Verifying Guideline Compliance in Clinical Treatment Using Multi-perspective Conformance Checking: A Case Study

被引:5
作者
Grueger, Joscha [1 ,2 ]
Geyer, Tobias [2 ]
Kuhn, Martin [2 ]
Braun, StephanA [3 ,4 ]
Bergmann, Ralph [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Trier, Business Informat Syst 2, Trier, Germany
[2] German Res Ctr Artificial Intelligence DFKI, Trier, Germany
[3] Univ Hosp Munster, Dept Dermatol, Munster, Germany
[4] Heinrich Heine Univ, Med Fac, Dept Dermatol, Dusseldorf, Germany
来源
PROCESS MINING WORKSHOPS, ICPM 2021 | 2022年 / 433卷
关键词
Process mining; Multi-perspective Conformance checking; Clinical guidelines; Guideline compliance;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-030-98581-3_22
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Clinical guidelines support physicians in the evidence-based treatment of patients. The technical verification of guideline compliance is not trivial, since guideline knowledge is usually represented textually and none of the approaches to computer-interpretable guideline representation has yet been able to establish itself. Due to the procedural nature of treatment sequences, this case study examines the applicability of a guideline process model to real hospital data for verification of guideline compliance. For this purpose, the limitations and challenges in the transformation of clinical data into an event log and in the application of conformance checking to align the data with the guideline reference model are investigated. As a data set, we use treatment data of skin tumor patients from a cancer registry enriched by hospital information system data. The results show the difficulty of applying process mining to medically complex and heterogeneous data and the need for complex preprocessing. The variability of clinical processes makes the application of global conformance checking algorithms challenging. In addition, the work shows the semantic weakness of the alignments and the need for new semantically sensitive approaches.
引用
收藏
页码:301 / 313
页数:13
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Alharbi RF, 2015, 2015 SCIENCE AND INFORMATION CONFERENCE (SAI), P597, DOI 10.1109/SAI.2015.7237204
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2016, P IEEE STD 802 11 20, P1, DOI DOI 10.1109/IEEESTD.2016.7740858
  • [4] Caron F., 2013, BUSINESS PROCESS ANA
  • [5] de Leoni Massimiliano, 2013, Business Process Management. 11th International Conference, BPM 2013. Proceedings: LNCS 8094, P113, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-40176-3_10
  • [6] GENERALIZED BEST-1ST SEARCH STRATEGIES AND THE OPTIMALITY OF A
    DECHTER, R
    PEARL, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ACM, 1985, 32 (03) : 505 - 536
  • [7] Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft Deutsche Krebshilfe AWMF, 2020, LEITL ONK DIAGN THER
  • [8] Dunzer Sebastian, 2019, P 11 INT C SUBJECTOR, V4, P1, DOI DOI 10.1145/3329007.3329014
  • [9] Edge S.B., 2010, AJCC CANC STAGING MA, DOI [10.1007/978-1-4757-3656-4, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4757-3656-4]
  • [10] Implementing clinical guidelines in psychiatry: a qualitative study of perceived facilitators and barriers
    Forsner, Tord
    Hansson, Johan
    Brommels, Mats
    Wistedt, Anna Aberg
    Forsell, Yvonne
    [J]. BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2010, 10