Risk stratification in acute upper GI bleeding: comparison of the AIMS65 score with the Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring systems

被引:103
|
作者
Robertson, Marcus [1 ,2 ]
Majumdar, Avik [1 ,2 ]
Boyapati, Ray [1 ,2 ]
Chung, William [1 ,2 ]
Worland, Tom [1 ,2 ]
Terbah, Ryma [1 ,2 ]
Wei, James [1 ,2 ]
Lontos, Steve [1 ,2 ]
Angus, Peter [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Vaughan, Rhys [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Austin Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Heidelberg, Vic 3084, Australia
[2] Austin Hosp, Liver Transplant Unit, 145 Studley Rd, Heidelberg, Vic 3084, Australia
[3] Univ Melbourne, Dept Med, Austin Hlth, Heidelberg, Vic, Australia
关键词
COMMUNITY-ACQUIRED PNEUMONIA; IN-HOSPITAL MORTALITY; PREDICTING STROKE; UNITED-STATES; ENDOSCOPY; MANAGEMENT; NEED; VALIDATION; DEATH;
D O I
10.1016/j.gie.2015.10.021
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Aims: The American College of Gastroenterology recommends early risk stratification in patients presenting with upper GI bleeding (UGIB). The AIMS65 score is a risk stratification score previously validated to predict inpatient mortality. The aim of this study was to validate the AIMS65 score as a predictor of inpatient mortality in patients with acute UGIB and to compare it with established pre- and postendoscopy risk scores. Methods: ICD-10 (International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision) codes identified patients presenting with UGIB requiring endoscopy. All patients were risk stratified by using the AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford score (GBS), pre-endoscopy Rockall, and full Rockall scores. The primary outcome was inpatient mortality. Secondary outcomes were a composite endpoint of inpatient mortality, rebleeding, and endoscopic, radiologic, or surgical intervention; blood transfusion requirement; intensive care unit (ICU) admission; rebleeding; and hospital length of stay. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was calculated for each score. Results: Of the 424 study patients, 18 (4.2%) died and 69 (16%) achieved the composite endpoint. The AIMS65 score was superior to both the GBS (AUROC, 0.80 vs 0.76, P < .027) and the pre-endoscopy Rockall score (0.74, P = .001) and equivalent to the full Rockall score (0.78, P = .18) in predicting inpatient mortality. The AIMS65 score was superior to all other scores in predicting the need for ICU admission and length of hospital stay. AIMS65, GBS, and full Rockall scores were equivalent (AUROCs, 0.63 vs 0.62 vs 0.63, respectively) and superior to pre-endoscopy Rockall (AUROC, 0.55) in predicting the composite endpoint. GBS was superior to all other scores for predicting blood transfusion. Conclusion: The AIMS65 score is a simple risk stratification score for UGIB with accuracy superior to that of GBS and pre-endoscopy Rockall scores in predicting in-hospital mortality and the need for ICU admission.
引用
收藏
页码:1151 / 1160
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford and AIMS65 Scoring Systems for Risk Stratification in Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in the Emergency Department
    Yaka, Elif
    Yilmaz, Serkan
    Dogan, Nurettin Ozgur
    Pekdemir, Murat
    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2015, 22 (01) : 22 - 30
  • [2] Risk Stratification in Cancer Patients with Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Comparison of Glasgow-Blatchford, Rockall and AIMS65, and Development of a New Scoring System
    Franco, Matheus Cavalcante
    Jang, Sunguk
    Martins, Bruno da Costa
    Stevens, Tyler
    Jairath, Vipul
    Lopez, Rocio
    Vargo, John J.
    Barkun, Alan
    Maluf-Filho, Fauze
    CLINICAL ENDOSCOPY, 2022, 55 (02) : 240 - 247
  • [3] The AIMS65 score compared with the Glasgow-Blatchford score in predicting outcomes in upper GI bleeding
    Hyett, Brian H.
    Abougergi, Marwan S.
    Charpentier, Joseph P.
    Kumar, Navin L.
    Brozovic, Suzana
    Claggett, Brian L.
    Travis, Anne C.
    Saltzman, John R.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2013, 77 (04) : 551 - 557
  • [4] Comparison of the AIMS65 score with the Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring systems for the prediction of the risk of in-hospital death among patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding
    Lu, Xuefeng
    Zhang, Xiaojie
    Chen, Hong
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ENFERMEDADES DIGESTIVAS, 2020, 112 (06) : 467 - 473
  • [5] AIMS65 scoring system is comparable to Glasgow-Blatchford score or Rockall score for prediction of clinical outcomes for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding
    Kim, Min Seong
    Choi, Jeongmin
    Shin, Won Chang
    BMC GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [6] Comparison of the AIMS65 and Glasgow Blatchford score for risk stratification in elderly patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding
    Zhao, S. F.
    Qu, Q. Y.
    Feng, K.
    Song, M. Q.
    EUROPEAN GERIATRIC MEDICINE, 2017, 8 (01) : 37 - 41
  • [7] External validation and comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford score, modified Glasgow-Blatchford score, Rockall score and AIMS65 score in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a cross-sectional observational study in Western Switzerland
    Rivieri, Sirio
    Carron, Pierre-Nicolas
    Schoepfer, Alain
    Ageron, Francois-Xavier
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2023, 30 (01) : 32 - 39
  • [8] AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford bleeding score and modified Glasgow-Blatchford bleeding score in predicting outcomes of upper gastrointestinal bleeding: An accuracy and calibration study
    P. V. Akhila Arya
    N. K. Thulaseedharan
    Rishi Raj
    Dileep C. Unnikrishnan
    Aasems Jacob
    Indian Journal of Gastroenterology, 2023, 42 : 496 - 504
  • [9] AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford bleeding score and modified Glasgow-Blatchford bleeding score in predicting outcomes of upper gastrointestinal bleeding: An accuracy and calibration study
    Arya, P. V. Akhila
    Thulaseedharan, N. K.
    Raj, Rishi
    Unnikrishnan, Dileep C. C.
    Jacob, Aasems
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2023, 42 (04) : 496 - 504
  • [10] Age, blood tests and comorbidities and AIMS65 risk scores outperform Glasgow-Blatchford and pre-endoscopic Rockall score in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding
    Morarasu, Bianca Codrina
    Sorodoc, Victorita
    Haisan, Anca
    Morarasu, Stefan
    Bologa, Cristina
    Haliga, Raluca Ecaterina
    Lionte, Catalina
    Marciuc, Emilia Adriana
    Elsiddig, Mohammed
    Cimpoesu, Diana
    Dimofte, Gabriel Mihail
    Sorodoc, Laurentiu
    WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CASES, 2023, 11 (19) : 4513 - 4530