Natl Environm Res Program Environm Decis Grp, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] ARC Ctr Excellence Environm Decis, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Australian Natl Univ, Fenner Sch Environm & Soc, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
[4] Univ Melbourne, Sch Bot, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
[5] Univ Minnesota, Dept Ecol Evolut & Behav, St Paul, MN 55108 USA
[6] Virginia Tech, Dept Plant Pathol Physiol & Weed Sci, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
[7] Lincoln Univ, Bioprotect Res Ctr, Lincoln 7647, New Zealand
[8] Univ Delhi, Dept Environm Studies, Delhi 110007, India
[9] Univ Delhi, Ctr Environm Management Degraded Ecosyst, Delhi 110007, India
[10] Commonwealth Sci & Ind Res Org Land & Water, Brisbane, Qld 4001, Australia
[11] Univ Concepcion, Fac Ciencias Forestales, Concepcion, Chile
[12] Inst Ecol & Biodivers, Santiago, Chile
[13] Acad Sci Czech Republ, Dept Invas Ecol, Inst Bot, CZ-25243 Pruhonice, Czech Republic
[14] Charles Univ Prague, Dept Ecol, CZ-12844 Prague, Czech Republic
[15] Univ Stellenbosch, Dept Bot & Zool, Ctr Invas Biol, ZA-7602 Matieland, South Africa
[16] Univ Technol Sydney, Fac Law, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会; 新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
agriculture policy; biological invasions; environmental weed; invasive species; sustainable intensification; BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS; PROPAGULE PRESSURE; GLOBAL CHANGE; BUFFEL GRASS; GENE FLOW; FRAMEWORK; IMPACTS; ESTABLISHMENT; AGRICULTURE; POPULATIONS;
D O I
10.1073/pnas.1409347111
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Agricultural intensification is critical to meet global food demand, but intensification threatens native species and degrades ecosystems. Sustainable intensification (SI) is heralded as a new approach for enabling growth in agriculture while minimizing environmental impacts. However, the SI literature has overlooked a major environmental risk. Using data from eight countries on six continents, we show that few governments regulate conventionally bred pasture taxa to limit threats to natural areas, even though most agribusinesses promote taxa with substantial weed risk. New pasture taxa (including species, subspecies, varieties, cultivars, and plant-endophyte combinations) are bred with characteristics typical of invasive species and environmental weeds. By introducing novel genetic and endophyte variation, pasture taxa are imbued with additional capacity for invasion and environmental impact. New strategies to prevent future problems are urgently needed. We highlight opportunities for researchers, agribusiness, and consumers to reduce environmental risks associated with new pasture taxa. We also emphasize four main approaches that governments could consider as they build new policies to limit weed risks, including (i) national lists of taxa that are prohibited based on environmental risk; (ii) a weed risk assessment for all new taxa; (iii) a program to rapidly detect and control new taxa that invade natural areas; and (iv) the polluter-pays principle, so that if a taxon becomes an environmental weed, industry pays for its management. There is mounting pressure to increase livestock production. With foresight and planning, growth in agriculture can be achieved sustainably provided that the scope of SI expands to encompass environmental weed risks.
引用
收藏
页码:16622 / 16627
页数:6
相关论文
共 83 条
[1]  
Alexandratos N., 2012, WORLD AGR 2030 2050
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Livestock long shadowEnvironmental Issues and Options, DOI 10.1890/1540-9295(2007)5[4:D]2.0.CO
[3]  
2
[4]   Bioenergy and Invasive Plants: Quantifying and Mitigating Future Risks [J].
Barney, Jacob N. .
INVASIVE PLANT SCIENCE AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 7 (02) :199-209
[5]   Hurricane Activity and the Large-Scale Pattern of Spread of an Invasive Plant Species [J].
Bhattarai, Ganesh P. ;
Cronin, James T. .
PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (05)
[6]   Economic evaluation of biological invasions -: a survey [J].
Born, W ;
Rauschmayer, F ;
Bräuer, I .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2005, 55 (03) :321-336
[7]   Global change, global trade, and the next wave of plant invasions [J].
Bradley, Bethany A. ;
Blumenthal, Dana M. ;
Early, Regan ;
Grosholz, Edwin D. ;
Lawler, Joshua J. ;
Miller, Luke P. ;
Sorte, Cascade J. B. ;
D'Antonio, Carla M. ;
Diez, Jeffrey M. ;
Dukes, Jeffrey S. ;
Ibanez, Ines ;
Olden, Julian D. .
FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 10 (01) :20-28
[8]   Solutions to silos: Joining up knowledge [J].
Bundred, S .
PUBLIC MONEY & MANAGEMENT, 2006, 26 (02) :125-130
[9]   Reducing redundancy in invasion ecology by integrating hypotheses into a single theoretical framework [J].
Catford, Jane A. ;
Jansson, Roland ;
Nilsson, Christer .
DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS, 2009, 15 (01) :22-40
[10]   Prioritising biosecurity investment between agricultural and environmental systems [J].
Cook, David C. ;
Fraser, Rob W. ;
Waage, Jeffrey K. ;
Thomas, Matthew B. .
JOURNAL FUR VERBRAUCHERSCHUTZ UND LEBENSMITTELSICHERHEIT-JOURNAL OF CONSUMER PROTECTION AND FOOD SAFETY, 2011, 6 :3-13