What kind of doing is clinical ethics?

被引:19
作者
Agich, GJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Dept Bioeth NA10, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
关键词
applied ethics; casuistry; conflict resolution; ethics consultation; principlism; Richard M. Zaner;
D O I
10.1007/s11017-004-4802-6
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
This paper discusses the importance of Richard M. Zaner's work on clinical ethics for answering the question: what kind of doing is ethics consultation? The paper argues first, that four common approaches to clinical ethics - applied ethics, casuistry, principlism, and conflict resolution - cannot adequately address the nature of the activity that makes up clinical ethics; second, that understanding the practical character of clinical ethics is critically important for the field; and third, that the practice of clinical ethics is bound up with the normative commitments of medicine as a therapeutic enterprise.
引用
收藏
页码:7 / 24
页数:18
相关论文
共 85 条
[1]  
Agich G, 2000, PHILOS MED, P117
[2]  
Agich George J., 2001, American Journal of Bioethics, V1, P31, DOI 10.1162/152651601317139360
[3]   AUTHORITY IN ETHICS CONSULTATION [J].
AGICH, GJ .
JOURNAL OF LAW MEDICINE & ETHICS, 1995, 23 (03) :273-283
[4]   CLINICAL ETHICS - A ROLE THEORETIC LOOK [J].
AGICH, GJ .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1990, 30 (04) :389-399
[5]  
Agich GJ, 1997, J MED PHILOS, V22, P381
[6]  
[Anonymous], INT J APPL PHILOS
[7]  
Aulisio MP, 1999, J CLIN ETHIC, V10, P3
[8]  
Beauchamp TL, 2000, J MED PHILOS, V25, P342, DOI 10.1076/0360-5310(200006)25:3
[9]  
1-H
[10]  
FT342