Risk stratification in acute upper GI bleeding: comparison of the AIMS65 score with the Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring systems

被引:103
|
作者
Robertson, Marcus [1 ,2 ]
Majumdar, Avik [1 ,2 ]
Boyapati, Ray [1 ,2 ]
Chung, William [1 ,2 ]
Worland, Tom [1 ,2 ]
Terbah, Ryma [1 ,2 ]
Wei, James [1 ,2 ]
Lontos, Steve [1 ,2 ]
Angus, Peter [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Vaughan, Rhys [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Austin Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Heidelberg, Vic 3084, Australia
[2] Austin Hosp, Liver Transplant Unit, 145 Studley Rd, Heidelberg, Vic 3084, Australia
[3] Univ Melbourne, Dept Med, Austin Hlth, Heidelberg, Vic, Australia
关键词
COMMUNITY-ACQUIRED PNEUMONIA; IN-HOSPITAL MORTALITY; PREDICTING STROKE; UNITED-STATES; ENDOSCOPY; MANAGEMENT; NEED; VALIDATION; DEATH;
D O I
10.1016/j.gie.2015.10.021
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Aims: The American College of Gastroenterology recommends early risk stratification in patients presenting with upper GI bleeding (UGIB). The AIMS65 score is a risk stratification score previously validated to predict inpatient mortality. The aim of this study was to validate the AIMS65 score as a predictor of inpatient mortality in patients with acute UGIB and to compare it with established pre- and postendoscopy risk scores. Methods: ICD-10 (International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision) codes identified patients presenting with UGIB requiring endoscopy. All patients were risk stratified by using the AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford score (GBS), pre-endoscopy Rockall, and full Rockall scores. The primary outcome was inpatient mortality. Secondary outcomes were a composite endpoint of inpatient mortality, rebleeding, and endoscopic, radiologic, or surgical intervention; blood transfusion requirement; intensive care unit (ICU) admission; rebleeding; and hospital length of stay. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was calculated for each score. Results: Of the 424 study patients, 18 (4.2%) died and 69 (16%) achieved the composite endpoint. The AIMS65 score was superior to both the GBS (AUROC, 0.80 vs 0.76, P < .027) and the pre-endoscopy Rockall score (0.74, P = .001) and equivalent to the full Rockall score (0.78, P = .18) in predicting inpatient mortality. The AIMS65 score was superior to all other scores in predicting the need for ICU admission and length of hospital stay. AIMS65, GBS, and full Rockall scores were equivalent (AUROCs, 0.63 vs 0.62 vs 0.63, respectively) and superior to pre-endoscopy Rockall (AUROC, 0.55) in predicting the composite endpoint. GBS was superior to all other scores for predicting blood transfusion. Conclusion: The AIMS65 score is a simple risk stratification score for UGIB with accuracy superior to that of GBS and pre-endoscopy Rockall scores in predicting in-hospital mortality and the need for ICU admission.
引用
收藏
页码:1151 / 1160
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage re-bleeding risk according to the Glasgow-Blatchford scale: a triage tool
    Olivarec-Bonilla, Miroslava
    Garcia-Montano, Anaidt M.
    Herrera-Arellano, Armando
    GACETA MEDICA DE MEXICO, 2020, 156 (06): : 502 - 508
  • [42] Comparison of four scoring systems for risk stratification of upper gastrointestinal bleeding
    Tuncer, Hakan
    Yardan, Turker
    Akdemir, Hizir Ufuk
    Ayyildiz, Talat
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2018, 34 (03) : 649 - 654
  • [43] External validation of Glasgow-Blatchford, modified Glasgow-Blatchford and CANUKA scores to identify low-risk patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding in emergency departments: a retrospective cohort study
    Pognonec, Celina
    Dirhoussi, Zidane
    Cury, Nicolas
    Moreau, Marie
    Billard, Charlotte
    Yordanov, Youri
    Thiebaud, Pierre-Clement
    EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2023, 40 (06) : 451 - +
  • [44] The AIMS65 Score Is a Useful Predictor of Mortality in Patients with Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Urgent Endoscopy in Patients with High AIMS65 Scores
    Park, Sun Wook
    Song, Young Wook
    Tak, Dae Hyun
    Ahn, Byung Moo
    Kang, Sun Hyung
    Moon, Hee Seok
    Sung, Jae Kyu
    Jeong, Hyun Yong
    CLINICAL ENDOSCOPY, 2015, 48 (06) : 522 - 527
  • [45] Comparison of three scoring systems for risk stratification in elderly patients wth acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding
    Kalkan, Cagdas
    Soykan, Irfan
    Karakaya, Fatih
    Tuzun, Ali
    Gencturk, Zeynep Biyikli
    GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 17 (04) : 575 - 583
  • [46] Risk stratifying patients with non-varicosic upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage using the Glasgow-Blatchford score: A case series of 91 patients
    Maghrebi, Houcine
    Beji, Hazem
    Haddad, Anis
    Sebai, Amine
    Safraoui, Samia
    Hafi, Maroua
    Laabidi, Asma
    Jouini, Mohamed
    Kacem, Montasser Jamel
    ANNALS OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2022, 78
  • [47] Glasgow Blatchford scoring system enables accurate risk stratification of patients with upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage
    Khalil, Fatima
    Yaqoob, Nayyar
    Perveen, Shahida
    Qureshi, Humera
    Khan, Muhammad Imran
    KHYBER MEDICAL UNIVERSITY JOURNAL-KMUJ, 2023, 15 (03): : 148 - 154
  • [48] Scoring systems for risk stratification in upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding
    Radaelli, Franco
    Rocchetto, Simone
    Piagnani, Alessandra
    Savino, Alberto
    Di Paolo, Dhanai
    Scardino, Giulia
    Paggi, Silvia
    Rondonotti, Emanuele
    BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2023, 67
  • [49] Comparative diagnostic utility of Rockall and Glasgow-Blatchford scores in non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kozai, Landon
    Tan, Arvin
    Nebrejas, Kevin
    Nishimura, Yoshito
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2025, 37 (02) : 161 - 166
  • [50] Validation of AIMS65 to predict outcomes in acute variceal bleeding: Which risk scoring system outperforms in real practice?
    Kawaguchi, Koichiro
    Isomoto, Hajime
    DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, 2020, 32 (05) : 739 - 741