Use of Electrocautery for Coagulation and Wound Complications in Caesarean Sections

被引:11
作者
Moreira, CristianeM. [1 ]
Amaral, Eliana [2 ]
机构
[1] PUCCAMP, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, BR-13100 Campinas, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Estadual Campinas, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, BR-13083881 Campinas, SP, Brazil
来源
SCIENTIFIC WORLD JOURNAL | 2014年
关键词
CORD COAGULATION; ELECTROSURGERY; SURVEILLANCE; INFECTION; DELIVERY;
D O I
10.1155/2014/602375
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Objective. To evaluate the safety of electrocautery for coagulation during Caesarean sections. Study Design. A randomized, controlled, clinical pilot study was performed at a university maternity hospital. After admission for delivery and decision to perform a C-section, volunteers were randomized to either the intervention group (use of electrocautery for coagulation) or nonintervention group. The women were examined at the time of postpartum discharge (day 3), at days 7 to 10, and again at days 30 to 40 for signs of infection, hematoma, seroma, or dehiscence. Data were analyzed using an intention-to-treat analysis, and risk ratios were calculated. Results. No significant differences were found between the two groups. Only 2.8% of patients in the intervention group developed surgical wound complications during hospitalization. However, 7 to 10 days following discharge, these rates reached 23.0% and 15.4% in the intervention and nonintervention groups, respectively (RR = 1.50, 95% CI = 0.84-2.60). Conclusion. Further studies should confirm whether the use of electrocautery for coagulation does not increase the risk of surgical wound complications in patients undergoing Caesarean sections.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: Explanation and elaboration
    Altman, DG
    Schulz, KF
    Moher, D
    Egger, M
    Davidoff, F
    Elbourne, D
    Gotzsche, PC
    Lang, T
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2001, 134 (08) : 663 - 694
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2000, JAMA, V284, P3043
  • [3] Balague Carmen, 2009, Cir Esp, V85 Suppl 1, P15, DOI 10.1016/S0009-739X(09)71623-9
  • [4] Evidence-based surgery for cesarean delivery
    Berghella, V
    Baxter, JK
    Chauhan, SP
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 193 (05) : 1607 - 1617
  • [5] Bipolar electrosurgery: Convention and innovation
    Brill, Andrew I.
    [J]. CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 51 (01) : 153 - 158
  • [6] Postdischarge surveillance after cesarean section
    Creedy, DK
    Noy, DL
    [J]. BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE, 2001, 28 (04): : 264 - 269
  • [7] Dantas R. H. E. A., 2001, THESIS U SAO PAULO U
  • [8] Selective cord coagulation in acardiac twins
    Diehl, W.
    Hecher, K.
    [J]. SEMINARS IN FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2007, 12 (06) : 458 - 463
  • [9] Factors affecting caesarean operative time and the effect of operative time on pregnancy outcomes
    Doherty, Dorota A.
    Magann, Everett F.
    Chauhan, Suneet P.
    O'Boyle, Amy L.
    Busch, Jeanne M.
    Morrison, John C.
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2008, 48 (03) : 286 - 291
  • [10] A multicentre collaborative study on the use of cold scalpel and electrocautery for midline abdominal incision
    Franchi, M
    Ghezzi, F
    Benedetti-Panici, PL
    Melpignano, M
    Fallo, L
    Tateo, S
    Maggi, R
    Scambia, G
    Mangili, G
    Buttarelli, M
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2001, 181 (02) : 128 - 132