Mode of delivery and neonatal survival of infants with isolated gastroschisis

被引:58
作者
Salihu, HM
Emusu, D
Aliyu, ZY
Pierre-Louis, BJ
Druschel, CM
Kirby, RS
机构
[1] Univ Alabama, Dept Maternal & Child Hlth, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[2] New York State Dept Hlth, Congenital Malformat Registry, Troy, NY USA
[3] Univ S Florida, Dept Biostat & Epidemiol, Tampa, FL USA
[4] St Agnes Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.AOG.0000139513.93115.81
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare neonatal survival of infants with gastroschisis by mode of delivery. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study on infants with gastroschisis who were delivered in New York State from 1983 through 1999. We compared neonatal mortality between infants born vaginally and those delivered by cesarean using adjusted hazard ratios derived from Cox proportional hazards regression models. RESULTS: A total of 354 infants were found to have isolated gastroschisis. Of these, 174 were delivered vaginally, whereas 180 were delivered by cesarean. Neonatal mortality was registered among 18 infants (5.1%); 12 (6.9%) in the vaginal and 6 (3.3%) in the cesarean group. After controlling for potential confounders, the risk for neonatal demise was similar in both the vaginal and cesarean subcohorts (adjusted hazard ratio 0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.29-2.43). Preterm birth was the morbidity pathway that explained the early demise of infants with gastroschisis, irrespective of mode of delivery (adjusted hazard ratio 3.4, 95% CI 1.10 -10.4) whereas small for gestational age did not predict mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 1.04, 95% CI 0.13-8.14). CONCLUSION: In this study the mode of delivery was not found to be associated with neonatal survival of infants with gastroschisis. Preterm birth rather than small for gestational age was the predictor of neonatal death among gastroschisis infants. ((C) 2004 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.).
引用
收藏
页码:678 / 683
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   The fetus with gastroschisis: Impact of route of delivery and prenatal ultrasonography [J].
Adra, AM ;
Landy, HJ ;
Nahmias, J ;
GomezMarin, O .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 174 (02) :540-546
[2]   A United States national reference for fetal growth [J].
Alexander, GR ;
Himes, JH ;
Kaufman, RB ;
Mor, J ;
Kogan, M .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 87 (02) :163-168
[3]   CESAREAN-SECTION DOES NOT IMPROVE OUTCOME IN GASTROSCHISIS [J].
BETHEL, CAI ;
SEASHORE, JH ;
TOULOUKIAN, RJ .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 1989, 24 (01) :1-4
[4]   OMPHALOCELE AND GASTROSCHISIS IN EUROPE - A SURVEY OF 3-MILLION BIRTHS 1980-1990 [J].
CALZOLARI, E ;
BIANCHI, F ;
DOLK, H ;
MILAN, M ;
LECHAT, M ;
LEURQUIN, P ;
GOYENS, S ;
ASTOLFI, G ;
VOLPATO, S ;
AYME, S ;
CALABRO, A ;
CLEMENTI, M ;
TENCONI, R ;
CORNEL, M ;
CUSCHIERI, A ;
GARCIAMINAUR, S ;
GARNE, E ;
GILLEROT, Y ;
GOUJARD, J ;
HANSENKOENIG, D ;
ROULLEAUX, M ;
HOWARD, PJ ;
JOHNSON, Z ;
LILLIS, DF ;
NEVIN, NC ;
NELEN, V ;
PEXIEDER, T ;
PIERINI, A ;
STOLL, C ;
STONE, DH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 1995, 58 (02) :187-194
[5]  
COX DR, 1972, J R STAT SOC B, V34, P187
[6]   Process of and problems in changing a Birth Defects Registry reporting system [J].
Druschel, C ;
Sharpe-Stimac, M ;
Cross, P .
TERATOLOGY, 2001, 64 :S30-S36
[7]  
FITZSIMMONS J, 1988, OBSTET GYNECOL, V71, P910
[8]  
GRUNDY H, 1987, Fetal Therapy, V2, P144
[9]   GASTROSCHISIS AND OMPHALOCELE IN FINLAND IN THE 1970S - PREVALENCE AT BIRTH AND ITS CORRELATES [J].
HEMMINKI, K ;
SALONIEMI, I ;
KYYRONEN, P ;
KEKOMAKI, M .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 1982, 36 (04) :289-293
[10]   Birth defects surveillance: Assessing the "gold standard" [J].
Honein, MA ;
Paulozzi, LJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1999, 89 (08) :1238-1240