Risk stratification in acute upper GI bleeding: comparison of the AIMS65 score with the Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring systems

被引:103
|
作者
Robertson, Marcus [1 ,2 ]
Majumdar, Avik [1 ,2 ]
Boyapati, Ray [1 ,2 ]
Chung, William [1 ,2 ]
Worland, Tom [1 ,2 ]
Terbah, Ryma [1 ,2 ]
Wei, James [1 ,2 ]
Lontos, Steve [1 ,2 ]
Angus, Peter [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Vaughan, Rhys [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Austin Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Heidelberg, Vic 3084, Australia
[2] Austin Hosp, Liver Transplant Unit, 145 Studley Rd, Heidelberg, Vic 3084, Australia
[3] Univ Melbourne, Dept Med, Austin Hlth, Heidelberg, Vic, Australia
关键词
COMMUNITY-ACQUIRED PNEUMONIA; IN-HOSPITAL MORTALITY; PREDICTING STROKE; UNITED-STATES; ENDOSCOPY; MANAGEMENT; NEED; VALIDATION; DEATH;
D O I
10.1016/j.gie.2015.10.021
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Aims: The American College of Gastroenterology recommends early risk stratification in patients presenting with upper GI bleeding (UGIB). The AIMS65 score is a risk stratification score previously validated to predict inpatient mortality. The aim of this study was to validate the AIMS65 score as a predictor of inpatient mortality in patients with acute UGIB and to compare it with established pre- and postendoscopy risk scores. Methods: ICD-10 (International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision) codes identified patients presenting with UGIB requiring endoscopy. All patients were risk stratified by using the AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford score (GBS), pre-endoscopy Rockall, and full Rockall scores. The primary outcome was inpatient mortality. Secondary outcomes were a composite endpoint of inpatient mortality, rebleeding, and endoscopic, radiologic, or surgical intervention; blood transfusion requirement; intensive care unit (ICU) admission; rebleeding; and hospital length of stay. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was calculated for each score. Results: Of the 424 study patients, 18 (4.2%) died and 69 (16%) achieved the composite endpoint. The AIMS65 score was superior to both the GBS (AUROC, 0.80 vs 0.76, P < .027) and the pre-endoscopy Rockall score (0.74, P = .001) and equivalent to the full Rockall score (0.78, P = .18) in predicting inpatient mortality. The AIMS65 score was superior to all other scores in predicting the need for ICU admission and length of hospital stay. AIMS65, GBS, and full Rockall scores were equivalent (AUROCs, 0.63 vs 0.62 vs 0.63, respectively) and superior to pre-endoscopy Rockall (AUROC, 0.55) in predicting the composite endpoint. GBS was superior to all other scores for predicting blood transfusion. Conclusion: The AIMS65 score is a simple risk stratification score for UGIB with accuracy superior to that of GBS and pre-endoscopy Rockall scores in predicting in-hospital mortality and the need for ICU admission.
引用
收藏
页码:1151 / 1160
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Acute upper gastrointestinal bleed patients requiring endoscopic intervention; assessment by Glasgow-Blatchford bleeding score
    Humaira, Mona
    Zakria, Kashif
    Ghani, Razia Hanif
    Ghani, Hanif
    Ansari, Shoaib
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2017, 22
  • [32] AIMS65 score predicts short-term mortality but not the need for intervention in acute upper GI bleeding Response
    Abougergi, Marwan S.
    Saltzman, John R.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2013, 78 (02) : 382 - 383
  • [33] Validation of a modified Glasgow-Blatchford Score for risk stratification of patients with suspected upper gastrointestinal bleeding in an accident and emergency department in Hong Kong
    Tsui, A. T. S.
    Chau, C. W.
    Leung, J. K. S.
    HONG KONG JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2016, 23 (02) : 3 - 11
  • [34] Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall score utility in predicting findings on video capsule endoscopy in patients admitted with overt small bowel bleeding
    Ballester, Raquel
    O'Connell, James
    Costigan, Conor
    Sengupta, Shreyashee
    Manoharan, Thilagaraj
    Martinez, Monserrat
    Mc Namara, Deirdre
    ENDOSCOPY INTERNATIONAL OPEN, 2025, 13
  • [35] AIMS65: A promising upper gastrointestinal bleeding risk score but further validation required
    Ray Boyapati
    Avik Majumdar
    Marcus Robertson
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2014, (39) : 14515 - 14516
  • [36] The Glasgow Blatchford scoring system enables accurate risk stratification of patients with upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage
    Srirajaskanthan, R.
    Conn, R.
    Bulwer, C.
    Irving, P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2010, 64 (07) : 868 - 874
  • [37] AIMS65: A promising upper gastrointestinal bleeding risk score but further validation required
    Boyapati, Ray
    Majumdar, Avik
    Robertson, Marcus
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 20 (39) : 14515 - 14516
  • [38] AIMS65 predicts prognosis of patients with duodena ulcer bleeding; a comparison with other risk-scoring systems
    Hirai, Ryosuke
    Shimodate, Yuichi
    Minami, Mariko
    Ishikawa, Sho
    Kanadani, Takafumi
    Takezawa, Rio
    Doi, Akira
    Nishimura, Naoyuki
    Mouri, Hirokazu
    Matsueda, Kazuhiro
    Yamamoto, Hiroshi
    Mizuno, Motowo
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2021, 33 (12) : 1480 - 1484
  • [39] Glasgow-Blatchford score combined with nasogastric aspirate as a new diagnostic algorithm for patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding
    Wakatsuki, Toshiyuki
    Mannami, Tomohiko
    Furutachi, Shinichi
    Numoto, Hiroki
    Umekawa, Tsuyoshi
    Mitsumune, Mayu
    Sakaki, Tsukasa
    Nagahara, Hanako
    Fukumoto, Yasushi
    Yorifuji, Takashi
    Shimizu, Shin'ichi
    DEN OPEN, 2023, 3 (01):
  • [40] Prognostic Value of AIMS65 Score in Cirrhotic Patients with Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding
    Gaduputi, Vinaya
    Abdulsamad, Molham
    Tariq, Hassan
    Rafeeq, Ahmed
    Abbas, Naeem
    Kumbum, Kavitha
    Chilimuri, Sridhar
    GASTROENTEROLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2014, 2014