Beyond Theism and Atheism: Axiarchism and Ananthropocentric Purposivism

被引:5
作者
Mulgan, Tim [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Auckland, Philosophy, Auckland, New Zealand
[2] Univ St Andrews, Moral & Polit Philosophy, St Andrews, Fife, Scotland
关键词
GOD;
D O I
10.1111/phc3.12420
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
Two familiar worldviews dominate Western philosophy: materialist atheism and Abrahamic theism. One exciting development in recent philosophy of religion is the exploration of alternatives to both theism and atheism. This paper explores two alternatives: axiarchism and ananthropocentrism. Drawing on the long tradition of Platonism, axiarchists such as John Leslie, Derek Parfit and Nicholas Rescher posit a direct link between goodness and existence. The goodness of a possible world is what makes it actual. Ananthropocentric Purposivism (AP) holds that the universe has a purpose and that humans are irrelevant to that purpose. If there is a God, then God cares about what matters, but we do not matter to God.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
Adams R., 1994, LEIBNIZ
[2]   MUST GOD CREATE BEST [J].
ADAMS, RM .
PHILOSOPHICAL REVIEW, 1972, 81 (03) :317-332
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2004, EXISTENCE GOD
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2015, PURPOSE UNIVERSE
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2003, EXISTENCE GOD
[6]   Can there be alternative concepts of God? [J].
Bishop, J .
NOUS, 1998, 32 (02) :174-188
[7]  
Blumenfeld David., 1995, The Cambridge Companion to Leibniz, P353
[8]  
Dilley FB, 2000, INT J PHILOS RELIG, V47, P29, DOI 10.1023/A:1003838717365
[9]  
Ewing A.C., 1973, Value and Reality: the Philosophical Case for Theism
[10]  
Forumfor European Philosophy, 2016, DOES UN HAV PURP POD