An MRI-Based Patient-Specific Computational Framework for the Calculation of Range of Motion of Total Hip Replacements

被引:7
作者
Kebbach, Maeruan [1 ]
Schulze, Christian [1 ]
Meyenburg, Christian [1 ]
Kluess, Daniel [1 ]
Sungu, Mevluet [2 ]
Hartmann, Albrecht [3 ]
Gunther, Klaus-Peter [3 ]
Bader, Rainer [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Rostock, Dept Orthopaed, Biomech & Implant Technol Res Lab, Doberaner Str 142, D-18057 Rostock, Germany
[2] Aesculap AG Res & Dev, D-78532 Tuttlingen, Germany
[3] Tech Univ Dresden, Univ Hosp Carl Gustav Carus, Dept Orthoped Surg, D-01307 Dresden, Germany
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2021年 / 11卷 / 06期
关键词
joint replacement; hip joint; range of motion; impingement; ACETABULAR CUP ANTEVERSION; FINITE-ELEMENT-ANALYSIS; HEAD SIZE; IMPINGEMENT-FREE; ARTHROPLASTY; DISLOCATION; DESIGN; ORIENTATION; PROSTHESIS; STABILITY;
D O I
10.3390/app11062852
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
The calculation of range of motion (ROM) is a key factor during preoperative planning of total hip replacements (THR), to reduce the risk of impingement and dislocation of the artificial hip joint. To support the preoperative assessment of THR, a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based computational framework was generated; this enabled the estimation of patient-specific ROM and type of impingement (bone-to-bone, implant-to-bone, and implant-to-implant) postoperatively, using a three-dimensional computer-aided design (CAD) to visualize typical clinical joint movements. Hence, patient-specific CAD models from 19 patients were generated from MRI scans and a conventional total hip system (Bicontact(R) hip stem and Plasmacup(R) SC acetabular cup with a ceramic-on-ceramic bearing) was implanted virtually. As a verification of the framework, the ROM was compared between preoperatively planned and the postoperatively reconstructed situations; this was derived based on postoperative radiographs (n = 6 patients) during different clinically relevant movements. The data analysis revealed there was no significant difference between preoperatively planned and postoperatively reconstructed ROM ( increment (ROM)) of maximum flexion ( increment (ROM) = 0 degrees, p = 0.854) and internal rotation ( increment (ROM) = 1.8 degrees, p = 0.917). Contrarily, minor differences were observed for the ROM during maximum external rotation ( increment (ROM) = 9 degrees, p = 0.046). Impingement, of all three types, was in good agreement with the preoperatively planned and postoperatively reconstructed scenarios during all movements. The calculated ROM reached physiological levels during flexion and internal rotation movement; however, it exceeded physiological levels during external rotation. Patients, where implant-to-implant impingement was detected, reached higher ROMs than patients with bone-to-bone impingement. The proposed framework provides the capability to predict postoperative ROM of THRs.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 81 条
[31]   Analytical computational model for the determination of the influence of design and surgical factors on the range of motion of total hip replacements [J].
Kliewe, Christian ;
Souffrant, Robert ;
Kluess, Daniel ;
Woernle, Christoph ;
Broekel, Klaus ;
Bader, Rainer .
BIOMEDIZINISCHE TECHNIK, 2010, 55 (01) :47-55
[32]   Computerized Range of Motion Analysis Following Dual Mobility Total Hip Arthroplasty, Traditional Total Hip Arthroplasty, and Hip Resurfacing [J].
Klingenstein, Gregory G. ;
Yeager, Alyssa M. ;
Lipman, Joseph D. ;
Westrich, Geoffrey H. .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2013, 28 (07) :1173-1176
[33]   Influence of femoral head size on impingement, dislocation and stress distribution in total hip replacement [J].
Kluess, Daniel ;
Martin, Heiner ;
Mittelmeier, Wolfram ;
Schmitz, Klaus-Peter ;
Bader, Rainer .
MEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICS, 2007, 29 (04) :465-471
[34]   A convenient approach for finite-element-analyses of orthopaedic implants in bone contact: Modeling and experimental validation [J].
Kluess, Daniel ;
Souffrant, Robert ;
Mittelmeier, Wolfram ;
Wree, Andreas ;
Schmitz, Klaus-Peter ;
Bader, Rainer .
COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE, 2009, 95 (01) :23-30
[35]   Limited range of motion of hip resurfacing arthroplasty due to unfavorable ratio of prosthetic head size and femoral neck diameter [J].
Kluess, Daniel ;
Zietz, Carmen ;
Lindner, Tobias ;
Mittelmeier, Wolfram ;
Schmitz, Klaus-Peter ;
Bader, Rainer .
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA, 2008, 79 (06) :748-754
[36]   Clinical evaluation of hip joint rotation range of motion in adults [J].
Kouyoumdjian, P. ;
Coulomb, R. ;
Sanchez, T. ;
Asencio, G. .
ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2012, 98 (01) :17-23
[37]   Prevalence of Total Hip and Knee Replacement in the United States [J].
Kremers, Hilal Maradit ;
Larson, Dirk R. ;
Crowson, Cynthia S. ;
Kremers, Walter K. ;
Washington, Raynard E. ;
Steiner, Claudia A. ;
Jiranek, William A. ;
Berry, Daniel J. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2015, 97A (17) :1386-1397
[38]   The effect of acetabular cup orientations on limiting hip rotation [J].
Kummer, FJ ;
Shah, S ;
Iyer, S ;
DiCesare, PE .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 1999, 14 (04) :509-513
[39]   Impact of the Economic Downturn on Total Joint Replacement Demand in the United States [J].
Kurtz, Steven M. ;
Ong, Kevin L. ;
Lau, Edmund ;
Bozic, Kevin J. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2014, 96A (08) :624-630
[40]   Measurement of the Acetabular Cup Anteversion on Simulated Radiographs [J].
Liaw, Chen-Kun ;
Yang, Rong-Sen ;
Hou, Sheng-Mou ;
Wu, Tai-Yin ;
Fuh, Chiou-Shann .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2009, 24 (03) :468-474