Comparison of Feedback Control Techniques for Torque-Vectoring Control of Fully Electric Vehicles

被引:101
作者
De Novellis, Leonardo [1 ]
Sorniotti, Aldo [1 ]
Gruber, Patrick [1 ]
Pennycott, Andrew [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Surrey, Surrey GU2 7XH, England
关键词
Fully electric vehicle (FEV); sideslip angle; torque-vectoring (TV) control; yaw rate; STABILITY CONTROL; CONTROL ALGORITHM; DESIGN; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1109/TVT.2014.2305475
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Fully electric vehicles (FEVs) with individually controlled powertrains can significantly enhance vehicle response to steering-wheel inputs in both steady-state and transient conditions, thereby improving vehicle handling and, thus, active safety and the fun-to-drive element. This paper presents a comparison between different torque-vectoring control structures for the yaw moment control of FEVs. Two second-order sliding-mode controllers are evaluated against a feedforward controller combined with either a conventional or an adaptive proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controller. Furthermore, the potential performance and robustness benefits arising from the integration of a body sideslip controller with the yaw rate feedback control system are assessed. The results show that all the evaluated controllers are able to significantly change the understeer behavior with respect to the baseline vehicle. The PID-based controllers achieve very good vehicle performance in steady-state and transient conditions, whereas the controllers based on the sliding-mode approach demonstrate a high level of robustness against variations in the vehicle parameters. The integrated sideslip controller effectively maintains the sideslip angle within acceptable limits in the case of an erroneous estimation of the tire-road friction coefficient.
引用
收藏
页码:3612 / 3623
页数:12
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
Abe M, 1986, Vehicle System Dynamics, V15, P1
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, TYRE VEHICLE DYNAMIC
[3]   Yaw stability control of an automotive vehicle via generalized predictive algorithm [J].
Anwar, S .
ACC: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2005 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-7, 2005, :435-440
[4]  
Bartolini G, 1997, INT J ROBUST NONLIN, V7, P299, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1239(199704)7:4<299::AID-RNC279>3.0.CO
[5]  
2-3
[6]   Chattering avoidance by second-order sliding mode control [J].
Bartolini, G ;
Ferrara, A ;
Usai, E .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 1998, 43 (02) :241-246
[7]   On the convergence properties of a 2-sliding control algorithm for non-linear uncertain systems [J].
Bartolini, G ;
Ferrara, A ;
Pisano, A ;
Usai, E .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONTROL, 2001, 74 (07) :718-731
[8]   The effect of half-shaft torsion dynamics on the performance of a traction control system for electric vehicles [J].
Bottiglione, Francesco ;
Sorniotti, Aldo ;
Shead, Leo .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART D-JOURNAL OF AUTOMOBILE ENGINEERING, 2012, 226 (D9) :1145-1159
[9]   Vehicle Yaw Control via Second-Order Sliding-Mode Technique [J].
Canale, Massimo ;
Fagiano, Lorenzo ;
Ferrara, Antonella ;
Vecchio, Claudio .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, 2008, 55 (11) :3908-3916
[10]   Comparing Internal Model Control and Sliding-Mode Approaches for Vehicle Yaw Control [J].
Canale, Massimo ;
Fagiano, Lorenzo ;
Ferrara, Antonella ;
Vecchio, Claudio .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, 2009, 10 (01) :31-41